On Apr 21, 9:19=A0pm, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:56:31 -0700 (PDT), panamfl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >On Apr 21, 1:32=A0pm, jesucris...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(marques de sade) wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:02:01 +0900, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> >snippy
>
> >> so why do you act like you engage atheists in debate from a
> >> scientific perspective when all is settled religiously for you...
>
> >They never seem to understand how absurd it looks to someone who's not
> >a member of their own religion.
>
> >God believers, it really is this simple:
>
> >I don't believe your gods exist.
>
> =A0 =A0 Are you willing to admit your faith in that, or are you ashamed
> to as the vast majority of strong atheists appear to be?
It would appear the thought experiment has failed. You speak of the
existence of gods as if it is important. Since there is no evidence
for such creatures, it is not.
> >Just try to use your imagination for
> >a moment, and I'll attempt to explain to you how it sounds to us.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0I don't have to use my imagination because I do consider
> the possibility that God does not exist, as well as the possibility
> that he does.
Which is an indicator of the deeper problem. You are still pondering
about whether or not gods exist.
snip
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
|
