On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:07:34 -0700 (PDT), panamfloyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>On Apr 21, 9:19 pm, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:56:31 -0700 (PDT), panamfl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> >On Apr 21, 1:32 pm, jesucris...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(marques de sade) wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:02:01 +0900, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>> >snippy
>>
>> >> so why do you act like you engage atheists in debate from a
>> >> scientific perspective when all is settled religiously for you...
>>
>> >They never seem to understand how absurd it looks to someone who's not
>> >a member of their own religion.
>>
>> >God believers, it really is this simple:
>>
>> >I don't believe your gods exist.
>>
>> Are you willing to admit your faith in that, or are you ashamed
>> to as the vast majority of strong atheists appear to be?
>
>It would appear the thought experiment has failed. You speak of the
>existence of gods as if it is im****tant. Since there is no evidence
>for such creatures, it is not.
How do you think you could you tell if you yourself were evidence?
>> >Just try to use your imagination for
>> >a moment, and I'll attempt to explain to you how it sounds to us.
>>
>> I don't have to use my imagination because I do consider
>> the possibility that God does not exist, as well as the possibility
>> that he does.
>
>Which is an indicator of the deeper problem. You are still pondering
>about whether or not gods exist.
As yet I have no reason to put faith in either possibility.
|
