Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Buddhism II > Re: Goo goo for...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 81 of 394 Topic 10474 of 10858
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)

by =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ==?= <chanfu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 16, 2008 at 10:08 PM

Keynes wrote:

> Is the world responsible for your own mind?

I don't have an "idea of the world" as you and
Tang seem to have. Mind is what my brain does.
Do you keep yours in your pocket? In a little
"mind wallet", next to the "world", all in neat
little compartments that don't include you?

Do you pull it out and let it run around on
the bar during Happy Hour?




 394 Posts in Topic:
A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-13 06:32:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-13 07:05:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 07:04:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 08:10:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 the_sunnyside_group@[EMAI  2008-05-13 13:51:20 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 18:02:34 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 20:36:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 20:03:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 12:19:45 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Wilson" <Wi  2008-05-14 20:52:16 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:41:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 10:00:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 23:16:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 02:07:25 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-16 18:24:48 
Re: The cover (was Re: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:51:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:26:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 00:25:43 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-15 07:44:03 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-15 07:42:30 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 the_sunnyside_group@[EMAI  2008-05-13 13:59:51 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-13 19:03:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 20:28:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 19:51:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 00:59:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 21:26:01 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-13 21:38:11 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 19:53:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 22:23:06 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 20:32:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 22:49:57 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 21:15:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-14 00:06:49 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Noel Friesen"   2008-05-14 22:53:41 
A Christian faith (was Re: A larger presence, the unknowable tot
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 07:30:21 
Re: A Christian faith (was Re: A larger presence, the unknowable
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-14 05:32:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 01:46:01 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:55:30 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 12:24:42 
bad gonad fi****ng dayz [ waz Re: A larger presence, the unknowab
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-14 12:54:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 17:57:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 12:25:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Benjamin <eggplantonto  2008-05-14 14:02:18 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 13:30:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-14 13:58:31 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Wilson" <Wi  2008-05-14 20:57:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Allen L. Barker&quo  2008-05-15 03:41:55 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 23:20:33 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 19:05:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 02:30:36 
Getting framed versus rising above the frame (was Re: A larger p
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 19:07:23 
Re: Getting framed versus rising above the frame (was Re: A larg
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-14 21:40:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:51:55 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 01:51:20 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 09:08:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-13 19:15:59 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 17:26:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 20:25:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 18:10:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 20:45:11 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 19:23:21 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-15 03:39:59 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 21:58:05 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-15 08:37:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-15 09:16:18 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-15 10:01:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-15 10:16:10 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Thread Terminating   2008-05-15 15:29:04 
Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-15 17:58:07 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 20:59:42 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 08:12:48 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-16 08:49:17 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 10:24:14 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Uncle Weasel <xin@[EMA  2008-05-17 12:36:11 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 09:50:35 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 13:38:48 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 13:50:51 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-16 20:55:06 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-16 21:17:47 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:01:41 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-16 22:08:49 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:14:37 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-16 22:23:47 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:52:25 
The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 08:28:20 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 08:02:08 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 10:30:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 09:48:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:24:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 10:56:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 06:40:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 08:52:18 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 12:32:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 13:14:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 15:22:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 14:45:19 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 16:05:10 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 17:32:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 17:17:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 17:29:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 19:41:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 18:57:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 20:55:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 16:38:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 18:45:13 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 20:54:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 19:07:08 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 21:58:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 21:08:16 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 23:02:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 22:12:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 23:39:33 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 00:43:58 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 23:57:07 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 01:00:19 
more than a feeling [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 00:17:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-21 20:07:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 22:19:10 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 22:32:06 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 07:23:34 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-21 04:22:52 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 08:57:30 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 "Noel Friesen"   2008-05-21 19:07:19 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 16:30:52 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 "Noel Friesen"   2008-05-22 01:18:42 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-21 21:37:38 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 21:31:24 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 "Noel Friesen"   2008-05-22 08:15:40 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 08:35:12 
Re: Brain drain training (was Re: The direct route)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 10:19:40 
Re: Brain drain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-21 16:01:14 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
 Renli <oliver.richman@  2008-05-23 01:15:21 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 04:30:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 04:37:24 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 04:45:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 05:53:49 
Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 09:28:11 
Re: Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:14:32 
Re: Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 22:12:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 06:31:16 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 14:29:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:42:09 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
 "Noel Friesen"   2008-05-18 04:23:52 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:19:00 
bread crumby [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for ch
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 02:28:23 
The cover (was Re: Goo goo for cheap)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 07:49:44 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 10:27:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 13:17:43 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 13:10:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 18:35:05 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 18:21:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-18 19:39:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 19:47:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-18 21:31:21 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 21:49:58 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Julian" <Ju  2008-05-20 09:44:41 
Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wrong (w
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-22 16:55:41 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 19:06:19 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 19:08:11 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
 =?windows-1252?Q?D=E9j=E0  2008-05-22 20:19:38 
Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:42:16 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 16:53:32 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:57:42 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 18:13:12 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 18:26:58 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 21:30:11 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 23:02:39 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 09:07:46 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-19 10:36:27 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 13:51:34 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 21:38:46 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:47:31 
Matter experiences matter (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-19 07:23:07 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:40:12 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 06:43:16 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 07:53:41 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-22 23:57:07 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 02:41:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-21 04:01:45 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-17 11:29:18 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 16:50:14 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 14:19:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 05:34:12 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 08:43:23 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 06:35:06 
breathing lesson [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo fo
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:22:31 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:27:25 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 11:39:21 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:49:59 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:07:25 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:10:42 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:15:51 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:27:58 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:32:11 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:59:21 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:47:02 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 11:53:27 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:48:26 
Crime against nature (was Re: The direct routez)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:53:21 
Re: Crime against nature (was Re: The direct routez)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 18:02:29 
Moo-goo gai-pan online (was Re: Crime against nature)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 18:27:59 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 21:25:39 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 09:54:35 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-20 04:28:11 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 08:19:14 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-21 07:06:58 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 heron stone <heronDO@[  2008-05-18 18:57:21 
The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 09:53:35 
Nothing to do with Buddhism (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 10:41:47 
Re: Nothing to do with narcissistic Buddhism (was Re: The direct
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:46:09 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 07:45:37 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:41:02 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:14:16 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:16:31 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:18:34 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:35:16 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 15:44:20 
Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:02:17 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 17:26:09 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:33:55 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-21 02:29:24 
Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 21:54:00 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:11:00 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 22:32:02 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:48:16 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 23:01:05 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:21:18 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-22 06:34:36 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 22:05:57 
Re: Fire and brimstonerz (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 00:54:47 
Category error (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:03:30 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 06:00:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 08:50:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:55:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:26:05 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:45:35 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 12:29:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 10:53:29 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-05-17 13:22:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:03:29 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 13:52:07 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 16:06:57 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 04:23:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 14:07:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 16:20:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:29:35 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-18 09:45:48 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:52:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 04:53:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 07:58:34 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:49:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-18 17:04:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-18 22:50:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Noel Friesen"   2008-05-21 18:04:01 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-21 20:56:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:48:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-18 23:48:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-19 13:24:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-20 13:58:09 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 16:39:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 19:48:33 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 20:43:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:15:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:05:32 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 00:45:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 06:11:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 05:55:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-20 09:37:13 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 12:47:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 12:08:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 13:46:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 13:38:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 14:59:59 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 14:46:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 17:17:45 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 21:03:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:16:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 20:29:30 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 21:41:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 22:08:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 22:31:30 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 01:08:30 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 00:48:55 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 10:48:44 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 10:14:36 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 11:39:43 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-21 15:55:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 "Dork of Delusion&qu  2008-05-20 18:12:14 
The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:30:46 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 19:48:26 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 22:43:16 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-20 22:59:39 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:28:59 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-05-21 21:43:47 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 "Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 07:08:09 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-22 09:10:55 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 "Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 10:12:11 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:57:27 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 "Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 12:26:37 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-23 04:03:38 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-23 04:04:28 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-23 07:17:44 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-23 05:39:55 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 "Noel Friesen"   2008-05-23 12:25:26 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-24 03:50:24 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-24 03:45:12 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 03:38:58 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 17:52:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:18:43 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 18:18:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-21 21:33:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:31:04 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:41:40 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 19:27:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-14 20:17:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:14:39 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 00:19:35 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:31:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 09:11:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 14:17:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 18:17:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:47:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 19:32:16 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:29:52 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 12:41:34 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-14 21:35:50 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:47:57 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-15 22:59:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 19:03:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:43:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 norbu.tragri@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-15 04:29:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 07:10:31 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 07:13:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 14:20:39 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:17:41 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:38:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 18:52:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 19:20:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 19:53:58 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:16:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 14:52:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:18:44 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 15:30:49 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 15:40:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 18:56:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 16:44:43 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 16:52:54 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 20:15:45 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 17:02:49 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 20:18:40 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 17:06:56 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 17:26:21 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?windows-1252?Q?D=E9j=E0  2008-05-15 21:50:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 22:02:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 22:05:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 22:13:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 22:20:26 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 22:21:33 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 17:29:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 20:41:09 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-15 19:24:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 22:47:12