Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Buddhism II > Re: A larger pr...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 377 of 394 Topic 10474 of 11014
Post > Topic >>

Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is

by "Evelyn Ruut" <evelyn.ruut@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM

"DharmaTroll" <dharmatroll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:abfa99cb-3ab5-455f-8fe6-4af4b9bee72c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 15, 6:40 pm, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On May 15, 5:52 pm, RaaN <raan2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> If you check on that research link I posted,
>> you'll find double blind placebo controlled
>> tests giving positive results for Homeopathy
>> for certain conditions.  Nothing ambiguous
>
> Except it isn't so.  No study has ever been replicated that gave
> homeopathy statistically significant results.
>
> Again, the advantage is that those as clueless as Citizen Joker here
> won't hurt themselves by taking sugar pills with magical stories
> added; whereas if they start taking herbs, they can hurt themselves
> and easily poison themselves.
>
>> The problem in Homeopathy is that
>> nobody understands how it is working,
>> when it works.
>
> No, we understand completely 100%, how the power of the mind works
> when you give someone a sugar pill and a magic story.  Your line here
> is meant to cover up the magic water claims, that water is really
> magic and can remember, so that even though it's just water, it's
> magic water, which imparts its magic onto the sugar pills.  That's the
> best story homeopathy comes up with.  When that's debunked, you say
> "we don't know how it works" playing the black box card.  But there is
> no black box.  It's a placebo.  Indeed, every person I've ever known
> that has gone for homopathetic medicine has denied the placebo effect
> and doesn't really understand the power of the mind.  How our minds
> work and heal our selves when we have beliefs:  that's the mystery
> that nobody understands.  So get it straight here.
>
>> Homeopathy has been in use for 200 years
>> and has actually performed better in
>> past cholera
>> and influenza epidemics than the standard
>> treatments of the times.
>
> Again, when the alternatives were barbarous quackery, homopathetic
> medicine won by default, because harmless sugar pills and magic
> stories are harmless, whereas every other treatment killed the
> patient!  And the placebo effect has been going on for more than 200
> years -- homopathetic medicine simply raised it to a new height by
> introducing the sugar pill.
>
> Also, not a single positive result better than placebo has ever been
> statistically demonstrated in over 200 years.  That's pretty laughable
> that you turn around and call 200 years of absolute complete failure
> some kind of proof that it's really magic and heals people, when
> people are healing themselves, as with any other placebo.
>
>> The key to Homeopathy is
>> that you have to accept that the mechanism
>> by which it works is unknown,
>
> Replace "placebo" for "Homeopathy" in that sentence and you are
> correct.
>
> The key is you have to believe it works.  That's the big secret.
>
>> I suspect that with advanced modern test
>> equipment such as MRI's, continued research
>> will confirm Homeopathy's mechanism
>
> They already have.  They've confirmed with 99.99% certainty that it's
> placebo.  And they've demonstrated why the "dilutions" in homopathetic
> medicine are nonsensical.
>
> Even you can do the math.  (It's much easier than even the simplest of
> physics that I've been discussing recently.)
>
> Most homopathetic remedies today range from 6X to 30X.  A 30X dilution
> means that the original substance has been diluted
> 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times. Assuming that a cubic
> centimeter of water contains 15 drops, this number is greater than the
> number of drops of water that would fill a container more than 50
> times the size of the Earth.  D'oh!  Imagine placing a drop of red dye
> into such a container so that it disperses evenly. Homeopathy's "law
> of infinitesimals" is the equivalent of saying that any drop of water
> subsequently removed from that container will possess an essence of
> redness.  Robert L. Park, Ph.D., a prominent physicist who is
> executive director of The American Physical Society, has noted that
> since the least amount of a substance in a solution is one molecule, a
> 30C solution would have to have at least one molecule of the original
> substance dissolved in a minimum of
> 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
> ,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules of water. This would
> require a container more than 30 billion times the size of the Earth.
>
> Let me repeat:  This would require a container more than 30 billion
> times the size of the Earth.  The homopathetic quacks' response --
> "well the water is magic and remembers the essence in its spiritual
> memory".  Utter Bull****.  Is there anyone on this list besides
> Citizen Joker that needs any more of a demonstration of the absurdity
> and quackery of this sham?
>
> --DharmaTroll


Hi DT,

It is something that will never be resolved, I think.   I have friends who

are into homeopathy too, and there is no discussing it in scientific
terms. 
They swear it works.   As for me, I will go to the doctor first, and try 
alternatives later.

-- 
Best Regards,

Evelyn
 




 394 Posts in Topic:
A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-13 06:32:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-13 07:05:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 07:04:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 08:10:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
the_sunnyside_group@[EMAI  2008-05-13 13:51:20 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 18:02:34 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 20:36:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 20:03:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 12:19:45 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Wilson" <Wi  2008-05-14 20:52:16 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:41:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 10:00:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 23:16:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 02:07:25 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-16 18:24:48 
Re: The cover (was Re: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:51:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:26:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 00:25:43 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-15 07:44:03 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-15 07:42:30 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
the_sunnyside_group@[EMAI  2008-05-13 13:59:51 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-13 19:03:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 20:28:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 19:51:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 00:59:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 21:26:01 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-13 21:38:11 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 19:53:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 22:23:06 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 20:32:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 22:49:57 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 21:15:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-14 00:06:49 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-14 22:53:41 
A Christian faith (was Re: A larger presence, the unknowable tot
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 07:30:21 
Re: A Christian faith (was Re: A larger presence, the unknowable
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-14 05:32:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 01:46:01 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:55:30 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 12:24:42 
bad gonad fi****ng dayz [ waz Re: A larger presence, the unknowab
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-14 12:54:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 17:57:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 12:25:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Benjamin <eggplantonto  2008-05-14 14:02:18 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 13:30:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-14 13:58:31 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Wilson" <Wi  2008-05-14 20:57:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Allen L. Barker&quo  2008-05-15 03:41:55 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 23:20:33 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 19:05:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 02:30:36 
Getting framed versus rising above the frame (was Re: A larger p
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 19:07:23 
Re: Getting framed versus rising above the frame (was Re: A larg
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-14 21:40:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:51:55 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 01:51:20 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 09:08:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-13 19:15:59 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 17:26:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 20:25:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 18:10:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 20:45:11 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 19:23:21 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"possum" <ze  2008-05-15 03:39:59 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 21:58:05 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-15 08:37:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-15 09:16:18 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-15 10:01:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-15 10:16:10 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Thread Terminating   2008-05-15 15:29:04 
Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-15 17:58:07 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 20:59:42 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 08:12:48 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-16 08:49:17 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 10:24:14 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Uncle Weasel <xin@[EMA  2008-05-17 12:36:11 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 09:50:35 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 13:38:48 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 13:50:51 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-16 20:55:06 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-16 21:17:47 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:01:41 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-16 22:08:49 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:14:37 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-16 22:23:47 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:52:25 
The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 08:28:20 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 08:02:08 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 10:30:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 09:48:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:24:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 10:56:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 06:40:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 08:52:18 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 12:32:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 13:14:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 15:22:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 14:45:19 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 16:05:10 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 17:32:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 17:17:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 17:29:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 19:41:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 18:57:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 20:55:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 16:38:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 18:45:13 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 20:54:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 19:07:08 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 21:58:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 21:08:16 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 23:02:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 22:12:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 23:39:33 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 00:43:58 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 23:57:07 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 01:00:19 
more than a feeling [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 00:17:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-21 20:07:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 22:19:10 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 22:32:06 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 07:23:34 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-21 04:22:52 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 08:57:30 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-21 19:07:19 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 16:30:52 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-22 01:18:42 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-21 21:37:38 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 21:31:24 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-22 08:15:40 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 08:35:12 
Re: Brain drain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 10:19:40 
Re: Brain drain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-21 16:01:14 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
Renli <oliver.richman@  2008-05-23 01:15:21 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 04:30:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 04:37:24 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 04:45:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 05:53:49 
Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 09:28:11 
Re: Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:14:32 
Re: Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 22:12:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 06:31:16 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 14:29:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:42:09 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-18 04:23:52 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:19:00 
bread crumby [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for ch
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 02:28:23 
The cover (was Re: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 07:49:44 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 10:27:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 13:17:43 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 13:10:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 18:35:05 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 18:21:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-18 19:39:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 19:47:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-18 21:31:21 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 21:49:58 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Julian" <Ju  2008-05-20 09:44:41 
Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wrong (w
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-22 16:55:41 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 19:06:19 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 19:08:11 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
=?windows-1252?Q?D=E9j=E0  2008-05-22 20:19:38 
Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:42:16 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 16:53:32 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:57:42 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 18:13:12 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 18:26:58 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 21:30:11 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 23:02:39 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 09:07:46 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-19 10:36:27 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 13:51:34 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 21:38:46 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:47:31 
Matter experiences matter (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-19 07:23:07 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:40:12 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 06:43:16 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 07:53:41 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-22 23:57:07 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 02:41:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-21 04:01:45 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-17 11:29:18 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 16:50:14 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 14:19:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 05:34:12 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 08:43:23 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 06:35:06 
breathing lesson [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo fo
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:22:31 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:27:25 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 11:39:21 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:49:59 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:07:25 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:10:42 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:15:51 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:27:58 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:32:11 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:59:21 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:47:02 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 11:53:27 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:48:26 
Crime against nature (was Re: The direct routez)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:53:21 
Re: Crime against nature (was Re: The direct routez)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 18:02:29 
Moo-goo gai-pan online (was Re: Crime against nature)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 18:27:59 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 21:25:39 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 09:54:35 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-20 04:28:11 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 08:19:14 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-21 07:06:58 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
heron stone <heronDO@[  2008-05-18 18:57:21 
The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 09:53:35 
Nothing to do with Buddhism (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 10:41:47 
Re: Nothing to do with narcissistic Buddhism (was Re: The direct
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:46:09 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 07:45:37 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:41:02 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:14:16 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:16:31 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:18:34 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:35:16 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 15:44:20 
Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:02:17 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 17:26:09 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:33:55 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
"possum" <ze  2008-05-21 02:29:24 
Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 21:54:00 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
"possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:11:00 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 22:32:02 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
"possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:48:16 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 23:01:05 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:21:18 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-22 06:34:36 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 22:05:57 
Re: Fire and brimstonerz (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 00:54:47 
Category error (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:03:30 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 06:00:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 08:50:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:55:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:26:05 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:45:35 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 12:29:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 10:53:29 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-05-17 13:22:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:03:29 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 13:52:07 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 16:06:57 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 04:23:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 14:07:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 16:20:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:29:35 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-18 09:45:48 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:52:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 04:53:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 07:58:34 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:49:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-18 17:04:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-18 22:50:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-21 18:04:01 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-21 20:56:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:48:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-18 23:48:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-19 13:24:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-20 13:58:09 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 16:39:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 19:48:33 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 20:43:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:15:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:05:32 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 00:45:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 06:11:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 05:55:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-20 09:37:13 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 12:47:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 12:08:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 13:46:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 13:38:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 14:59:59 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 14:46:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 17:17:45 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 21:03:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:16:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 20:29:30 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 21:41:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 22:08:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 22:31:30 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 01:08:30 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 00:48:55 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 10:48:44 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 10:14:36 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 11:39:43 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-21 15:55:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Dork of Delusion&qu  2008-05-20 18:12:14 
The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:30:46 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 19:48:26 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 22:43:16 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-20 22:59:39 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:28:59 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-05-21 21:43:47 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 07:08:09 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-22 09:10:55 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 10:12:11 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:57:27 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 12:26:37 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-23 04:03:38 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-23 04:04:28 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-23 07:17:44 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-23 05:39:55 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-23 12:25:26 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-24 03:50:24 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-24 03:45:12 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 03:38:58 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 17:52:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:18:43 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 18:18:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-21 21:33:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:31:04 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:41:40 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 19:27:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-14 20:17:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:14:39 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 00:19:35 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:31:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 09:11:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 14:17:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 18:17:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:47:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 19:32:16 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:29:52 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 12:41:34 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-14 21:35:50 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:47:57 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-15 22:59:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 19:03:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:43:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
norbu.tragri@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-15 04:29:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 07:10:31 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 07:13:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 14:20:39 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:17:41 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:38:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 18:52:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 19:20:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 19:53:58 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:16:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 14:52:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:18:44 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 15:30:49 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 15:40:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 18:56:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 16:44:43 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 16:52:54