A Week That Revealed Islam's Terrorist Nature
Were Your Eyes Opened?
(This page contains extremely graphic and disturbing images of the Be'er
Sheva bus bombings, the suicide bombing in Moscow, the terrorist acts
against Russian aircraft, the Beslan Russia school atrocities, and the
Nepalese beheadings in Iraq. The images are set alongside excerpts from
Prophet Of Doom: Islam's Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What kind of people would conceive and perpetrate a scheme that would lead
to the burning, mutilation and death of 350 young children as was done in
the school this week in Russia? What dogma was responsible for motivating
Islamic women earlier this week to strap bombs to their bodies and board
two
Russian aircraft filled with passengers for the purpose of blowing them up
and killing everyone?
What doctrine was professed by the suicide bombers who shouted "Allahu
Akbar" before they murdered 20 Jews this week in Beersheba, Israel? Was
it
the same religion professed by the Muslims who decapitated a Nepalese
worker
in Iraq, and blew out the brains of a dozen more, while shouting verses
from
the Qur'an? Could Islam be the reason the Islamic cleric in Iraq motivated
his Jihadist militia to torture, rape and desecrate Iraqis who wouldn't
join
in the terrorist raids, piling hundreds of mutilated and ****d bodies
behind
a mosque?
When Osama bin Laden praised Allah and Islam for the success of the 9/11
terrorist attack and said "I am following in Muhammad's footsteps," do you
think that he might have been telling us something im****tant? Could it
have
been a confession? Since the first bombing of the World Trade Center in
'93
was perpetrated by ****ek Ar-Rahman, the world's foremost authority on the
Qur'an, might we assume that Islam's scriptures condone terror? Are these
vicious attacks perpetrated in the name of Islam and Allah unrelated? Are
they just the misguided acts of random people, or do those we call
terrorists, rebels, and insurgents have something in common-Islam perhaps?
Since the answer is so obvious, why is it that our media and politicians
are
more worried about not offending the murders, and calling them what they
are, "Muslims," than they are with protecting the lives of Islam's next
victims? How is it that we are at war with a tactic, rather than with the
religion that inspires its followers to use the tactic? Declaring war on
terror is like declaring war on drugs rather than understanding and
condemning the reason people sell and use drugs.
The most im****tant question is: how many innocent people are going to die
at
the hand of Islam before we hold Islam accountable? Good Muslims murdered
3,000 American's on 9-11, but that wasn't sufficient. Muslims murdered 3
million people in the Sudan, so even that's not enough. When Muslims
deploy
nuclear bombs and radiological dispersion devices in America's largest
cities, do you think our politicians and media will identify the
perpetrators by name or by tactic?
I have some bad news. I know the answer. Our politicians and our media are
not going to change-they are not going to tell or re****t the truth-because
we are not willing to hold them accountable. As a result, good Muslims
will
continue to follow Muhammad's example and Allah's orders. They will
continue
to murder and mutilated, fight and terrorize. They will destroy America
just
as they have destroyed themselves.
For those who have been deceived into believing that "the terrorists have
hijacked their religion" rather than their religion corrupting them, you
need to read Prophet of Doom-the best documented and most comprehensive,
contextual, and chronological presentation of Muhammad's creation of Islam
ever written. With so much at stake, the lives of millions of innocent
people, it's odd that I would have to encourage you to face reality and to
come to grips with why Muslims are killing us. And recognizing that most
who
read this photo essay will be too preoccupied with other things to learn
the
truth, I'll tempt you into reading with excerpts from the book which could
save your nation and your life.
The two stories that you are about to read are derived from Muhammad's
Sira,
or Biography, Islam's Ta'rikh, or History, and the Muslim Hadith, or
Re****ts
that were recited during Islam's formation. They paint a horrible picture,
almost too revolting for words. But they are Islam-fundamental and
uncorrupted Islam. These stories epitomize the lessons Allah taught in the
Qur'an's 8th surah called "The Spoils of War."
First the surah, then the stories: Muhammad claims his god said some
things
you'd expect to read in Hitler's Mein Kampf. Each of the following quotes
is
from the "Spoils of War" surah. It explains why Muslims are willing to
kill
to achieve their monopoly. Qur'an 008.001"They ask you about the benefits
of
capturing the spoils of war. Tell them: 'The benefits belong to Allah and
to
His Messenger.' So fulfill your duty to Allah and the Prophet." 008.005
"Your Lord sent you from your homes to fight for the true cause." 008.007
"Allah wished to confirm the truth by His words: 'Wipe the infidels out to
the last.'" 008.012 "I shall terrorize the infidels. So wound their bodies
and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle." 008.015
"Believers, when you meet the unbelievers in battle, do not turn your back
on them for any Muslim who retreats will bring the wrath of Allah on
himself
and will abide in Hell." 008.072 "Those who accepted Islam and left their
homes to fight in Allah's Cause with their possessions and persons, and
those who gave them shelter and aided them are your allies. You are only
called to protect Muslims who fight." 008.073 "The infidels aid one
another.
Unless you do the same there will be anarchy in the land. Those who
accepted
Islam and left their homes to fight in Allah's Cause are good Muslims."
008.057 "If you meet them in battle, inflict on them such a defeat as
would
be a lesson for those who come after them, that they may be warned."
008.059
"The infidels should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare
against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may
terrorize them. They are your enemy and Allah's enemy." 008.071 "He will
give you mastery over them." 008.039 "So, fight them till all opposition
ends and the only religion is Islam."
Now, for the first of two stories, both documented from and revealed in
the
Islamic scriptures.
Darkness was about to descend upon Islam. Ishaq:461 "Just before the noon
prayers, Gabriel came to the Apostle wearing a gold turban. He was riding
a
mule. He said, 'Have you laid down your weapons and stopped fighting,
Muhammad?' 'Yes,' he replied. Gabriel said, 'The angels have not laid down
their arms! I've just returned from pursuing the enemy. Allah commands you
to march to the Qurayza. I, too, will attack the Jews and shake them out
of
their homes.'" Angels in turbans, lumbering on donkeys, wielding swords,
commanding Arabs to slaughter Jews-it's quite a picture.
Aisha, the prophet's child wife, put down her dolls long enough to give us
this re****t: Tabari VIII:29 "Muhammad pitched a round tent over Sa'd [the
wounded anti-Semite] in the mosque. He laid down his sword, having just
returned from the Trench. Then Gabriel came to him and said: 'Have you
abandoned the fight? By Allah, the angels have not yet put down their
weapons! Go out and fight the Jews!' So he called for his breastplate and
put it back on. Then he went out and the Muslims followed him."
I would be remiss if I did not share Bukhari's theory on the arrival of
the
angelic tormentors: Bukhari:V5B59N443-8 "When the Prophet returned from
the
Trench, laid down his arms and took a bath, Gabriel came to him covered in
dust. "Why have you laid down your sword? We angels have not set them down
yet. It's time to go out against them.' The Prophet said, 'Where to go?'
Gabriel said, 'This way,' pointing towards the Qurayza. So the Prophet
went
out to besiege them." And: Bukhari:V5B59N444 "The dust rose in the streets
of Medina as Gabriel's regiment marched through. The angels joined Allah's
Apostle in attacking the Qurayza Jews."
Putting terror and piracy ahead of teaching and prophecy: Ishaq:461/Tabari
VIII:28 "The Messenger commanded a crier to announce that all should heed
and obey. He ordered that none should perform the afternoon prayer until
after they reached the Qurayza settlement. The Prophet sent Ali ahead with
his war banner against the Jews, and the Muslims hastened to it. Ali
advanced toward their homes and heard insulting language from the Jews
about
Allah's Messenger. Ali ran back and told the Prophet that the Jews were
rascals and that there was no need for him to go near those wicked men.
'Why?' Muhammad asked. 'Have you heard them insult me?' 'Yes,' Ali
answered.
'Had they seen me,' Allah's Apostle replied, 'they would not have said
anything of the sort.'"
This next passage is illuminating. The Bible suggests that Lucifer was
beautiful. Islam agrees. Ishaq:461/Tabari VIII:28 "Before reaching the
Qurayza, Muhammad greeted his Companions. 'Has anyone passed you?' he
asked.
'Yes, Prophet,' they replied. 'Dihyah ibn Khalifah passed us on a white
mule
with a brocade covered saddle.'" The translators of Tabari's History
confirm: "Dihyah was a rich merchant of such beauty, the angel Gabriel is
said to have assumed his features. When he arrived in Medina, every woman
came out to look at him." "Allah's Apostle said, 'That was Gabriel. He was
sent to the Qurayza to shake their homes and terrorize them.'" Billions
have
been conned into believing that a dust-covered, sword-wielding terrorist
was
God's messenger to mankind.
War was more im****tant than prayer to Islam's dark spirit: Tabari VIII:29
"The Holy Prophet (peace be unto him) said, 'No one should pray the
afternoon prayer until they are in the territory of the Qurayza because
warfare against the Jews is incumbent upon Muslims.'" Ishaq:461 "The
Muslims
had been totally occupied with warlike preparations. They refused to pray
until they had come upon the Jews in accordance with Muhammad's order.
Allah
did not find fault with them in His Book, nor did the Messenger reprimand
them for it." Postponing a prayer so that they could besiege innocent
families was so religious of them. They were setting a fine example for
terrorists everywhere. And it's pretty hard to misinterpret this prophetic
decree: "Warfare against the Jews is incumbent upon Muslims."
Demonstrating his deep-seated racial hatred, Muhammad unleashed what we
would call hate speech: Tabari VIII:28 "When the Messenger approached the
Jews, he said, 'You brothers of apes! Allah shamed you and cursed you.'"
Muhammad's mouth was as foul as his manners. Bukhari:V5B59N449 "On the day
of the Qurayza siege, Allah's Apostle said to Hassan, 'Abuse them with
your
poems, for Gabriel is with you.'" When it came to racial hatred, Islam's
prophet was a full service provider.
Demonstrating the lack of objectivity Islam inspires, those who recorded
this Hadith said that the Jews responded sarcastically to Muhammad's slur.
"They said, 'Abu al-Qasim, you have never been one to act impetuously or
violently.'"
Ishaq:461/Tabari VIII:29 "Muhammad besieged them for twenty-five nights.
When the siege became too severe, Allah terrorized them. Then they were
told
to submit to the judgment of Allah's Messenger." Muhammad and Allah had
become indistinguishable. And that's because, together with Lucifer, they
were now Islam's Unholy Trinity-a false god, a false prophet, and a
demonic
spirit. Their personas were one.
Tabari's Hadith says: "Abu Lubaba gave a sign that it would mean
slaughter.
So they said, 'We will submit to the judgment of Sa'd.'" Since Sa'd's
dying
wish was to see the Jews massacred, and since he was the most fervent Jew
hater in the land, I find this request less than credible.
"The Holy Prophet said, 'Submit to his judgment.' So they submitted. The
Messenger of Allah sent a donkey with a saddle padded with palm fiber, and
he was mounted on it."
That's obviously not how it happened, so let's check the Sira: Ishaq:461
"After the siege exhausted and terrorized them, the Jews felt certain that
the Apostle would not leave them until he had exterminated them. So they
decided to talk to Ka'b Asad. He said, 'People of the Jews, you see what
has
befallen you. I shall propose three alternatives. Take whichever one you
please.' He said, 'Swear allegiance to this man and accept him; for, by
Allah, it has become clear to you that he is a prophet sent from Allah. It
is he that you used to find mentioned in your scripture book. Then you
will
be secure in your lives, your property, your children, and your wives.'"
Getting one out of three right wasn't bad for a Muslim: Muhammad was
Allah's
prophet.
However, there is no mention of an Arab prophet in the Hebrew Scriptures,
much less of a coming terrorist thug. But consider the gall it took to
suggest this delusional alternative to the besieged Jews-especially after
what they had endured at the hands of the wannabe "messiah." And even the
Qur'an admits that the Jews had repeatedly rejected Muhammad's assertions
as
being preposterous. They had disclaimed his bastardization of their Torah,
and they had been repulsed by his warmongering nature and grotesque
immorality. Just imagine swearing an oath to a "religious prophet" so that
he would not kill you, steal your property, enslave your children, and
rape
your women. Sure, a Muslim would do it; they're trained to lie, but not a
Jew.
Ishaq:462/Tabari VIII:30 "The Jews said, 'We will never abandon the Torah
or
exchange it for the Qur'an.' Asad said, 'Since you reject this proposal of
mine, then kill your children and your wives and go out to Muhammad and
his
Companions as men who brandish swords, leaving behind no impediments to
worry you. If you die, you shall have left nothing behind; if you win you
shall find other women and children.' The Jews replied, 'Why would we kill
these poor ones? What would be the good of living after them?'" While I
don't
believe a word of this, , if it were true, it provides a window into the
depraved character of the first Muslims as well as to the godly nature of
these Jews.
In the third alternative, Asad asked the Jews to violate their Sabbath and
attack Muhammad by surprise. It was another ploy. Muslims like to call
infidels ungodly when they fight on holy days or in sacred months, yet
they
do so with glee. And if memory serves me right, in their last major
offensive against the Jews in 1974, Muslims launched a surprise attack on
Yom Kippur. Tabari VIII:30 "The Jews said, 'We will not profane our
Sabbath.'"
Ishaq:462 "Then the Jews asked Muhammad, 'Send us Abu Lubaba, one of the
Aws,' for they were confederates, 'so that we can ask his advice.' The
Prophet complied and the Jews grabbed hold of him. The women and children
were crying, so he felt pity for them. They said, 'Abu, do you think we
should submit to Muhammad's judgment?' 'Yes,' Lubaba said. But he pointed
with his hand to his throat, indicating that it would be slaughter. Lubaba
later said, 'As soon as my feet moved, I knew that I had betrayed Allah's
Apostle. Lubaba rushed away and tied himself to a pillar in the mosque. He
cried, 'I will not leave this spot until Allah forgives me for what I've
done. I betrayed His Apostle.'" This confirms Muhammad had intended to
slaughter the Jews from the very beginning. There would be no Islamic
peace
this time-no surrendering, no being looted and then exiled.
Ishaq:462/Tabari VIII:32 "I heard Allah's Apostle laughing at daybreak; so
I
said, 'Why are you laughing, Prophet? May Allah make you laugh heartily!'
He
replied, 'Lubaba has been forgiven.'" Consider the character of a man who
would laugh at such a time. This reminds me of Hitler, who in Mein Kampf
said, "I have become incapable of pity." And the similarities don't end
there. Hitler turned his command posts into mini brothels from which he
orchestrated the extermination of 6 million Jews. This last conversation
took place in one of the many apartments that comprised Muhammad's
mosque-his command center. When Umm Salama, the wife with whom der prophet
was being intimate, heard that Abu had been forgiven, she asked, "'Can I
give him the good news?' He said yes, so she went and stood at the door of
her room and said, 'O Lubaba, rejoice, for Allah has forgiven you.'"
Another treasure from this dark dawn also smacks of Hitler and his Nazi
goons. Muhammad had personal guards like der fuhrer's Storm Troopers and
S.S. Ishaq:463 "Amr went passed the Apostle's guards who were commanded
that
night by Maslama. He challenged him." Last time I checked, the founders of
Christianity and Judaism, Yahshua and Moses, didn't have guards. Muhammad
not only had them, Maslama, his senior guard, was none other than the
assassin who had murdered the first Jewish journalist. Remember: "I will
kill him for you."
The Islamic world appears to have used Gestapo tactics. After Maslama
interrogated Amr at the door of Muhammad's mosque: Ishaq:463 "Amr vanished
into the night. It is not known to this day what happened to him. Some
allege that he was bound with a rotten rope and cast away."
Ishaq:463/Tabari VIII:33 "In the morning, the Jews submitted to the
judgment
of Allah's Messenger. The Aws leapt up and said, 'Muhammad, they are our
allies. You know what you did the other day with the allies of the
Khazraj!
(Before besieging the Qurayza, the Messenger had besieged the Qaynuqa, who
were the confederates of the Khazraj. They had submitted to his judgment
and
were banished.) Therefore, when the Aws spoke to him, the Messenger said,
'People of the Aws, will you not be satisfied if one of your own men
passes
judgment on them?' Yes,' they proclaimed. So the Prophet said, 'It shall
be
entrusted to Sa'd [the Jew-Hater] Mu'adh.'"
Sa'd had been so fat his armor failed to protect his extremities. He had
been shot with an Arab arrow during the battle of the Trench. To say he
was
a militant would be too kind. Bukhari:V5B59N448 "Sa'd said, 'O Allah! You
know that there is nothing more beloved to me than to fight in Your Cause
against those who disbelieve Your Apostle. O Allah! I think you have put
to
an end the fight between us and the infidels. But if there still remains
any
fight with the infidels, then keep me alive till I fight against them for
Your sake.'" Sa'd was hardly a saint.
Ishaq:463/Tabari VIII:33 "The Prophet had placed Sa'd in the tent of a
Muslim woman in his mosque. She nursed his wound and earned merit for
herself by serving Muslims. When Sa'd was struck by the arrow, Muhammad
said, 'Put him in Rufaydah's tent, so that I can visit him from nearby.'
Then the Prophet appointed him judge over the Qurayza Jews. His tribesmen
lifted him onto a donkey on which they had put a leather cu****on, for he
was
a stout, corpulent man. En route to Muhammad, the Aws said, 'Treat our
client well for the Prophet has put you in charge of this matter. After
many
requests, Sa'd said, 'The time has come for Sa'd, in the Cause of Allah,
not
to be influenced by anyone's reproach.' Some of the people who heard him,
announced the impending death of the Qurayza before Sa'd Mu'adh reached
them
because of the words he had said." Islam's dark spirit had it in for the
Jews. For Sa'd to gain entry into his brothel, Sa'd would have to sup****t
his agenda.
Ishaq:463/Tabari VIII:34 "When Sa'd reached the Messenger of Allah and the
Muslims, the Prophet said, 'Arise and go to your master and help him
dismount.' Then Muhammad said, 'Pass judgment on them.' Sa'd replied, 'I
pass judgment that their men shall be killed, their women and children
made
captives, and their property divided.' Allah's Apostle proclaimed, 'You
have
passed judgment on the Jews with the judgment of Allah and the judgment of
His Messenger.'" The Unholy Trinity was pleased.
It's im****tant for you to know that I have re****ted every Hadith collected
by Tabari, Ishaq, and Bukhari regarding the assault on the Jews. There
wasn't
a single word written about Jewish combatants. Three settlements, three
sieges, and yet the Jews never struck a blow-not one. There was no excuse.
There was no claim of self defense. This was a grotesque act of racially
inspired genocide. And the motivation was greed. The Jews embodied
everything the Muslims had failed to achieve. They were productive,
prosperous, moral, literate, peaceful, honest, discerning, and religious.
Bukhari collected a series of Hadith on this diabolical verdict:
Bukhari:V5B58N148-B59N447 "Sa'd came riding a donkey, and when he
approached
the mosque, the Prophet said, 'Get up for the best amongst you.' Then the
Apostle said, 'O Sa'd! These people have agreed to accept your verdict.'
Sa'd
said, 'I judge that their men should be killed and their offspring and
women
should be taken as captives.' The Prophet said, 'You have given a judgment
similar to Allah the King's Judgment.'" A second reveals:
Bukhari:V5B59N448
"They then surrendered to the Prophet's judgment but he directed them to
Sa'd
to give the verdict. Sad said, 'I give my judgment that their men should
be
killed, their women and children should be taken as captives, and their
properties distributed.'" A third proclaims: Bukhari:V5B59N362 "The Nadir
and Qurayza violated their peace treaty, so the Prophet exiled the Nadir
and
then he killed the Qurayza men. He distributed their women, children and
property among the Muslims." And what do you suppose the Muslim militants
did to their women? The Qur'an says that they forced them into
prostitution.
The Hadith says that they raped them. Bukhari:V5B59N459 "I entered the
Mosque, saw Abu, sat beside him and asked about ***. Abu Said said, 'We
went
out with Allah's Apostle and we received female slaves from among the
captives. We desired women and we loved to do coitus interruptus.'" (Yes,
that's what it says.)
Another Bukhari Hadith goes on to re****t that Muhammad never grew weary of
tormenting Jews: "He exiled all the Jews from Medina. They were the Jews
of
the Qaynuqa and the Jews of the Haritha and all the other Jews from their
homes."
With something this morally crippled, it's im****tant to know that there
are
many confirmations-each destroying the myth Muhammad was a prophet. His
Islam was a terrorist manifesto. It was conceived for rape and plunder.
And
on this day it was doing what it did best. Tabari VIII:34 "Sa'd turned
away
from the Messenger out of respect. He said, 'I pass judgment that the men
shall be killed, the property divided, and the children and women made
slaves.' Muhammad replied, 'You have passed judgment on them with the
judgment of Allah from above seven heavens.'"
The chorus continues with this refrain: Tabari VIII:39 "After the affair
of
the Qurayza ended, the wound of Sa'd broke open. Aisha re****ts: He passed
judgment on the Jews and prayed saying, 'O Allah, You know that there are
no
men whom I would rather fight and strive to kill than men who called Your
Messenger a liar.'"
Before we review what happened next, I want to share the verses I omitted
earlier from the 33rd surah: the model for the Holocaust: 033.026 "Allah
took down the People of the Scripture Book. He cast terror into their
hearts. Some you slew, and some you made prisoners. And He made you heirs
of
their lands, their houses, and their goods, giving you a land which you
had
not traversed before. And Allah has power over all things." Version two:
"And He drove the People of the Scripture down from their homes and cast
panic into their hearts. Some you killed, and you made some captive. And
He
caused you to inherit their farms, houses, wealth, and land you have not
trodden. Allah is ever Able to do all things." This Qur'anic verse is
among
Islam's most stinging indictments. It confirms its most barbaric act.
But it's worse than it appears on the surface. Since it was Muhammad who
actually perpetrated these crimes, it confirms that Muhammad was Allah.
Allah was never anything more than a rock idol, the Black Stone stuck in
the
wall of the Ka'aba. Muhammad created his persona and his revelations. And
that is why Muhammad's personality, character, behavior, and words are
identical to Allah's. But Muhammad had help. Lucifer, just as Paul had
warned, transformed himself into an angel of light. Pretending to be
Gabriel, he struck a bargain with the insecure and covetous Arab. In the
exchange, Muhammad was possessed by Lucifer's most able demon. Working
together, the Unholy Trinity established the religion of deceit, death,
and
damnation.
Muhammad's behavior was covetous, ruthless, and murderous to be sure. Yet
attributing this debauchery to deity was his most vile act. Men have
plundered before. Men have robbed before. Men have murdered before. But no
god has ever said: "'God' drove the unbelievers back in fury, and they
gained no advantage. Allah was sufficient to help the believers in battle.
He made the People of the Book descend from their homes, and He terrorized
them, so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you
inherit
their property, homes, wealth, and a country you had not trodden under
foot
before."
In the first chapter I included a speech from the Islamic world's leading
imam. Al-Buraik, the Saudi ruling family's favorite sheik, spoke at a
telethon the Fahd family dictators hosted to enrich the families of
Palestinian suicide bombers. This esteemed Islamic cleric said, "O,
Muslims,
don't take Jews and Christians as allies. Muslim brothers in Palestine do
not have any mercy or compassion on the Jews, their blood, their money, or
their flesh. Their women are yours to take, legitimately. Allah made them
yours. Why don't you enslave their women? Why don't you wage jihad? Why
don't
you pillage them?" Now you know where he got his material.
And this was the result: Tabari VIII:35/Ishaq:464 "The Jews were made to
come down, and Allah's Messenger imprisoned them. Then the Prophet went
out
into the marketplace of Medina (it is still its marketplace today), and he
had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded
in
those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800
to 900 boys and men." The lone prophet of the Islamic religion had the
imprisoned Jews brought to him so that he might enjoy the ghoulish
spectacle. Even Hitler was too ashamed to visit Auschwitz.
Then in words hauntingly similar to what Jews must have asked as Nazi
trains
hauled their families off to concentration camps: "As they were being
taken
in small groups to the Prophet, they said to one another, 'What do you
think
will be done to us?' Someone said, 'Do you not understand. On each
occasion
do you not see that the summoner never stops? He does not discharge
anyone.
And that those who are taken away do not come back. By God, it is death!'
The affair continued until the Messenger of Allah had finished with them
all." If 900 men and boys were dragged out of their imprisonment in
"batches" and led into the central market square of Medina to be beheaded
in front of Muhammad, the "affair" would have lasted eight to ten hours.
Imagine a "prophet" perverted enough to watch until he had "finished with
them all." It's enough to make you vomit.
Surely, he could not have been this twisted. Tabari VIII:40 "The Messenger
of God commanded that furrows should be dug in the ground for the Qurayza.
Then he sat down. Ali and Zubayr began cutting off their heads in his
presence." Muhammad was a prophet of a different color.
Tabari VIII:35/Ishaq:464 "Huyayy, the enemy of Allah, was brought out. He
was wearing a rose-colored suit of clothes that he had torn all over with
fingertip-sized holes so that it would not be taken as booty. His hands
were
bound to his neck with a rope. When he looked at Muhammad he said, 'I do
not
regret opposing you. Whoever forsakes God will be damned.' He sat down and
was beheaded." The rabbi synthesized the Bible into a single sentence,
"Whoever forsakes (separates) himself from Yahweh will be damned
(separated)
from him." In the Scriptures, forsaken, damned, and separated are
synonymous. This fine man chose not to separate himself from Yahweh and
wor****p his adversary Satan, so he lost his life but saved his soul.
Huyayy
is now living eternally with his Creator. Muhammad, the recipient of this
message forsook Yahweh and damned himself-choosing instead to form an
alliance with Lucifer. Today, Muhammad's soul is eternally damned in the
place of separation, called hell-Satan's paradise.
Ishaq:464/Tabari VIII:36 "According to Aisha, one Jewish woman was killed.
By Allah, she was by my side, talking with me and laughing while Allah's
Messenger was killing her men in the marketplace." Psychologists call this
a
"gallows laugh." It's a common manifestation of extreme stress. So while
the
reaction of the Jewish woman was excused, the behavior of the Muslim men
is
not. They were forcing Qurayza women to watch as they severed the heads of
their fathers, husbands, brothers, and sons. The level of human depravity
depicted here wouldn't replayed again for 1300 years. Muhammad's
apprentice,
Adolf Hitler, forced Jews to remove their kin from cyanide showers, only
to
place them in the roaring fires of his crematorium. Doctrines demented
enough to compel such behavior cannot be tolerated. While the Pope may
wish
to kiss the Qur'an, I'd prefer to spit on it. But then again, the Pope was
wrong about Hitler, too.
Ishaq:464/Tabari VIII:36 "Suddenly an unseen voice called out her name. It
said, 'Where is so and so?' She said, 'Here I am.' 'Good heavens,' I
cried,
'what is wrong?' She said, 'I am going to be killed because of something I
did.' She was taken away and beheaded. Aisha used to say, 'I shall never
forget my wonder at her good spirits, even when she knew she would be
killed.'" The witness of Jews continues to be remarkable.
Tabari VIII:37 "Thabit said, 'O Allah's Messenger, Zabir, who was Abu
Ar-Rahman, did me a favor, sparing my life, and I owe him a debt of
gratitude. I wish to repay him for it. Grant me his life.' The Prophet
said,
'It is yours.'" The source of this Hadith wants to make sure Muslims
didn't
equate this act of "mercy" with the "prophet" being soft on Jews. That is
why he said that this man's real name was
"Slave-to-Muhammad's-First-God-Ar-Rahman."
Ishaq:465 "So Thabit went to him and Zabir said, 'Why do this? I'll be an
old man without family and children.' Thabit asked Muhammad for his family
and he said, 'His wife and children are yours.' But Zabir said, 'Without
my
property, how will we survive?" So Thabit asked the Prophet for Zabir's
wealth and it was given to him. Thabit went to Zabir and announced that he
had been given all of his property. Zabir said, 'Thabit, you are
two-faced.
What has happened to Asad?' 'He has been beheaded.' 'How about Huyayy?'
'He
has been killed.' And how fares Azzal?' 'He has been slain.' 'How about
the
rest of the Qurayza men?' Thabit said, 'They have all gone to their
death.'
Zabir said, 'Then for the sake of the favor I once did for you, there is
no
good in living anymore. So Thabit brought him forward, and they struck off
his head. When what he said was re****ted to Abu Bakr, he replied, 'He will
soon meet his dear ones in the fires of Hell, and there they will dwell
forever.'"
In the most tortured words ever uttered in the name of religion: Tabari
VIII:38 "The Messenger of Allah commanded that all of the Jewish men and
boys who had reached puberty should be beheaded. Then the Prophet divided
the wealth, wives, and children of the Banu Qurayza Jews among the
Muslims."
Ishaq:465 "When their wrists were bound with cords, the Apostle was a sea
of
generosity to us." It's hard to imagine evil this dark.
Further confirming that he was a terrorist and pirate, not a messenger or
prophet, Muhammad's first biographer said: Ishaq:465 "Then the Apostle
divided the property, wives, and children of the Qurayza among the
Muslims.
Allah's Messenger took his fifth of the booty. He made known on that day
the
extra shares for horses and their riders -giving the horse two shares and
the rider one. A Muslim without a horse got one share of the spoil. It was
the first booty in which lots were cast." Why lots, you may be wondering?
Casting lots is a gambling game, one expressly forbidden by Islam. The
reason is two fold. First, the religion of Islam was a joke to these
fellows. They simply used it as a tool to justify their disgusting
behavior.
The first Muslims were less religious than Hitler's S.S. Second, the
mercenaries needed a picking order in which to draft Jewish homes,
property,
businesses, women, and children. Muhammad didn't want them squabbling.
Some
*** slaves were prettier than others.
In the name of full disclosure, here is the re****t of Islam's first
historian: Tabari VIII:38 "On that day Muhammad made known the shares of
the
horsemen and shares of the foot soldiers, and he deducted from these
shares
his fifth. A horseman received three shares: two shares for the horse and
one for its rider. A foot soldier received one share. The cavalry at the
battle with the Qurayza numbered thirty-six horses. It was the first booty
in which shares were allotted to them. According to this example (Sunnah),
the procedure of the Messenger of Allah in the divisions of booty became a
precedent which was followed in subsequent raids." Every Islamic apologist
could cry out for a thousand years and not undo the damage done by
Muhammad
and his militants. We put ourselves, our men, women, and children, into
harm's
way when we allow Islam to masquerade as a legitimate religion.
Fundamental
Islam is no different than fundamental Nazism. These crimes must not go
unpunished.
As further evidence that militant Islam is fundamental Islam, and that the
Islam of Muhammad was built upon the slave trade, we find: Tabari VIII:39
"Then the Messenger of Allah sent Sa'd bin Zayd with some of the Qurayza
captives to Najd, and in exchange for them he purchased horses and arms."
Nothing could be more clear. Hitler financed his war machine on booty he
stole from the Jews. In slave labor camps he forced Jews to work without
pay
building planes, tanks, and bombs. Muhammad set the precedent, funding his
war effort on the flesh and property of Jews. These men and their methods
were identical. And one day, in the not too distant future, this misguided
doctrine will be unleashed on a world comprised of six billion souls.
Replete with nuclear and biological weapons, a billion people will perish.
The reason Allah approved rape, involuntary *** with prisoners, in the
33rd
surah was because Muhammad was about to indulge. Tabari VIII:38 "The
Prophet
selected for himself from among the Jewish women of the Qurayza, Rayhanah
bt. Amr. She became his concubine. When he predeceased her, she was still
in
his possession. When the Messenger of Allah took her as a captive, she
showed herself averse to Islam and insisted on Judaism." Imagine the
horror
of being the *** slave of the man who had murdered your father and your
brothers. Imagine being forced to have *** with a man who had given your
mother up to be raped and had sold your sisters into slavery to buy swords
so that he could torment others. It's chilling-perversity on an
unimaginable
scale. Muhammad may well have been the most vile human to have ever lived.
The first to chronicle the prophet's revolting life explains: Ishaq:466
"The
Apostle [taking first dibs] chose one of the Jewish women for himself. Her
name was Rayhana. She remained with him until she died, in his power. The
Apostle proposed to marry her and put the veil on her but she said, 'Leave
me under your power, for that will be easier. She showed a repugnance
towards Islam when she was captured." Muhammad raped Rayhana after
killing,
enslaving, and plundering her family. If you want to understand the
doctrine
of submission, put yourself in her sandals and gaze deeply into the eyes
of
the man who is abusing you.
Ishaq:466 "Allah sent down [a Qur'an surah] concerning the Trench and
Qurayza raid. The account is found in the Confederates or Allied Troops.
In
it He mentions their trial and His kindness to the Muslims. 'Remember We
sent a wind against the armies and they could not see. Allah sent this
wind
with his angels. Allah said, When they came at you from above and below,
and
when eyes grew wild and hearts reached your throats, you harbored doubts
about Allah. Those in whose hearts is a disease said, 'What Allah and His
Messenger has promised us is nothing but delusion.''"
Before I comment, let's read on: Ishaq:467 "Allah addressed the believers
and said, 'In Allah's Apostle you have a fine example for anyone who hopes
to be in the place where Allah is.'" Ishaq:468 "Then Allah said, 'Some of
you have fulfilled your vow to Me by dying; you have finished your work
and
returned to Me like those who sought martyrdom in prior battles. And some
of
you are still waiting to capitalize on Allah's promise of martyrdom. You
do
not hesitate in your religion and never doubt.'" Ishaq:468 "Allah brought
down the People of the Scripture Book. I forced the Qurayza from their
homes
and cast terror into their hearts. Some you slew, and some you took
captive.
You killed their men and enslaved their women and children. And I caused
you
to inherit their land, their dwellings, and their property. Allah can do
all
things.'"
While I recognize that we have reviewed Allah's endorsement of genocide in
the 33rd surah, Ishaq's review of the Qur'an ties the Islamic god
irrevocably to the event. And there is no question that Ishaq's
interpretation of the surah -as the earliest and best researched-is the
most
credible in Islam. Moreover, when Allah told Muslims to follow Muhammad's
example he was specifically encouraging terrorism, mass murder, piracy,
the
slave trade, and rape.
The Qur'an said that its dark spirit deployed killer angels. The first
Muslims harbored doubts about Allah. They believed that Muhammad's message
was delusional. Good Muslims vowed to die as martyrs killing infidels.
They
were mercenaries, as they expected a reward. Allah was presented as an
anti-Semite and a terrorist. Islam's "god" approved genocide and the
enslavement of women and children. He even confessed to being a pirate,
claiming to have caused Muslims to inherit stolen land, possessions, and
homes.
There is no other way to interpret these confessions or to explain them
away. The dark spirit, demented prophet, and delusional doctrine that
seduced men into perpetrating these heinous acts must be exposed,
repudiated, and then banished from the earth. Or tomorrow, men following
Muhammad's example will terrorize you, forcing you into submission. They
will rape, rob, enslave, and kill your family. And while the Islamic
terrorists will earn their just reward for following Muhammad's
example-"going
to the place where Allah is"-the pain they will inflict cannot be undone.
The first Muslims were proud of themselves. Ishaq:468 "Gabriel came to the
Apostle when Sa'd was taken. He visited him in the middle of the night
wearing an embroidered turban and said, 'O Muhammad, who is this dead man
for whom the doors of heaven have been opened and at whom the throne
shook?'"
Since Gabriel is "credited" with revealing the Qur'an to Muhammad, it's
odd
that he would need to ask the "messenger" about something that happened in
heaven. And Sa'd was a thug, a man who loved to kill. He was a racist and
a
thief. If these behaviors rock Allah's throne, the Islamic god is a rather
nasty fellow.
Ishaq:468 "Sa'd was a fat man but those who carried his funeral bier said
that they had never carried a lighter one. Muhammad said, 'He had angelic
pallbearers because the angels rejoiced when Sa'd's spirit shook Allah's
throne.'" Ishaq:469 "An Ansar recited this poem: 'The throne of Allah
shook
for only one man: Sa'd the brave and bold, a glorious leader, a knight
ever
ready. Stepping into the battle, he cut heads to pieces." Saint Sa'd, a
genuine Muslim hero. Ishaq:469 "The Apostle said, 'Every wailing woman
lies
except those who wept for Sa'd.'" Tabari VIII:40 "Aisha, the Mother of the
Faithful, was asked, 'How did the Messenger of God behave?' She replied,
'His eye did not weep for anyone.'" Der prophet and der fuhrer were cut
from
the same cloth.
Ishaq:469 "On the day the Qurayza were slain, one Muslim was martyred. A
stone was thrown on him and it inflicted a shattering wound. The Apostle
said, 'He will have the reward of two martyrs.'" In Islam you get bonus
points for killing, robbing, and enslaving Jews.
These poetic lines were recited during the Islamic Holocaust: Ishaq:470
"We
attacked them fully armed, sharp swords in hand, cutting through heads and
skulls." This could serve as Islam's byline: Ishaq:471 "We were steadfast
trusting in Him. We have a Prophet by whom we will conquer all men." All
means all, that's all "all" means. So this could serve as Islam's byline:
"We have a Prophet by whom we will conquer all men."
Ishaq:472 "Muhammad's Companions are the best in war." Ishaq:473 "Muhammad
and his Companions humiliated every doubter." Ishaq:475 "Allah commanded
that horses should be kept for His enemy in the fight so they might vex
them. We obeyed our Prophet's orders when he called us to war. When he
called for violent efforts we made them. The Prophet's command is obeyed
for
he is truly believed. He will give us victory, glory, and a life of ease.
Those who call Muhammad a liar disbelieve and go astray. They attacked our
religion and would not submit." The last was a full service sonnet. It
contained an incentive to amass weapons and incentive to use them, a
command
to annoy the enemy and a command to fight them. It encouraged and
acknowledged violence. It even admitted that violence was perpetrated for
money-to gain a life of ease.
Ishaq:479 "Slain in Allah's religion, Sa'd inherits Paradise with the
martyrs. His was a noble testimony. When he pronounced his verdict on the
Qurayza, he did not judge on his own volition. His judgment and Allah's
were
one. Sa'd is among those who sold his life for the Garden of Bliss."
Considering the verdict called for genocide, larceny, and enslavement,
Allah's
complicity in these crimes is bothersome.
This, too, is hideous: Ishaq:481 "The Apostle slew them in their own town.
With our troops he surrounded their homes. We shouted out cries in the
heat
of battle. The Jews were given the Scripture and wasted it. Being blind,
[the illiterate man said] they strayed from the Torah. You Jews
disbelieved
the Qur'an and yet you have tasted the confirmation of what it said. May
Allah make our raid on them immortal. May fire burn in their quarter. They
will no longer ruin our lands. You [Jews] have no place here, so be off!"
I saved the worst for last.Ishaq:480 "The Qurayza met their misfortune
[now
there's an understated word]. In humiliation they found no helper. A
calamity worse than that which fell upon the Nadir befell them. On that
day
Allah's Apostle came to them like a brilliant moon. We left them with
blood
upon them like a pool. They lay prostrate with the vultures circling
round."
Here is one more story. It is very similar to the previous one. And it is
similar to the photo essay on Islam which prompted me to share them both
with you.
Year seven of the Islamic Era got off to a horrendous start. The prophet,
without provocation, led a terrorist raid to torment another Jewish
community. Tabari VIII:116/Ishaq:510 "After his return from Hudaybiyah,
Allah's Messenger marched against Khaybar. He halted with his army in a
valley between the people of Khaybar and the Ghatafan tribe to prevent the
latter from assisting the Jews." The motivation for the attack was
obvious.
Muhammad's militant and mercenary horde was up in arms over his
capitulation
at Hudaybiyah. Out of control, they would have turned against their
warlord
if he hadn't found a way to satiate their growing lust for blood, babes,
and
booty.
For those who think this conclusion is unfair and overly cynical, consider
the facts. When the Muslims failed to capture the Meccan caravan at Badr,
the prophet stole property and possessions of the Qaynuqa Jews. Following
the Uhud defeat, he immediately plundered the Nadir Jews. The siege of the
Trench was not only the third in a series of four battles without booty;
it
was also bloodless. So Islam's demented dictator provided slaughter, ***,
and spoil by murdering, enslaving, and robbing the Qurayza. The Jews had
become easy prey. So following the bootyless and bloodless "peace" of
Hudaybiyah, Muhammad set out to terrorize the only Jewish community within
reach that he hadn't previously sacked and plundered-Khaybar. It was their
turn to feel the wrath of Islam.
Incidentally, neither Allah, Muhammad, Ishaq, Tabari, Bukhari, nor Muslim
made an attempt to justify Islam's ruthless assault on the Khaybar Jews.
They knew the truth and didn't try to disguise it. Islam was no longer a
religion; it was a terrorist dogma. The first Muslims weren't disciples;
they were mercenaries. Muhammad wasn't a prophet; he was a pirate. Allah
wasn't a god; he was the Devil incarnate. And together, they were about to
prove that they were a blight on humankind.
As transparent as ever, these words, directly from Muhammad's lips,
demonstrate that he was working for the Prince and the Power of the Air,
the
Lord of Devils, the Prince of Darkness, the Great Deceiver, the
Adversary-Satan. Ishaq:510 "When the Apostle looked down on Khaybar he
told
his Companions, 'O Allah, Lord of the heavens and what they overshadow,
and
Lord of the Devils and what into error they throw, and Lord of the winds
and
what they winnow, we ask Thee for the booty of this town and its people.
We
take refuge in Thee from its evil and the evil of its people. Forward in
the
name of Allah.' He used to say this of every town he raided."
Serving Lucifer was no easy task. Good and evil had to be redefined so
that
the good people of Khaybar, who were just going about their lives trying
to
make an honest living, had to be called "evil." And the bad terrorist
thugs
lurking in the hills above them, armed to the teeth and ready to pounce on
the on the unsuspecting village, murdering, enslaving, robbing, and
raping,
had to be called "good."
Ishaq:511 "When the Apostle raided a people he waited until morning, and
then he attacked. We came to Khaybar by night. When morning came and he
did
not hear the call to prayer, he rode and we rode with him. We met the
workers of Khaybar coming out in the morning with their spades and
baskets.
When they saw the Prophet and our army they cried, 'Muhammad with his
force.'
They turned tail and fled. The Apostle yelled, 'Allahu Akbar! Khaybar is
destroyed.' When we arrive at a people's square, it is a bad morning for
them."
All of the deceptions, justifications, and apologies ever spoken would be
insufficient to make this horrible day appear religious. And it does not
stand alone. Khaybar was but one of seventy-five merciless raids
instigated
by the first Muslims. Armed raiders attacked civilians for no other reason
than to seize their possessions. "Allahu Akbar!" was the terrorists'
"Prayer
of Fear."
Ibn Ishaq's compilation of Islamic scripture-the inspired Sira, or
biography
of the prophet-is the earliest and most accurate accounting of Muhammad's
life and of the formation of Islam. It was compiled a century before
Tabari,
Muslim, and Bukhari. But for those who might want to dismiss the Hadith
re****t on the basis that it sounds too condemning of the prophet, consider
these confirming words from imam Bukhari. Of his collection, Islamic sages
wrote: "Second only to the Qur'an, Bukhari's Hadith is the most im****tant
book in Islam." He claims: Bukhari:V5B59N510 "Allah's Apostle reached
Khaybar at night. It was his habit that, whenever he reached an enemy at
night, he would not attack them till it was morning. When morning came,
the
Jews came out with their spades and baskets. When they saw the Prophet,
they
said, 'Muhammad! O dear God! It's Muhammad and his army!' The Prophet
shouted, 'Allahu-Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a
nation, evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.'"
The more you know, the worse it gets. This is why Islamic leaders must
keep
good people from reading these words. It is why they lie to themselves, to
our citizens, the media, and politicians alike. Islam is self destructive,
mutilating its own credibility.
The Hadith said Muhammad made a "habit" of this perverse behavior. The
Jews
were his enemy, although none had lifted a finger in violence towards him.
The Jews were farmers, going to work with gardening tools, and yet
Muhammad
led a surprise "attack" against them with his "army." He professed
"destruction," not salvation. But it's his last line that's especially
haunting. With Islam, the nations of the world are approached by "evil."
Muhammad's ruthless terror campaign against the town****ps of Qurayza and
Khaybar was worse than Osama bin Laden's assault on New York and
Wa****ngton.
The first Islamic terrorist was more destructive, savage, and sadistic
than
his later-day incarnations in the Taliban, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Muslim
Brotherhood, Black September, Jemaah Islamiyah, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade,
al-Qaeda, and Islamic Jihad. And Muslims know it. In their media, in their
mosques, and in their madrassa, they compel young boys and girls to follow
Muhammad's example. When they bomb our buildings, blow holes in our ****ps,
hijack or planes, and kidnap our people, they are doing what their prophet
did. Islam cannot coexist with civilized people. It is a terrible disease.
Through indoctrination Islam destroys Muslim minds, corroding them. By way
of its grotesque immorality and criminal nature it attacks Muslim hearts,
corrupting them. Worst of all, by way of deceit and deception Islam
beguiles
Muslim souls, damning them.
To add insult to injury, Bukhari noted: Bukhari:V5B59N512 "The Prophet
offered the Fajr Prayer [the Prayer of Fear] near Khaybar when it was
still
dark. He said, 'Allahu-Akbar!' [Allah is Greatest] Khaybar is destroyed,
for
whenever we approach a hostile nation to fight, then evil will be the
morning for those who have been warned.' Then the inhabitants of Khaybar
came out running on their roads. The Prophet had their men killed; their
children and woman were taken as captives." Calling the Jews a hostile
nation is a farce. Muhammad and his Muslim militants, according to their
own
accounting, had either murdered, terrorized, enslaved, or raped
tens-of-thousands of Jews yet the Jews had killed but one Muslim. Even
that
was self defense, allegedly occurring during the Islamic siege of the
Qurayza.
The warning these Jews were given before evil befell them was no different
than Muslims provide today. The 9/11 terrorists shouted "Allahu Akbar"
before they slaughtered thousands. By proclaiming the Prayer of Fear,
Islamic terrorists tell us who they are, what they believe, who they
serve,
and why they kill.
There is nothing Islam could do to make their terrorist nature more
obvious.
Bukhari:V5B59N516 "When Allah's Apostle fought the battle of Khaybar, or
when he raided any other people, we raised their voices crying,
'Allahu-Akbar! Allahu-Akbar! None has the right to be wor****pped except
Allah.' [Muslims will continue to terrorize until every soul submits to
Islam.] On that Allah's Apostle said, 'Lower your voices, for you are not
calling a deaf or an absent one, but a Hearer Who is with you.' On that he
said to me, 'O Abdallah, shall I tell you a sentence which is one of the
treasures of Paradise?' I said, 'Yes, O Allah's Apostle! Let my father and
mother be sacrificed for your sake. [What an utterly perverse and odd
thing
to say.]' He said, 'It is: There is neither might nor power but with
Allah.'"
Then why, pray tell, did he require militants to kill and pillage for him?
Tabari VIII:116/Ishaq:511 "So Muhammad began seizing their herds and their
property bit by bit. He conquered Khaybar home by home. The first
stronghold
defeated was Naim. Next was Qamus, the community of Abi Huqayq. The
Messenger took some of its people captive, including Safiyah bt. Huyayy,
the
wife of Kinanah and her two cousins. The Prophet chose Safiyah for
himself."
Perverted is too kind a word for this man. He became the first serial
rapist
to call himself a prophet. And make no mistake; having *** with a captive
is
rape.
Tabari VIII:117 "Dihyah had asked the Messenger for Safiyah when the
Prophet
chose her for himself. Muhammad gave Dihyah her two cousins instead." It
was
a two for one deal. The prophet could be so considerate. Ishaq:511 "When
Dihyah protested, wanting to keep Safiyah for himself, the Apostle traded
for Safiyah by giving Dihyah her two cousins. The women of Khaybar were
distributed among the Muslims." Muhammad had men killed so that he could
have *** with their wives and daughters. He traded human beings. And the
"prophet" rewarded his Muslim militants by distributing the remaining
women
among them. Good Grief!
Faced with a problem, Muhammad used some magic to turn rape into an
approved
Islamic act. The slight of hand was called "the Mut'a." It was a three-day
"marriage" giving he and his militants a license to do with their
prisoners
whatever they pleased. But on this day, only the prophet's indiscretion
was
"approved." Bukhari:V5B59N527 "On the day of Khaybar, Allah's Apostle
forbade the Mut'a or tem****ary marriage."
Bukhari:V5B59N512 "The Prophet had their men killed, their children and
woman taken as captives. Safiyah was amongst the captives, She first came
in
the share of Dihyah but later on she came to belong to the Prophet.
Muhammad
made her manumission [Webster: "a Medieval word signifying the authority
of
a master to release one from slavery"] as her 'Mahr [wedding gift].'"
Translated into common English, Muhammad performed some Islamic hocus
pocus
to make nonconsensual *** seem moral. And that's all Islam was really. It
was just an act-an Oscar winning performance by one of the great con
artists
of all time. The Bukhari Tradition winds down with these words: "The
captives of Khaybar were divided among the Muslims. Then the Messenger
began
taking the homes and property that were closest to him."
The prophet was busy establi****ng Islamic Sunnah, or custom, on this day.
Ishaq:512 "The Apostle prohibited four things the morning of the Khaybar
raid: carnal intercourse with pregnant women who were captured, mingling
his
seed with another man's [which means the Muslims were free to rape those
who
weren't pregnant]; nor it is lawful for him to take [rape] her until she
is
in a state of cleanness [not menstruating]; nor can a Muslim eat the flesh
of donkeys; nor eat any carnivorous animal; nor sell any booty before it
has
been duly allotted." That's because the prophet took his cut off the top
and
didn't want it diminished. The Tradition continues to lay down the law:
"Nor
is it lawful for a Muslim to ride an animal belonging to the booty with
the
intention of returning it to the pool when he has worn it out; nor is it
lawful for him to wear a garment belonging to the booty of the Muslims
with
the intention of returning it to the pool [of stolen goods] when he has
reduced it to rags." If you desire to be a pirate, I suppose that these
might be words to live by.
Ishaq:512 "On the day of Khaybar, the Apostle forbade us to by or sell
gold
ore for gold coin or silver ore for silver coin." He who controls the
bank,
the means of commerce and trade, controls men by way of their wallets.
Before we leave this rather dismal attempt to establish Islamic law, I
want
to solve the perplexing donkey conundrum. It's no small matter to Muslims.
There are no fewer than a dozen Bukhari Hadiths from this day alone were
focused on the lowly ass. Let's see if we can figure out why.
Bukhari:V5B59N526 "On the day of Khaybar Allah's Apostle forbade the
eating
of garlic and the meat of donkeys." That wasn't much help; all it did was
demonstrate that Muhammad was a fool. Garlic is nature's best antibiotic
and
thus should be consumed. But Muhammad wasn't much of a medicine man. This
trio of prescriptions should tell the tale: Bukhari:V7B71N590 "The climate
of Medina did not suit some people so the Prophet ordered them to drink
camel urine as a medicine." And when that made them even sicker,
Bukhari:V7B71N592 "I heard Allah's Apostle saying, 'There is healing in
black cumin for all diseases except death.'" And lest we forget:
Bukhari:V7B71N673 "Allah's Apostle said, 'If a fly falls in your drink,
dip
all of it into the cup and then throw it away, for in one of its wings
there
is a disease and in the other there is healing, an antidote or treatment
for
that disease.'"
But foolish did not make him frivolous. The next Tradition provides a clue
as to why he was upset. Bukhari:V5B59N511 "Someone came to Allah's Apostle
and said, 'Donkeys have been eaten by Muslims.' The Prophet kept quiet.
The
man again and said, 'Their donkeys have been eaten.' The Prophet kept
quiet.
After the third time the Prophet ordered his caller to announce, 'Allah
and
His Apostle forbid you to eat the meat of donkeys.' Then the cooking pots
were overturned while the meat was still boiling in them."
I discovered the clue when I read this: Bukhari:V5B59N531 "We were
afflicted
with severe hunger the day we raided Khaybar. While the cooking pots were
boiling and the food was ready to eat, the announcer of the Prophet said,
'Do not eat anything, especially the donkey-meat. Turn your cooking pots
upside down and throw it away.' We realized that the Prophet had
prohibited
such food because the Khumus had not been taken out of it." The "Khumus"
or
"Kumis" is the prophet's share of all booty seized by Muslim militants.
The
donkeys belonged to the Jews. They were beasts of burden used to till
fields
and carry crops to market. Thus they were a spoil to be divided, with
Muhammad getting the largest share. And he would rather see his people
starve than renounce his claim to stolen property.
The first Islamic historian and biographer each re****t a Hadith along the
same lines: Tabari VIII:117/Ishaq:512 "The Banu Sahm of Aslam [newly
recruited Muslim militants] came to the Messenger and complained,
'Muhammad,
we have been hurt by drought and possess nothing.' Although they had
fought
for the Prophet they found he had nothing [he was willing] to give them.
The
Apostle said, 'O Allah, You know their condition-I have no strength and
nothing [I want] to give them [from the booty I have stolen]. So conquer
for
them the wealthiest of the Khaybar homes, the ones with the most food and
fat meat.'" In other words, "Steal your own booty. You'll starve before I
share any of my confiscated wealth with you."
Then, proving that Allah was a wannabe terrorist too: Tabari VIII:117 "The
next morning Allah opened the town****p of Sa'b bin Mu'adh for them to
conquer. There was no stronghold in Khaybar more abounding in food. After
the Prophet had defeated some of their settlements and taken their
property,
they reached the communities of Watib and Sulalim, which were the last of
the Khaybar neighborhoods to be conquered. Muhammad besieged the
inhabitants
between thirteen and nineteen nights." Calling Islam "peaceful" ranks as
one
of the most egregious lies of all time. This wasn't even war. The Muslims
weren't out defending themselves or their religion. This was a terrorist
raid with a racist bent.
While Islam has always been violent, Muslims have seldom been good at it.
Ishaq:514/Tabari VIII:119 "Encamped at their fortress, Muhammad presented
his war banner to Abu Bakr and sent him against the Jews. He fought but he
retreated, suffering losses. The following morning the same thing happened
to Umar. When they returned to Muhammad, Umar's companions accused him of
cowardice, and he accused them of the same. The Messenger said, 'Tomorrow
I
shall give the banner to a man who loves Allah and His Messenger. Allah
will
conquer it by his means.' The next day Bakr and Umar vied for the war
banner, but the Prophet called Ali, who was suffering from inflamed eyes,
and, having spat on his eyes, gave him the banner. Ali advanced upon the
people of Khaybar. In the fight he lost his ****eld so he laid hold of the
fort door and used it as a ****eld. He kept it in his hand as he fought
until
Allah gave Muslims the victory. When the siege was over eight of us tried
to
lift he door but we couldn't even turn it over." Either the skinny-legged
fat boy of Mecca got a personal trainer or he found a hell of a
propagandist.
A Bukhari Hadith starts off the same way but ends oddly. Bukhari:V5B59N521
"On the day of Khaybar, Allah's Apostle said, 'Tomorrow I will give this
flag to a man through whose hands Allah will give us victory.. Ali said,
'O
Allah's Apostle! I will fight them till they become like us.' [Cruel?
Demonic? Mercenaries? Terrorists?] Allah's Apostle said, 'Proceed, and
when
you enter their town, call them to embrace Islam and inform them of
Allah's
Rights which they should observe, for if a single man is led on the right
path (of Islam) by Allah through you, then that will be better for you
than
nice red camels.'" I don't know what is more perverse: suggesting that the
victims of a terrorist raid should be called to Islam before they are
slaughtered, robbed, enslaved, and raped, or suggesting that a man's soul
is
better than "nice red camels?"
Moving on, the Sunnis wanted us to know that Abu Bakr and Umar were no
less
brutal. Tabari VIII:119 "The Messenger often had migraines and would
remain
a day or two without coming out. When Muhammad encamped at Khaybar, he
came
down with a migraine and did not come out. Bakr took the Prophet's war
banner and fought vigorously. Next Umar took it, fought with even more
ferociously than the first fighting."
Then, in some of the most despicable words ever scribed in the name of
religion: Tabari VIII:121/Ishaq:515 "Ali struck the Jew with a swift blow
that split his helmet, neck protector, and head, landing in his rear
teeth.
And the Muslims entered the city. Muhammad conquered Qamus, the [Jewish]
neighborhood of Abi Huqayq. Safiyah bt. Huyayy was brought to him, and
another woman with her. Bilal led them past some of the Jews we had slain
including the woman's dead husband. When she saw them, the woman with
Safiyah cried out, slapped her face, and poured dust on her head. When
Allah's
Prophet saw her, he said, 'Take this she-devil away from me!'" Grieving
for
those who had been butchered as a result of Islam was beyond Muhammad.
This
woman cried as she was dragged past the mutilated corpses of her family
and
friends. Yet the man who had led the terrorist raid so that he could steal
their possessions called the victim a "devil."
I dare say that when you began this journey you did not expect Islam to be
this bad. This is a special kind of evil. Muhammad terrorized, plundered,
and murdered while professing to be God's Messenger. That, in my opinion,
made him the most wretched man to have ever lived.
Yes, I know that the Crusades and Inquisition were brutal, and that
Protestantism was born out of a lust for power, ***, and money, but it's
not
the same-not even remotely. The clerics and kings that conspired together
to
control their subjects, hid the Bible and perverted its message. They were
misguided hypocrites who used religion to satiate their own cravings.
Muhammad, by contrast, claimed to speak for God. He didn't corrupt
Islam-he
made Islam as perverted as the spirit that possessed him.
Therefore, Muhammad's legacy haunts us today. It pains me beyond words to
look into the eyes of a Muslim woman or child trapped in Islam. There is
almost no way to reach them. And if this tortures my soul, what must it do
to our Creator? Islam, the curse of Muhammad, has damned over two billion
men and women. It has left nothing but death and destruction, poverty and
despair, persecution and indoctrination, terror and deceit in its wake.
Muhammad was the Prophet of Doom.
This beast of a man was now totally out of control. Tabari
VIII:122/Ishaq:515 "Muhammad commanded that Safiyah should be kept behind
him and he threw his cloak over her. Thus the Muslims knew that he had
chosen her for himself."
Moving on with the saga of the only "religion" to be born in a milieu of
grotesque immorality, piracy, and terror we are about to add torture to
its
list of hate crimes. Tabari VIII:122/Ishaq:515 "Abi Huqayq [Safiyah's
father] held the treasure of the Nadir [the second Jewish tribe Muhammad
exiled from Yathrib]. He was brought to Allah's Messenger, and he
questioned
him. But Huqayq denied knowing where it was. So the Prophet questioned
other
Jews. One said, 'I have seen Kinanah [Safiyah's husband] walk around a
ruin.'
Muhammad had Kinanah brought to him and said, 'Do you know that if we find
it, I shall kill you.' 'Yes,' Kinanah answered." This was Muhammad's
second
assault on the Nadir. He had stolen their homes, businesses, and land the
year after he banished the Qaynuqa, a year before he slaughtered the
Qurayza. All the Nadir had left was what they had been able to carry on
their backs.
And remember, this accounting of events is from the Islamic Hadith. There
is
no other source of information from which a different impression may be
drawn. Not a word concerning this man's life or deeds was chronicled
within
250 years of his death apart from these books. Therefore, the Muhammad of
Islam, the first Muslims, and the formation of the religion are just as
you
are seeing them here. Alternate theories have nothing to stand on.
With each act of violence, Islam's lone prophet became more gluttonous,
callous, heinous, and ultimately, insane. Tabari VIII:122/Ishaq:515 "The
Prophet commanded that the ruin should be dug up. Some treasure was
extracted from it. Then Muhammad asked Kinanah for the rest. He refused to
surrender it; so Allah's Messenger gave orders concerning him to Zubayr,
saying, 'Torture him until you root out and extract what he has. So Zubayr
kindled a fire on Kinanah's chest, twirling it with his firestick until
Kinanah was near death. Then the Messenger gave him to Maslamah, who
beheaded him."
Torturing a man whose home and property he had stolen twice, and whose
wife
he was about to rape, demoted Muhammad from a bloodthirsty terrorist and
pirate to a demonic sadist. Anyone who promotes Muhammad's verbal diarrhea
as scripture, Muhammad's life as exemplary, or Muhammad's war manifesto as
a
peaceful religion, is no better than the degenerate who began it all
simply
to satiate his cravings.
It's time we shed our ignorance, and admit the truth about Islam. Three
score and three years ago, Pearl Harbor was a wakeup call. America
correctly
identified the enemy and declared war on Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany.
Had the nation, in the aftermath of the September 11th bombings of New
York
and Wa****ngton, protected its citizens by declaring war on fundamental
Islam
for having perpetrated that attack, the world would have been safer today.
By defending ourselves intelligently against those who attacked us, the
legal context for rebuking the hateful and violent religotic of Islam
would
have been established, as well as the ability to legally silence the
deadly
doctrine's most vocal advocates.
Under those circumstances, anyone guilty of seducing lost souls, be it in
the media, madras or mosque, into the clutches of this poligious dogma
could
have been identified and punished. Ignoring Islam and going after al-Qaeda
is akin to targeting Hitler's S.S. instead of Nazism, or targeting
Kamikazes
instead of the belief system that turned them into suicidal killing
machines. If we continue to fight the symptoms of this disease, like the
fascist Baath party in Iraq and organizations like al-Qaeda, the real
villain-Islam-will manufacture more terrorists than the world can endure.
And while I do not advocate murder, the most compassionate thing we could
do
is to silence, sideline, and defang Islamic clerics and warlords in the
context of a justifiable defensive campaign to prevent them from sending
thousands, if not millions, to their doom.
Tabari VIII:123/Ishaq:515 "Allah's Apostle besieged the final [Jewish]
community of Khaybar until they could hold out no longer. Finally, when
they
were certain that they would perish, they asked Muhammad to banish them
and
spare their lives, which he did. The Prophet took possession of all their
property." Before you look at this as an act of mercy, allowing people to
live that he had nearly starved to death, you should know it was really
economics. By getting the Jews to surrender, Muhammad claimed the entire
spoil for himself.
Ishaq:515 "When the people of Fadak heard of what had happened, they sent
word to the Messenger, asking him to banish them and spare their lives,
saying they too would leave him their property. When the people of Khaybar
surrendered on these conditions, the survivors asked Muhammad to employ
them
on their farms for a half share of whatever they produced. They said, 'We
know more about farming [seeing that you are terrorists and all].' So
Muhammad made peace with them for a half share, provided that: 'If we want
to expel you, we may.' He made a similar arrangement with Fadak. So
Khaybar
became the prey of the Muslims, while Fadak belonged exclusively to the
Messenger of Allah, becoming his personal property, because the Muslims
had
not attacked its people with cavalry." "Prey" is an apt description of
what
the Jews were to the first Muslims.
And it was to be a never-ending assault. Bukhari:V4B53N380 "Umar expelled
all the Jews and Christians from Arabia. Allah's Apostle after conquering
Khaybar thought of expelling the Jews from the land which, after he
conquered it, belonged to Allah, Allah's Apostle and the Muslims. But the
Jews requested Allah's Apostle to leave them there on the condition that
they would do the labor and get half of the fruits (the land would yield).
Allah's Apostle said, 'We shall keep you on these terms as long as we
wish.'
Thus they stayed till the time of Umar's Caliphate when he expelled them."
I recognize that this is hard to believe. It's so inconsistent with our
popular view of prophets and religions. Yet the bloodied and broken bodies
of the Khaybar Jews, like the Qurayza before them, reveal what Islam does
to
men. Pure, fundamental, original, and uncorrupted Islam turned men into
terrorists. They became as immoral as the beast who seduced them.
As additional proof, I offer one of the most startling Hadiths in Islam:
Bukhari:V4B52N143 "The Prophet told an Ansar, 'Choose one of your slave
boys
to serve me in my expedition to Khaybar.' So, he chose me, even though I
was
just nearing puberty. I served Muhammad when he stopped to rest. I heard
him
saying repeatedly, 'Allah! I seek refuge with you from distress and
sorrow,
from helplessness and laziness, from miserliness and cowardice, from being
heavily in debt and from being overcome by men.'" This was how Muhammad
saw
himself, and in fact, it was what he had become.
Muhammad was stressed-out, helpless, and lazy. He was a miser. Never
having
actually earned a dime in his life, Muhammad had no way to value capital
or
labor. He was always in debt, no matter how much he stole. The economic
plight of the Islamic world is a direct result of Muhammad's unwillingness
to engage in honest work. It is why the Islamic nations remain the world's
least productive. In fact, Muslims as a whole are destructive
economically,
stifling far more commerce than they inspire.
And that's because their leader was a pirate. Islam was financed by stolen
booty and the slave trade. As parasites, they survived by sucking every
productive host within a camel's ride dry. The Bedouins of Arabia were
poor,
and while the Jews were a tasty treat, Islam would soon sink its fangs
into
a more plentiful prey. Within a year, Muhammad would attack the
Byzantines.
Within three, his Companions would subdue Arabia in the War of Compulsion,
taxing everyone. Within a decade the first Muslims would conquer Yemen,
Persia, Egypt, Syria, and Judea. Within a century, the sword of Islam
would
be wielded above the necks of millions. And it was all for money. They
plundered and raped to be sure, but their principle tools were the zakat
and
jizyah taxes, which they imposed on all people rich and poor.
But most of all, Muhammad was coward, as are all Islamic imams today. They
are ever ready to send others to their death, but never willing to fight
themselves. They corrupt boys with promises of virginal rewards while they
remain in the comfort and safety of mosque and madrasa. Like most
loud-mouthed bullies, Muhammad, and those who followed him, found pleasure
in tormenting the defenseless.
And with each passing day it became evident that Muhammad had lost control
of himself and that he was "overcome by men." The Medina surahs have been
fixated on attacking deserters. Orders to submit and obey dominate his
final
revelations. As men sought freedom and peace, Muhammad reacted by becoming
more dictatorial and warlike. As a result, Islamic nations are the
least-free places on earth. In the land of submission there are no true
democracies, no freedom of religion, of the press, of speech, or travel.
One
billion Muslims struggle to survive in countries brutalized by tyrants and
dictators. And it's not hard to see why. The first Muslims emulated their
warlord, becoming increasingly belligerent, callous, and brutal.
So, that leads us to a very unattractive place. As a direct result of
Muhammad's personal failings the Islamic world is devoid of everything
civilized people hold dear. Muslims wallow in poverty. Life isn't worth
living. They have no freedom of speech or religion. With the educational
process focused on Qur'anic studies, Muslims are among the most poorly
educated and most indoctrinated people on earth. Following the example of
a
perverted ***ist, Muslim men abuse women. And they are violent. Twenty
percent of the world's population is responsible for ninety percent of the
planet's upheaval-terror and war. If only twenty percent of Muslims are
"good" ones, then Islam makes them 2000% more violent than the rest of us.
Frankly, I don't see any benefit to any of this. Islam is a liability the
world could easily do without.
In the "Prologue" I shared a pair of quotes from Islamic scholars. This
might be a good time to review them in context of what we have learned.
What
may have once seemed extreme will now appear understated. Here is what Dr.
D.S. Margoliouth had to say: "The character attributed to Muhammad in the
biography of Ibn Ishaq is exceedingly unfavorable. In order to gain his
ends
Muhammad recoils from no expedient, and he approves of similar
unscrupulousness on the part of his adherents, when exercised in his
interest. He organizes assassinations and wholesale massacres. His career
as
the tyrant of Medina is that of a robber chief whose political economy
consists of securing and dividing plunder.. He is himself an unbridled
libertine [morally and ***ually unrestrained] and encourages the same
passion in his followers. For whatever he does he is prepared to plead the
express authorization of his deity. It is, however, impossible to find any
Islamic religious doctrine which he is not prepared to abandon in order to
secure a political end. At different points in his career he abandons the
unity of God and his claim to the title of Prophet. This is a disagreeable
picture for the founder of a religion, and it cannot be pleaded that it is
a
picture drawn by an enemy."
Renan wrote: "Muslims were the first victims of Islam. Many times I have
observed that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who
maintain others in the practice of this religion by terror. To liberate
the
Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him."
Y V Z M
Considering the nature of their prophet, it should be no surprise that the
Islamic world is such a mess. Bukhari:V4B52N143/V5B59N523 "When we
reached
Khaybar, Muhammad said that Allah had enabled him to conquer them. It was
then that the beauty of Safiyah was described to him. Her husband had been
killed [actually brutalized] , so Allah's Apostle selected her for
himself.
He took her along with him till we reached a place called Sad where her
menses were over and he took her for his wife, consummating his marriage
to
her, and forcing her to wear the veil.'"
Bukhari:V5B59N524 "The Muslims said among themselves, 'Will Safiyah be one
of the Prophet's wives or just a lady captive and one of his
possessions?'"
Muhammad was guilty of every *** crime known to man: pedophilia, *****,
rape, polygamy, adultery, womanizing, fornication, ***ism, and abetting
prostitution. Worst of all, he rewarded his mercenaries by dividing
captured
young girls among them. It's little wonder his Qur'anic paradise was so
perverted.
The Sira re****ts: Ishaq:517 "When the Apostle married [using a word
designed
to convey the nature of a moral and loving relation****p to this situation
is
repulsive] Safiyah on his way out of town, she was beautified and combed,
putting her in a fitting state for the Messenger. The Apostle passed the
night with her in his tent. Abu Ayyub, girt with his sword, guarded the
Apostle, going round the tent until he saw him emerge in the morning. Abu
said, 'I was afraid for you with this woman for you have killed her
father,
her husband, and her people." As an interesting aside, Safiyah, like
Jewish
Juwayriyah (the *** slave before her), bore the identity of her God in her
name.
Imagine for a moment, being Safiyah. You awaken one morning to find a gang
of godless pirates prowling the outskirts of your town. After rattling
their
sabers, you witness thousands of them performing a prostration "prayer."
You
recognize them, for they are the same men who threw you out of your home
in
Yathrib. Their bone-chilling shouts of "Allahu Akbar" pierce your soul.
Before you can run, the mercenaries swarm at you from every direction.
They
continue to howl as one thrusts a sword into your father's flesh; they
torture your husband, building a fire on his chest, ultimately
decapitating
him. They murder your father. Then they shackle your cousins, hauling them
away to become *** slaves. They ransack your home and strip the clothes
off
your family as they lay dying, all in a frenzied quest for booty.
Hiding behind a door, you're terrified. Then it happens. One of the
Muslims
spots you; a crazed demonic lust explodes on his face. He knocks you down,
pressing his knee against your back while he ties your hands to your neck.
You can hardly breathe. It's the worst moment of your life. The filthy,
lice-ridden militant fondles you, dragging you past the bloodied bodies of
your neighbors; you want to cry, to scream, but nothing comes out.
Then you see Muhammad, the man you've grown to hate, the repulsive
sixty-year-old animal responsible for this horror. He claims you as his
"prize," tossing his cloak over your head. His words, his very presence,
make your skin crawl. But as his slave you are helpless. He strips you of
whatever little dignity you have left. Then he conquers your body just as
he
ravaged your people.
Now, consider the insanity of a man who claimed to be "the Messenger of
God"
raping a woman whose town he had terrorized, savaged, plundered, and
enslaved. How could a man claim to be a "prophet" and yet be so demonic
and
sadistic, he would force a woman to have *** with him whose husband he had
tortured and then beheaded, whose father he had assassinated, and whose
cousins he had "given in trade" to one of his militants so that he might
possess her?
The problem with Muhammad isn't that he was the most vile bastard who ever
lived; it's his legacy. He perpetrated these heinous crimes while claiming
to be "the best example," "the ideal role model," an Apostle speaking on
behalf of God. This demented criminal established a new religion that has
damned the souls of over two billion people; he inspired terrorism, and
has
led the world to the brink of global war.
I do not know if any part of the following is accurate. However, if there
is
an element of truth, it was too little, too late. Every Jewish settlement
within Muhammad's reach had already been terrorized and plundered.
Bukhari:V5B59N551 "When Khaybar was conquered, a sheep containing poison,
was given as a present to Allah's Apostle" Tabari VIII:123/Ishaq:516 "When
the Messenger rested from his labor [which says that terrorism and piracy
were his chosen occupation], Zaynab, the wife of Sallam, served him a
roast
sheep. She had asked what part Muhammad liked best and was told that it
was
the shoulder and foreleg. So she loaded it with poison, also poisoning the
rest. Then she placed it before him. He took the foreleg and chewed it,
but
he did not swallow. With him was Bishr, who, like the Prophet, took some,
but he swallowed it. The Prophet spat out the lamb saying, 'This bone
informs me that it has been poisoned.'"
Talking bones and a gluttonous man spitting out his favorite celebratory
meal are a little farfetched. But there was a reason for including the
story. The cook was a Jew. The tale was concocted to infer that Khaybar
deserved to be sacked. No one had bothered to provide any justification
for
the initial attack.
"Muhammad summoned the woman, and she confessed. He asked, 'What led you
to
do this?'" This goon claimed he was a prophet, and yet he couldn't figure
this one out. Good grief. It's like Hitler asking a Polish Jew why he
wanted
him dead. "She said, 'You know full well what you have done to my
people.'"
It was as if Muhammad was surprised when folks were upset with his
terrorist
tactics. Caught up in his make-believe world, he had lost all sense of
reality.
This next Hadith is mindless propaganda. Tabari VIII:124/Ishaq:516 "The
Messenger, during the illness from which he died, said to the mother of
Bishr who had come in to visit him, 'Umm, at this very moment I feel my
aorta being severed because of the food I ate with your son at Khaybar.'"
Sure, that makes perfect sense. The poison he spit out years before killed
him. "The Muslims believed that in addition to the honor of prophethood,
the
Messenger died a martyr.'" Well, at least we know the reason for this
sorry
tale. Muslims who don't die martyrs have no chance of paradise. The
cowardly
terrorist needed to miscast his personal history to die a worthy death.
Tabari VIII:124/Ishaq:516/Bukhari:V5B59N541 "Having finished with Khaybar,
the Apostle went to Wadi Qura and besieged its people for a while. Then we
headed back to Medina, halting at Qura toward sunset. With Muhammad was a
slave lad of his whom Rifa'ah had given him. Suddenly, as we were setting
down the saddle of the Prophet, a stray arrow came and hit the slave boy,
killing him. We congratulated him, saying, 'May he enjoy Paradise!' But
Allah's Apostle said, 'Certainly not! The sheet of cloth on his back is
now
being burnt on him in the Hell Fire!' He pilfered it from the booty of the
Muslims following the Khaybar raid before it was duly distributed." You
apparently aren't allowed to steal anything that's already been stolen.
And there's a significant conflict between Muhammad's personal example and
the rallying cry of the Nation of Islam as they lure African Americans
into
their ranks. Muhammad not only enslaved people and built Islam on money
"earned" selling people into bondage, he himself owned slaves. Boys were
personal servants and girls were for personal services.
A poem recited this day proclaims: Ishaq:517 "Khaybar was stormed by the
Apostle's squadron, fully armed, powerful, and strong. It brought certain
humiliation with Muslim men in its midst. We attacked and they met their
doom. Muhammad conquered the Jews in fighting that day as they opened
their
eyes to our dust." It's hardly sermon material.
But sadly, imams have been preaching the following message for far too
long:
Ishaq:518 "Masud was one of those who found martyrdom at Khaybar. Muhammad
said, 'He has with him now his two dark-eyed virgins. When a martyr is
slain, his two virgins pet him, wiping the dust from his face. They say,
"May Allah throw dust on the face of the man who did this to you, and slay
him who slew you!"'" It's the antithesis of Christ's: "Love your enemies."
In the next installment of Islamic scripture, a Muslim deceives the
Quraysh
to collect his belongings. What's interesting is that Muhammad gave him
permission to lie and disavow Islam for money. Ishaq:519 "Hajjaj said to
the
Apostle, 'I have money scattered among the Meccan merchants, so give me
permission to go and get it.' Having got Muhammad's permission, he said,
'I
must tell lies.' The Apostle said, 'Tell them.'" Muhammad didn't heed
Yahweh's
command not to bear false witness. This prophet spit on the Ten
Commandments. As a result, the Islamic world cannot build a productive
economy or develop a stable democracy. The currency for both is trust. The
spirit of deceit still haunts Muslims.
The division of the "Spoils of Khaybar" was so im****tant to the formation
of
Islam that both Ishaq and Tabari dedicate entire sections to it. One line
in
particular reveals Muhammad's motivation for attacking the Jews. Tabari
VIII:128 "Khaybar was divided among the people who had been at
Hudaybiyah."
Each time Muhammad's mercenaries got down on him, he plundered Jews. This
was no exception. The prophet redeemed himself for having been disgraced
at
Hudaybiyah; he quieted his critics by sharing the booty from an easy kill.
Ishaq:521 "Khaybar was ap****tioned among the men of Hudaybiyah without
regard to whether they were present at Khaybar or not. The spoil was
divided
into 1,800 shares."
This Ishaq Hadith reveals where the booty went. Ishaq:521 "When the spoil
of
Khaybar was ap****tioned, the settlements of Shaqq and Nata were given to
the
Muslims while Katiba was divided into five sections: Allah's fifth [which
Muhammad was custodian]; the Prophet's fifth; the share to the kindred
[Muhammad's kin]; maintenance of the Prophet's wives [now there's an
honest
re****t]; and payment to the men who acted as intermediaries in the peace
negotiation with Fadak [which enabled the Profit to confiscate the entire
spoil]." Instead of a religious awakening, it was a repulsive accounting.
Ishaq:522 "Then the Apostle distributed the booty between his relatives,
his
wives, and to other men and women. He gave his daughter Fatima 200 shares,
Ali 100, Usama 250, Aisha 200, Bakr 100, Aqil ibn Abu Talib 140.. In the
name of Allah, Ar-Rahman, Ar-Rahim-this is a memorandum of what Muhammad
the
Apostle of Allah gave his wives from the dates and wheat of Khaybar: 180
loads." The Hadith lists additional special favors and bequeaths but I'll
spare you the gory details.
The first Islamic historian said, Tabari VIII:130 "The Prophet conquered
Khaybar by force after fighting. Khaybar was something that Allah gave as
booty to His Messenger. He took one-fifth of it and divided the remainder
among the Muslims. The inhabitants who surrendered did so on condition
that
they should be expelled." Tabari VIII:129 "After the Messenger had
finished
with the Khaybar Jews, Allah cast terror into the hearts of the Jews in
Fadak when they received news of what Allah had brought upon Khaybar. So
they sent to Muhammad to make peace with him for a half share of Fadak's
produce. Fadak became the exclusive property of Allah's Messenger." Peace
Islamic style means surrender. And surrender means giving Muhammad
everything.
Continuing to impugn its claim of tolerance, the Islamic scripture
reveals:
Tabari VIII:130 "The Messenger said during his final illness, 'Two
religions
cannot coexist in the Arabian Peninsula.' Umar investigated the matter,
then
sent to the Jews, saying: 'Allah has given permission for you to be
expelled; for I have received word that the Prophet said that two
religions
cannot coexist in Arabia." Ishaq:524 "We cannot accept the oaths of Jews.
Their infidelity is so great they swear falsely."
Bukhari also chronicled the dispensation of stolen property. Here is a
sampling: Bukhari:V5B59N525 "While we were besieging Khaybar a person
threw
a leather container containing some fat and I ran to take it. Suddenly I
looked behind, and behold! The Prophet was there. So I felt shy (to take
it
then)." Bukhari:V5B59N537 "On the day of Khaybar, Allah's Apostle divided
the war booty with the ratio of two shares for the horse and one-share for
the foot soldier." Bukhari:V5B59N541 "When we conquered Khaybar, we gained
neither gold nor silver as booty, but we gained cows, camels, goods and
gardens." Bukhari:V5B59N544 "Abu Huraira came to the Prophet and asked him
for a share from the Khaybar booty. 'O Allah's Apostle! Do not give it to
him. He is a strange guinea pig from Qadum Ad-Dan!' On that the Prophet
said, 'O sit down!' and did not give him a share." Bukhari:V5B59N547 "When
Khaybar was conquered, we said, 'Now we will eat our fill of dates!'"
There
are many more, but you get the picture. Islam was a "religion" only in the
sense that it became one man's license to steal from many.
Swimming in the blood and plunder of Khaybar didn't satisfy the sharks.
Instead, Muhammad's militants went off on a feeding frenzy. Tabari
VIII:131
"Allah's Apostle sent Umar with thirty men against the rear of Hawazin.
They
traveled by night and hid by day. However, word reached Hawazin and they
fled." Tabari VIII:132 "According to Waqidi, a thirty-man raiding party
led
by Bahir went to the Banu Murrah. His companions were killed and he was
carried away wounded with the dead. They returned to Medina." So. "The
Messenger sent Abdallah al-Kalbi to the land of the Murrah. During the
raid,
Usamah and one of the Ansar killed Mirdas. When they overcame him, Usamah
said, 'I testify that there is no god but Allah,' but we killed him
anyway."
Tabari VIII:133 "The raiding party led by Ghalib went to Abd Tha'labah.
One
of Muhammad's slaves, said, 'Prophet, I know where the Abd can be taken by
surprise.' So Muhammad sent him with Ghalib and 130 men. They raided Abd,
and drove off camels and sheep, bringing them back to Medina." Stealing
sheep does not make one a shepherd.
Then: Tabari VIII:133 "A raiding party led by Bahir went to Yumn. What
prompted this raiding party was that Hussayl had been the guide of
Muhammad
at Khaybar, and he came before the Prophet. He claimed that the Ghatafan
had
been summoned to march against him. The Muslims went out and captured
camels
and sheep. A slave belonging to Uyaynah met them, and they killed him.
Then
they encountered Uyaynah's army which retreated."
So Muhammad returned to Mecca. Tabari VIII:135/Ishaq:530 "When the Apostle
returned from Khaybar he sent out raiding parties and expeditions before
he
made the hajj. When the Meccans heard of it they got out of the Muslims'
way. Gathering at the door of the assembly house to look at them, they
said,
'Muhammad and his Companions are in poverty and misery; they are covetous
and miserly.'" From the very beginning the Meccans understood Muhammad and
Islam.
The warlord made a beeline for Allah's House. Ishaq:530 "The Prophet
stroked
and kissed the Black Stone. Then he went out trotting around the Ka'aba as
did his Companions. When the Temple concealed Muhammad from the Meccans
and
he had "istalama" (which means to embrace, stroke, and kiss) the southern
corner of the Ka'aba, he walked to "istalama" the Black Stone a second
time.
Then he "harwala" (which means to trot or prance swinging the shoulders
side
to side in a gloating manner) similarly for three circumambulations. He
walked the remainder of them. The Apostle only did this to show off in
front
of the Quraysh." It was so pagan and childish of him.
Muhammad not only kissed, fondled, and trotted around a Black Stone wedged
into the wall of a pagan rock shrine replete with 360 other idols, he
claimed this exhibition was Islamic "Sunnah." As such, the practice became
obligatory Islamic ritual with the binding power of law. Ishaq:531 "When
the
Prophet made his farewell pilgrimage he adhered to the practice making it
required Sunnah to be carried out forever." While Muhammad had not yet
stolen their town, he had usurped their idol and their religion.
A poem from that black day says: Ishaq:530 "Get out of his way you infidel
unbelievers. Every good thing goes with His Apostle. O Lord I believe in
his
word. We will fight you about its interpretations as we have fought you
about its revelation with strokes that will remove heads from shoulders.
And
we will make enemies of friends." The Meccans were being told to get out
of
Muhammad's way and yet it was their town, their god, their shrine, and
their
religious scam. Muhammad's example, as communicated through the Hadith, is
being called "good." That means terrorist raids, piracy, the slave trade,
torture, assassinations, mass murder, deception, bribery and rape are all
"good things" in Islam.
The line, "I believe in his word" can only be interpreted two ways, and
both
are bad. Either the Qur'an was comprised of Muhammad's words, as "his"
isn't
capitalized and follows a reference to the Apostle, or these Hadiths are
being acknowledged as "scripture"-words to be "believed."
The means Muslims said they would use to win the debate over Muhammad's
interpretation of Qusayy's scam and his claim to have received Allah's
revelations would be swords, not words. The religion was too foolish, and
the first Muslims were too ruthless, to impose the doctrine any other way.
Islam, properly deployed, severs heads and turns friends into enemies.
Tabari VIII:138 "According to Waqidi, Muhammad carried arms, helmets, and
spears. He led a hundred horses, appointing Bahir to be in charge of the
weapons and Maslamah to be in charge of the horses. When the Quraysh
received word of this, it frightened them. The Prophet said, 'Young or
old,
I have never been known but for keeping a promise. I do not want to bring
in
weapons against you, but the weapons will be close to me.'" So, which
story
is untrue? This Hadith says Muhammad never went back on a promise, but the
Qur'an says: 009.003 "And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to
the people on the day of the Great Pilgrimage is that Allah and His
Messenger dissolve treaty obligations with the Pagans." So who was lying,
prophet, god, or both?
When a sufficient number of Americans can answer the following question,
we
will be on the road to protecting ourselves from Islam: What kind of
religion causes people to think that terrorizing, mutilating, and
murdering
is a good thing to do?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related News Clips
16 dead in twin suicide attacks on Be'er Sheva buses
Sixteen people, including a 3-year-old boy, were killed and about 100
others
were wounded Tuesday afternoon in near-simultaneous suicide attacks on two
buses in the southern city of Be'er Sheva.
Hamas claimed the attacks, the first suicide bombings inside Israel in
five
months.
Seventeen people were still hospitalized by Tuesday night, eight of them
in
serious-to-critical condition. All of the wounded were taken to Soroka
Medical Center in Be'er Sheva.
The names of six fatalities have been released so far: Karin Malcha, 23,
Emanuel Yosef, 28, Shoshana Amos, 50, Tamara Badar****vili, 70, Aviel
Atash,
3 and Denise Hadad, 40.
In response to the attack, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Defense
Minister
Shaul Mofaz decided in a Tuesday night meeting with top security
officials,
security officials will launch a military offensive in the West Bank city
of
Hebron, the home of Be'er Sheva suicide bombers Ahmed Kawasma and Nassim
Jabri.
Hebron will be surrounded and Palestinians' freedom of movement there will
likely be severely limited. Shortly after the attack, Israel Defense
Forces
troops in the West Bank raided the bombers' homes.
Security forces will also bolster security along the seam line between the
southern Hebron Hills and the Negev, the area which the suicide bombers
apparently passed on their way to carrying out the attack.
In addition, security forces have imposed a full closure on the Gaza Strip
in the wake of Monday's attempted suicide bombing at the Erez Crossing.
Palestinian workers have also been banned from working in Israel or in the
Erez industrial zone until further notice. Assassinations of senior Hamas
leaders in the Gaza Strip are also expected to increase.
The initial investigation of the Be'er Sheva attack showed that both buses
departed from the central bus station in the city, and two suicide bombers
-
one on each bus - blew themselves up at 2:50 P.M., about 100 meters apart.
"I heard a blast and I started to run to the site. Within seconds there
was
another explosion," said Gil Yehezekel, the owner of a business close to
the
location of the attack.
"When I got there, there were people on the floor, wounded people, limbs
torn off," he said. "The police and ambulances arrived in seconds."
The driver of the second bus that blew up, Yaakov Cohen, said that when he
saw the bus ahead of his explode in a ball of flame he had a premonition
his
own vehicle would soon be next.
"I saw the first explosion and thought, my God, I've got to get out of
here.
I drove [my bus] about 10 meters and then opened the doors," he said from
his hospital bed, where he was being treated for leg wounds.
"I believe that between 10 to 15 people got off my bus. Suddenly I heard a
huge explosion. I can't explain it but it was almost as if I knew it was
going to happen. It was terrible, terrible ... I don't want to describe
what
I saw."
Cohen said there had been 20 to 30 people still waiting to leave his
vehicle
when the bomb went off, and that none of the passengers who boarded his
bus
earlier had looked suspicious.
"Believe me, I look and check," Cohen said. "It is very hard to identify a
bomber ... I don't know how anyone can."
Sharon vowed in the wake of the attacks that "the fight against terror
will
continue with full strength." Sharon will continue with the disengagement
plan, his aides said.
The Palestinian Authority condemned "any attacks that target civilians,
whether Israelis or Palestinian," Palestinian Minister Saeb Erekat said.
The
United States and European Union also condemned the attack.
In the Gaza Strip, Muslim leaders praised the "heroic operation" over
mosque
loudspeakers.
About 20,000 Hamas sup****ters sang and threw candy in the streets of Gaza
City in celebration of the bombings and their casualties.
Hamas claimed responsibility through a leaflet that surfaced in Hebron, 50
km from Be'er Sheva, saying the attacks were meant to avenge Israel's
assassination of its two top leaders in helicopter missile strikes in
March
and April.
"This is but one of a series of responses in which the Iz a Din al-Kassam
Brigades have vowed to carry out in response to the martyrdom of the
leaders
of our movement, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin and Abdel Aziz Rantisi," it said.
"Revenge is so sweet," said one celebrator, hoisting high a poster of
Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi.
The IDF believes that the military wing of Hamas in Hebron is behind the
attack.
Hamas sup****ters said they were pleased the group's repeated attempts to
launch attacks against the Jewish state had finally caused Israeli
casualties.
"Our religion orders us to respond in kind to aggression against us. You
[Israeli people] are the ones who choose your leaders and choose to be
their
****elds. Therefore your ****elds will suffer more blows," the leaflet said.
"This is a gift to the newcomers who arrived recently to our land," it
added
in a reference to recent wave of Jewish immigration to Israel. "We say to
you: 'This is your fate, so wait.'"
Following the blasts, the police bolstered the number of officers across
the
country. There had apparently been no alert that an attack was imminent.
Palestinian militants haven't carried out a suicide bombing inside Israel
since March 14, when 11 people were killed in the ****t city of Ashdod.
Earlier Tuesday, Israel Defense Forces soldiers caught a Palestinian man
carrying an explosives belt as he tried to cross into Israel from the Gaza
Strip.
[Emphasis added]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suicide Blast in Moscow Subway
THE death toll from a suicide blast outside a Moscow subway station rose
to
11 today, after two people died from their wounds in hospital, the
ITAR-TASS
news agency re****ted.
Late on Tuesday a female suicide bomber blew herself up outside a busy
Moscow underground station, in an attack claimed by a group that said it
downed two planes in Russia last week.
Nine people were killed immediately and 51 injured in the blast, which
caused scenes of carnage in the late evening rush on Tuesday, authorities
said earlier today.
Two men died from their wounds later today in a Moscow hospital, while 38
people, including two children, are still hospitalised in various
facilities
in the Russian capital ITAR-TASS said.
The prosecutor's office had earlier announced that the body of five
victims
had so far been identified.
Officials had been quick to say the metro attack was carried out by a
female
suicide bomber who was originally headed inside the subway but turned
around
after she saw police checking documents, eventually blowing herself up
outside.
The blast was claimed by the same group that said it was responsible for
the
downing of two passenger jets on August 25 that had left all 90 people on
board dead.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russian Air Disaster Was Suicide Attack, According to U.S. Sources
ABCNEWS.com
Aug. 27, 2004- Suicide bombers destroyed two Russian domestic airliners
Tuesday in precision attacks that killed 90 people, U.S. sources told ABC
News.
Traces of explosives found in one of two downed Tupolev planes match
explosives used in the 1999 bombing attacks of Moscow apartments by
Chechen
separatists, according to Russian officials.
"The results of the investigation have found hexogen," said Nikolai
Zakharov, a spokesman for the Federal Security Service, known as the FSB.
Hexogen, a highly sophisticated explosive also known as RDX and cyclonite,
is a clear, easily concealed, military explosive with very limited
commercial use. Less than a pound can bring down a plane.
In what Russian sources are calling "Russia's 9/11," Sibir Airlines'
Tu-154
and Tu-134 jets went down within 20 minutes of each other after taking off
from the same Moscow air****t Tuesday night.
Unidentified Chechen Women on Board
Russian officials suspect two female passengers of being the bombers. They
seem to have been Chechen and are the only bodies not claimed by relatives
or friends.
The ITAR-TASS news agency re****ted today that, according to air traffic
controller sources, the Tu-154 signaled three times that it had been
hijacked before it crashed.
According to the prestigious Kommersant newspaper, there were also
irregularities about how the women got tickets on the doomed flights.
Sibir officials told the Kommersant the woman on the Tu-154 had originally
bought a ticket for a flight the following day. But at the last minute, as
the jet was boarding, she asked to change her ticket for a seat on the
earlier flight, the newspaper re****ted.
She paid an extra 500 rubles ($16) to change her flight, the officials
said.
'Black Widows' Take on Major Operations
Airline officials also said they could find no record of her providing a
pass****t or other identification when she bought her ticket, according to
the newspaper.
Both women were also given seats near the rear of the jets, where the
explosions on each are believed to have occurred.
Based on the latest Russian re****ts, this is the presumed sequence of
events:
9:45 pm: Tu-154 takes off. Woman suspect No. 1 was on board, bound for the
Black Sea resort of Sochi.
10:31 pm: Tu-134 leaves for Volgograd, with woman suspect No. 2.
10:56: Tu-134 disappears from radar and crashes.
10:59: Tu-154 crashes, 500 miles away, after sending three hijack alarms
heard by an air traffic controller.
Chechen female bombers - known as "black widows" in Russia - have recently
begun participating in major militant operations in Russia.
The "black widows" first shot into the limelight during the deadly October
2002 Moscow theater siege and have been responsible for several attacks
since, according to Russian officials.
Tuesday's aviation disaster came days ahead of crucial Chechen
presidential
elections set for this weekend, and Russian security forces have been on
alert for terrorist attacks.
Web 'Statement' Claims Responsibility
The new findings follow a pur****ted Web statement by an Islamist group
taking responsibility for Tuesday's "operation."
In the statement, a group called the Islambouli Brigades said it had five
mujahedeen, or holy fighters, on board each aircraft. It warned this act
would be followed by others "until the killings of our Muslim brothers in
Chechnya cease."
p class=story>Russian security officials have refused to confirm or
comment
on the statement.
But a U.S. intelligence official said it's unclear if such a group even
exists and warned that such statements on the Web should be taken "with a
grain of salt."
Although it is not known if the Islambouli Brigades has any link to al
Qaeda, a group calling itself the Islambouli Brigades of al Qaeda claimed
responsibility for an attempt to assassinate a senior Pakistani official
last month.
Lt. Khaled Islambouli was the leader of the group of soldiers who
assassinated Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in Cairo in 1981.
[Emphasis added]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Militant Group Claims Downing of Russian Planes
CAIRO - A claim of responsibility for the downing of two Russian planes
appeared on a website known for militant Muslim comment on Friday.
The statement, which accused Russians of killing Muslims in Chechnya, was
signed 'The Islambouli Brigades'. A group with a similar name has claimed
at
least one previous attack, but the legitimacy of the group and the
authenticity of such statements could not be verified.
Russian officials have said terrorism was the most likely cause of
Tuesday's
plane crashes, which killed a total of 89 people.
'We in the Islambouli Brigades announce that our holy warriors managed to
hijack two Russian planes and were crowned with success though they faced
problems at the beginning', the statement said without elaborating on the
problems.
A July 31 web statement signed the 'Islambouli Brigades of Al-Qaeda'
claimed
responsibility for the attempt to assassinate Mr Shaukat Aziz, Pakistan's
Prime Minister-designate. Friday's claim did not refer to Al-Qaeda, the
international terror network led by Osama bin Laden.
Lieutenant Khaled Islambouli was the leader of the group of soldiers who
assassinated Egyptian President Anwar Sadat during a military parade in
Cairo in 1981.
Friday's statement said five mujahideen were on board each plane and their
wills will be published soon.
The statement did not explain how the hijackers boarded the planes, how
they
downed them or give any other details.
Russia's slaughtering of Muslims is continuing and will only stop when a
bloody war is launched,' the statement said. 'Our mujahideen, with God's
grace, succeeded in directing the first blow which will be followed by a
series of other operations in a wave to extend sup****t and victory to our
Muslim brothers in Chechnya and other Muslim areas which suffer from
Russian
faithlessness.'
[Emphasis added]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
52 Hours of Horror and Death for Captives at Russian School
BESLAN, Russia, Sept. 4 - Long before the first bombs exploded in Middle
School No. 1, marking the beginning of a ferocious battle that left
hundreds
of schoolchildren and their parents and teachers dead, the hostages had
descended to near despair.
"At first I thought it was a joke," said one survivor, Emma Gagiyeva, 13,
who sat numbly on a couch on Saturday, as the death toll climbed
relentlessly, to 330, with many children still missing. "Then they started
to shoot the windows, and glass fell on the people. They were shooting
above
our heads and they killed a few people, and I knew it was real."
She and other survivors and their families began to give a coherent
account
of the 52 hours of killings and captivity at the hands of masked gunmen
that
erupted in a catastrophic chain of events on Friday, when two large
explosions set off battles between the captors and Russian forces.
At least 1,200 people had been crammed into the school gymnasium, with no
food and little water, and with a frightening network of bombs laced
overhead.
Temperatures had become stifling, survivors and their families said
Saturday, and some students were so hungry they had taken to eating the
wilted bouquets they had carried to school. One boy said he was hoping for
a
bomb to go off, so the crisis might end. The terrorists teased their child
captives, and shot at least one man to demonstrate the penalty for
breaking
their rules.
Even as Beslan was consumed by agonizing worry and grief, interviews with
the survivors told of a moment when the first day of school became the
opening of an ordeal.
The day began with an assembly in the schoolyard, with children streaming
in
with parents and brothers and sisters to open the school year. It was like
years past, until the moment when the newly arriving first graders were to
be introduced. It had always been a tender moment in years past. This
year,
people heard shouts, and saw something alarming: a line of masked gunmen
advancing through the yard.
"The terrorists ran in yelling, 'Allahu Akhbar,'" said Asamaz Bekoyev, 11,
who escaped with his mother and brother and lay in his bed Saturday at his
grandmother's house, being treated for cuts and minor burns.
A brief gun battle ensued, as the terrorists overwhelmed the few police
officers at the ceremony, who had been caught unaware.
With shouts and threats, the entire school assembly was herded into the
gymnasium and told to sit down on the floor. The terrorists knew how to
force the group to submit. The captives would soon learn that being told
to
sit meant just that.
Asamaz's older brother, Azamat, 14, said one of the hostages, an Ossetian
man, tried to stand but as he rose to his feet a terrorist shot him in the
forehead. The man fell straight to the floor, dead. "I saw this with my
eyes," the boy said.
Another man tried to run out the back door to freedom, but a terrorist
followed him, calmly sighted him through the rifle and shot him in the
back.
The man's body was then dragged through the gymnasium by the feet, leaving
a
long trail of blood.
The cruel rules of the siege were now established: Obey or die.
Details followed: The hostages were allowed to speak only in Russian, so
the
captors could understand every word. They were told that they must remain
in
their places. They were told to hand in their cellphones.
"They said, 'If we hear somebody's telephone ringing, 20 people around you
will be killed,'" said Serafima Bekoyeva, 44, the mother of the two boys.
An order of business was soon under way. As hundreds of students huddled
together, the terrorists gathered about 10 of the adult male hostages and
enlisted them to help place bombs throughout the gym.
First they produced their make****ft bombs. Some were large plastic beer
bottles packed with explosives, others rectangular, bricklike packets,
wrapped tightly in brown tape, the survivors said.
The captors strung rope between the two basketball rims, and hung a line
of
these explosives overhead. The basketball nets themselves were tied shut,
forming mesh baskets, into which more bombs were placed. Other bombs were
arrayed along the floor and walls; the hostages estimated 20 in all,
strung
together with remarkable speed and skill.
The entire assembly was connected by blue and red wires, and at all times
one of the terrorists held a small black box with which the bombs could be
made to explode. "They told us that one press of a button was enough to
detonate everything," Ms. Bekoyeva said.
Another group of hostages, about 10 or 15 boys, were ordered into the
adjacent school building, where they served as a labor pool, stacking
desks
against doors and windows as a barricade for their captors' protection
from
Russian gunfire or advance.
Through the gymnasium drifted two female suicide bombers, wearing running
shoes and black clothes. Black scarves obscured their faces, leaving only
a
slit for their eyes. Each had an explosive belt. Each was armed the same
way: in one hand, a button for self-detonation, and in the other, a
pistol.
The terrifying waiting began. Sometimes, the hostages said, they were
taunted by both word and deed.
On the first day, they were given buckets of water and cups, but not
enough,
and people grew parched with thirst. The captors took clothes, soaked them
in water and threw them to the crowd, who clutched them and wrung them
above
their open mouths, drinking the drops.
Emma said she was caring for Regina So****oyeva, a 3-year-old girl who kept
crying out in thirst. "I held her and kept telling her, 'They will bring
some, they will bring some,' " Emma said.
But their cage grew hotter.
One woman asked for water, the hostages said, and a terrorist held a
pistol
to her head, which she pushed away in indignation. "I cannot even ask for
water?" she said. The terrorists then posted one of the women with a
suicide
bomb belt beside her.
"They said, 'If she says anything more, kill her,' " Azamat said. The
woman
sat quietly after that.
The rules became crueler still. Ms. Bekoyeva and her sons, and three other
survivors, said that after the terrorists grew irritated by the children's
continued crying, they pulled two men from the crowd, ordered them to hold
their hands behind their heads, and addressed the room.
"They said, 'If you don't stop this noise, we will kill them,' " Emma
said.
(One of the men was Batras Tuganov, Emma's uncle, who in the end was not
shot because of the noise level, but who has not been found after the
battle, and is feared dead.)
People did whatever they could to take care of themselves, shedding
clothes
to cool down, and tearing apart school textbooks to use as fans. "For two
days I was continually waving my arm to fan my children," Ms. Bekoyeva
said.
"They kept asking for more."
The terrorists also gradually restricted access to the bathroom, first
allowing five hostages at a time to use the toilets, then three. With
little
chance for their turn, the younger children could not hold back and
relieved
themselves in the crowd's midst. "We had them urinate into bundles of
cloth," Emma said.
The air grew steaming hot and foul-smelling with worry, urine and sweat.
Eventually the terrorists shot out the top windows, the survivors said, so
that a bit of air could move through the enclosed space.
The survivors also noted that their captors seemed to be students of past
failures: they carried gas masks, apparently having learned from the fate
of
the terrorists who seized a theater in Moscow in 2002, and succumbed to a
gas attack.
Sometimes the captors simply fired into the gym's ceiling.
Azamat recalled one terrorist, a man with a short beard whom the others
called Ali, saying, "Have you ever seen such kind terrorists?"
Azamat and Emma said that a woman offered the hostages all of the town's
money, but one of their captors said, "We don't need money. We have come
here to die."
As the interactions with their captors deepened, the hostages began to
develop a sense of who held their fates. They estimated the terrorists
number at 30. With the temperature rising, many of the gunmen removed
their
masks, displaying thick beards. They spoke Russian and a language the
Ossetians said they did not understand, but was probably Chechen.
The hostages said they were unable to tell whether Arabs were among their
captors, as the Russian government has asserted, without providing
evidence
as yet.
One hostage taker spoke of normal life, even as his own fate seemed
sealed.
"He said he himself had a wife and five children at home," Emma said.
The hostages heard through rumors shared quietly from captive to captive
that at least one of the women with the bomb belts detonated herself in
the
school library on Wednesday.
"After the first day, we did not see the women again," Ms. Bekoyeva said.
The terrorists also spoke of politics, saying that they wanted the release
of six Ingush who had been detained after an insurgent raid in June left
nearly 100 dead, and that they wanted to extend the war between Russia and
its breakaway republic of Chechnya.
They also showed strange signs of fastidiousness, considering their
evident
determination to die. Several terrorists, three hostages said, carried
toothbrushes, razors and toothpaste, tucked beside their ammunition on
their
camouflage-clad chests.
By late Friday morning, as the temperature soared anew in the crowded
gymnasium, the hostages were becoming weaker by the hour. "People were
almost losing consciousness," Azamat said. "We had not eaten or had water
in
almost three days."
Another boy who survived, Atsomaz Ktsoyev, 14, said the hostages were so
hungry they ate the floral bouquets they had brought to school for the
first
day of class. "I never thought in my life I'd be eating flowers," he said.
He added, "It didn't help."
Then came the end, at shortly after 1 p.m. Five or so terrorists had
checked
on the explosives, the survivors said, and a few minutes later, the hall
shook from an unexpected blast.
The first bomb blew out the windows and filled the room with smoke and
falling bits of plaster. Some hostages near the broken frames began to
pour
through th |
