Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is

On May 16, 10:59 am, DharmaTroll <dharmatr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:


SUCKER!!!!!!!

You fell for the Randi 1,000,000 prize
bull****!!!  YOU IDIOT, that's
not real, it's a publicity stunt,
NOBODY is EVER going to collect
any money from Randi, ever, for anything.
He's not even a scientist.

On the next item, the BBC program, I will
excuse you because, at first, I fell for it
too... until I searched out some links
and found out what really happened.

Here's what really happened.

A British pharmacology researcher named Ennis heard
about the Benveniste experiments and
thought his results absurd.  She also
did not agree with Homeopathy.
She figured a careful repeat
of his experiments would refute
the whole thing.  This experiment
involves the stimulation of basophil
cells with one of the highly
diluted substances similar to those
used in Homeopathy.  There were
NO atoms of the original substance
in her high dilution test substance.
She did the experiment and the basophil
cells responded as though
the missing substance was present,
even though it could not be cuz
it was diluted away.
She repeated the experiment and
got positive results.  Eventually,
she asked 4 independent European labs
to repeat her tests.  They did and
3 of them got positive results,
the fourth just failed.

Now comes the tricky part.

At about this time, a major
attack on Homeopathy was underway
by Maddox of Lancet (the guy
who forced Benveniste to
have the "amazing" "Randi"
present in order for Benveniste's
research to be published)
and by other disgruntled
scientists in Europe and England
jealous that research money
was going to Homeopathy.

With all this controversy
along comes the BBC and decides
to do an "expose'" of Homeopathy.

Without consulting ANY Homeopathists
or other researcher, they PRETENDED
to repeat the Ennis experiment -
what they really did was to change
the test protocol in a way
that GUARANTEED FAILURE.  Nobody
would ever get any positive
results EVER with this change.

Here is the definitive admission
from the BBC people themselves
that what they did was NOT Ennis'
experiment ->

->from Dana Ullman MPH web site at:
http://www.homeopathic.com/articles/view,59

"WAYNE TURNBULL(of BBC):

"The degranulation protocol that we use was never ****trayed as a
replication of Dr Ennis's methodology."

"If this experiment was not a replication of Dr. Ennis' trial, then
whose trial was it? Who agreed to this trial that he conducted? No
one!"

The BBC fake "refutation" was shown worldwide
and immediately the anti-Homeopathists
jump up and down with this BULL****
that it was disproved.

Meanwhile, with no publicity, the 3 out of
4 international labs that got POSITIVE results
were forgotten.

Don't believe me, search out the links,
read up on the experiment and learn for yourself.

But please, even if you are absolutely convinced
that Homeopathy does not work,
please DON'T BE SO DAMN GULLIBLE to believe
stuff you see in "videos" or hear about
or read.  Engage that noggin you have
and learn to think FOR YOURSELF.

Good luck, I've wasted enough time with ya,

Citizen Jimserac