On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:02:01 +0900, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:21:45 GMT, jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(marques de
sade) wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:42:44 +0900, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:55:52 GMT, jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(marques de
sade) wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:57:34 +0900, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:12:17 GMT, jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(marques
de sade) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:35:48 +0900, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:37:41 GMT, jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(marques
de sade) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:07:46 +0900, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:06:48 GMT, jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(marques de sade) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:33:10 +0900, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>28 For I, the Lord God, delight in the chastity of women. And
whore-
>>>>>>>>>>>domes are an abomination before me; thus saith the Lord of
Hosts."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>he delights in the chastity of women... hmmm...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>probably like those men in the FLDS...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>i'm sure those little girls are nice and chaste and can actually
>>>>>>>>>>wear white and have it mean something...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What are you talking about?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>about how women are supposed to stay a virgin until they marry?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, you should be answering the question this time not
>>>>>>>asking me, since you brought whatever it is up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>i was trying to interpret the bible verse you quoted...
>>>>>
>>>>> It was from the Book of Mormon, showing that men were forbidden
>>>>>to have more than one wife in that book.
>>>>>
>>>>>>i'm
>>>>>>probably way off any way... as you were... go back to your debate
>>>>>>with nagasiva, so i can see him kick your ass some more...
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL. Post some examples of that if you can, so I know what you
>>>>>think you're trying to talk about.
>>>>
>>>>lol, let's just wait for the next chapter...
>>>
>>> It looks like that would be the first chapter.
>>
>>i vividly recall otherwise...
>
> Unlike yourself, if I'm wrong about something I want to know
>what it is. It doesn't matter why, but I do. On top of that, if you
>think I'm wrong about something it should be fun for you to
>point it out, so, GO:
let's look at a quote from nagasiva to you:
|``here you describe whta you have rejected as "childish".
|how you arrive at this assessment you don't make plain.
|so it seems that you are using some method to winnnow
|hypotheses ("likely", "possible", "childish") one from
|another, but you aren't yet clear how you're doing it.
|if you ever become aware of this, do let us know, thanks.
|it's difficult to coordinate with you otherwise, and
|your knowledge seems to be absent any sound mooring
|(i.e. it is baseless and founded on fallacy/bias).''
-----------------------end quote----------
octinomos comment: i can help Nagasiva out here. dh's methodology
is to read the Koran or the Book of Mormon (or other similar
Sacred Writings) and accept them as the "Word of God"TM himself...
no need to hypothesize when ''God'' is already speaking directly
to us in those books, in plain english for all to see...
right dh? that settles all questions as to whether god exists or
not... those books plainly tell us that he does... agreed?
so why do you act like you engage atheists in debate from a
scientific perspective when all is settled religiously for you...
octinomos
--
`We come now to the idea of the Gaeia Universe, where the whole of the
Universe would be a single living entity of which all mankind is barely an
organelle. But unlike the organisms of Earth, the elements of the Universe,
energy and matter, are not connected by the bloody and battering
interaction of consumption that we experience on Earth, but by the same
forces of physics and mechanics which govern the aforementioned
astronomical principles. The concept of pantheism proposes an additional
connection, one of an overarching divine presence. In this divinity, mind
and matter are one, and all things in the Universe are evenly connected''
--B.D. Abramson
|
