Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Pantheism > Re: The Religio...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 487 of 534
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Religious Argument...

by Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 25, 2007 at 10:10 PM

On 25 May 2007 14:30:34 -0700, in alt.atheism , sdr
<sdrodrian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in
<1180128634.352051.30310@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  wrote:

>The religious argument 

What is "the religious argument"? I know of multiple religions with
multiple arguments each.

>is a complete and
>total hypocrisy: As a child I was taught that
>the world was 6,000 or so years old (the
>Bible said so, and God "wrote" the Bible).

Oh, young Earth Creationism: that is factually wrong.

[snip]

>
>Hypocrisy: How can one say God exists (proof
>positive) and in the same breath claim Faith
>(which is what one needs in the absence of
>proof)...?

Very few people I know of do this. Usually they go with the second
part not the first.

[snip]


-- 
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: The Religious Argument...
Matt Silberstein <Remo  2007-05-25 22:10:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 16:28:06 CDT 2008.