Re: Jasmine, you idiot!

"Reality Scan" <QQJones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:7b84c3ca-3497-4b43-bb9b-28da7a4d0165@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 11, 11:27 am, "Lotus_Bloom" <dwal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Reality Scan" <QQJo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:602fc123-4c26-4090-aab4-6fda445ef156@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

>> On May 11, 6:42 am, "Carrie" <starch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >> > so pardon me if i do not buy your standard bull**** line about
being
>> >> > "open
>> >> > and honest" when you use it to describe someone who is anything
but
>> >> > either.
>>
>> >>    How about "how you see it is how it is for you?"
>>
>> > Like Tom Fox told you Carrie, many posters see you as an obnoxious,
>> > lying gossip and **** stirrer. Pretty much "Jerry Springer does A
>> > Course in Miracles." That's just how they see it and just how it is
>> > for them. Deal with it.
>>
>> I'd say a few would be more accurate.  I don't.
>
> Yeah, until you do.  The Smirk alliance which always ends up in a
> cannibal feast.
>
Yeah, usually those that refuse to see correctly label it as alliances.