Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Buddhism II > Re: A larger pr...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 47 of 394 Topic 10474 of 11272
Post > Topic >>

Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is

by "Allen L. Barker" <alb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2008 at 03:41 AM

Ned wrote:
> 
>  Ask William if he recited the mani mantra 10,000 times.
> 

There is
    Nam myoho renge kyo
for the Nichirens.  More strictly it is Namu, but
the last syllable tends to be suppressed.  The "a"
in Nam is more like in "say ahhh" rather than in the
slang for Vietnam.  Some mp3s on the web provide
examples.

Unfortunately, this chant has so many connotations
these days (well after the days of Nichiren himself).
Chant this for cars, chant this for good-looks, chant
this to win the lotto, chant this to sup****t a party
of the Japanese government.  Really, of course, the
chant is the name of the Lotus Sutra in Japanese.

There is
    Om mani padme hum
with the "hum" possibly pronounced as in "things that
make you go..."  This is a well-known chant.  It
tends to be associated these days with Tibetan
Buddhism.

As an activist for human rights -- regardless
of what government or group is suppressing those
rights -- I certainly sympathize with the Tibetan
people.  But, as a meditative chant to transcend
all categories, for some people this chant can tend
to reinforce the categories.  Not for all people, of
course, but for some.

So, what is a good "whatever you meet, whether
facing inward or outward, just kill it" Rinzai sort
of person supposed to chant, when he or she decides
to employ the time-tested practice of chanting
(empirically, at least, to observe what it might be
useful for)?

The above two chants are OK, of course.  Try them.

There are also various Japanese-language chants of
whole sutras, but really, who has time to learn all
that?

There is the "supreme mantra" from the Heart Sutra:
    Gate, gate, paragate, parasamgate, bodhi svaha
But really, in practice, it doesn't seem to be
optimized for 10,000 repetitions (like a crazy Nichiren
would do with Nam myoho renge kyo).  At least that's
how it seems to me.

So, for the Zen-types who want a chant to consider, I
present the following.

For a while I tried the chant of "zero, zero, zero, ..."
and had some success with it (in some very harsh
conditions).  It is a good chant, signifying nothing. ;-)
But it still does not have quite the right musical-feel
and cadence to it.  This gives the advantage to the
crazy Nichiren-types, which Zen-devils certainly cannot
allow!

Without further ado, the suggested chant for the Zen
types is:
    Mu, only just don't know

As usual, the "u" in "Mu" is pronounced as in the word
"put."  Put the infinitum in "ad infinitum," rather
than the nauseum in "ad nauseum"!  Repeat 10,000 times,
plus or minus!

     Mu, only just don't know
     Mu, only just don't know
     Mu, only just don't know
     Mu, only just don't know
     Mu, only just don't know
     Mu, only just don't know
     etc.


Svaha!
 




 394 Posts in Topic:
A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-13 06:32:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-13 07:05:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 07:04:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-13 08:10:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
the_sunnyside_group@[EMAI  2008-05-13 13:51:20 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 18:02:34 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 20:36:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 20:03:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 12:19:45 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Wilson" <Wi  2008-05-14 20:52:16 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:41:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 10:00:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 23:16:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 02:07:25 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-16 18:24:48 
Re: The cover (was Re: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:51:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:26:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 00:25:43 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-15 07:44:03 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-15 07:42:30 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
the_sunnyside_group@[EMAI  2008-05-13 13:59:51 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-13 19:03:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 20:28:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 19:51:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 00:59:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-13 21:26:01 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-13 21:38:11 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 19:53:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 22:23:06 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 20:32:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-13 22:49:57 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-13 21:15:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-14 00:06:49 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-14 22:53:41 
A Christian faith (was Re: A larger presence, the unknowable tot
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 07:30:21 
Re: A Christian faith (was Re: A larger presence, the unknowable
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-14 05:32:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 01:46:01 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:55:30 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 12:24:42 
bad gonad fishing dayz [ waz Re: A larger presence, the unknowab
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-14 12:54:24 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 17:57:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-14 12:25:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Benjamin <eggplantonto  2008-05-14 14:02:18 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-14 13:30:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-14 13:58:31 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Wilson" <Wi  2008-05-14 20:57:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Allen L. Barker&quo  2008-05-15 03:41:55 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 23:20:33 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 19:05:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 02:30:36 
Getting framed versus rising above the frame (was Re: A larger p
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-14 19:07:23 
Re: Getting framed versus rising above the frame (was Re: A larg
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-14 21:40:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Richard Corfield <Rich  2008-05-14 06:51:55 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 01:51:20 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 09:08:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-13 19:15:59 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 17:26:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 20:25:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 18:10:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 20:45:11 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 19:23:21 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"possum" <ze  2008-05-15 03:39:59 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 21:58:05 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-15 08:37:27 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-15 09:16:18 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-15 10:01:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-15 10:16:10 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Thread Terminating   2008-05-15 15:29:04 
Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-15 17:58:07 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-15 20:59:42 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 08:12:48 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-16 08:49:17 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-16 10:24:14 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Uncle Weasel <xin@[EMA  2008-05-17 12:36:11 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 09:50:35 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 13:38:48 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 13:50:51 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-16 20:55:06 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-16 21:17:47 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:01:41 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-16 22:08:49 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:14:37 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-16 22:23:47 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 21:52:25 
The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 08:28:20 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 08:02:08 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 10:30:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 09:48:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:24:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-17 10:56:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 06:40:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 08:52:18 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 12:32:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 13:14:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 15:22:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 14:45:19 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 16:05:10 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 17:32:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 17:17:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 17:29:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 19:41:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 18:57:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 20:55:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 16:38:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 18:45:13 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 20:54:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-19 19:07:08 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 21:58:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 21:08:16 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-19 23:02:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 22:12:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 23:39:33 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 00:43:58 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-19 23:57:07 
Re: The direct doing route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 01:00:19 
more than a feeling [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 00:17:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-21 20:07:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 22:19:10 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 22:32:06 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 07:23:34 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-21 04:22:52 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 08:57:30 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-21 19:07:19 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 16:30:52 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-22 01:18:42 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-21 21:37:38 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 21:31:24 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-22 08:15:40 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 08:35:12 
Re: Brain drain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 10:19:40 
Re: Brain drain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-21 16:01:14 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
Renli <oliver.richman@  2008-05-23 01:15:21 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 04:30:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 04:37:24 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 04:45:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 05:53:49 
Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 09:28:11 
Re: Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:14:32 
Re: Total reversal (was Re: The direct route)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 22:12:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-18 06:31:16 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 14:29:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:42:09 
Re: Goo goo for cheap (was Re: A larger presence)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-18 04:23:52 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:19:00 
bread crumby [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for ch
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-20 02:28:23 
The cover (was Re: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 07:49:44 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 10:27:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 13:17:43 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 13:10:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 18:35:05 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 18:21:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-18 19:39:42 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 19:47:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-18 21:31:21 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 21:49:58 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Julian" <Ju  2008-05-20 09:44:41 
Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wrong (w
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-22 16:55:41 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 19:06:19 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 19:08:11 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
=?windows-1252?Q?D=E9j=E0  2008-05-22 20:19:38 
Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:42:16 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 16:53:32 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:57:42 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 18:13:12 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 18:26:58 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 21:30:11 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 23:02:39 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 09:07:46 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-19 10:36:27 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-19 13:51:34 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-18 21:38:46 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:47:31 
Matter experiences matter (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-19 07:23:07 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:40:12 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 06:43:16 
Re: Brain training (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 07:53:41 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-22 23:57:07 
Re: Scientists Know Better Than Keynes -- Even When They're Wron
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-23 02:41:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-21 04:01:45 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-17 11:29:18 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 16:50:14 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 14:19:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 05:34:12 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-17 08:43:23 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 06:35:06 
breathing lesson [ waz Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo fo
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:22:31 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:27:25 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 11:39:21 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:49:59 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:07:25 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:10:42 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:15:51 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:27:58 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 12:32:11 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:59:21 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:47:02 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 11:53:27 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 17:48:26 
Crime against nature (was Re: The direct routez)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:53:21 
Re: Crime against nature (was Re: The direct routez)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 18:02:29 
Moo-goo gai-pan online (was Re: Crime against nature)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 18:27:59 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-18 21:25:39 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-19 09:54:35 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-20 04:28:11 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 08:19:14 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-21 07:06:58 
Re: The direct routez (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
heron stone <heronDO@[  2008-05-18 18:57:21 
The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 09:53:35 
Nothing to do with Buddhism (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 10:41:47 
Re: Nothing to do with narcissistic Buddhism (was Re: The direct
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-18 10:46:09 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 07:45:37 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 10:41:02 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:14:16 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:16:31 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-18 17:18:34 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-19 23:35:16 
Re: The absolute truth, period (was Re: The direct route)
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 15:44:20 
Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:02:17 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 17:26:09 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:33:55 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
"possum" <ze  2008-05-21 02:29:24 
Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 21:54:00 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
"possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:11:00 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 22:32:02 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
"possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:48:16 
Re: Life by proxy (was Re: Fire and brimstone)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 23:01:05 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:21:18 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-22 06:34:36 
Re: Fire and brimstone (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 22:05:57 
Re: Fire and brimstonerz (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 00:54:47 
Category error (was Re: The absolute truth, period)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:03:30 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 06:00:38 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 08:50:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:55:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:26:05 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 09:45:35 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 12:29:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 10:53:29 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-05-17 13:22:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 11:03:29 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 13:52:07 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 16:06:57 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 04:23:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-17 14:07:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 16:20:40 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:29:35 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-18 09:45:48 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-17 20:52:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-18 04:53:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 07:58:34 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-18 11:49:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-18 17:04:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-18 22:50:27 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-21 18:04:01 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-21 20:56:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:48:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-18 23:48:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-19 13:24:00 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-20 13:58:09 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 16:39:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 19:48:33 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 20:43:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:15:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:05:32 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 00:45:02 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Evelyn" <ev  2008-05-20 06:11:03 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 05:55:55 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-20 09:37:13 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 12:47:17 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 12:08:51 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 13:46:28 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 13:38:26 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 14:59:59 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 14:46:37 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 17:17:45 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 21:03:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"possum" <ze  2008-05-21 03:16:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-20 20:29:30 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 21:41:15 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-20 22:08:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 22:31:30 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 01:08:30 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 00:48:55 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 10:48:44 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-21 10:14:36 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-21 11:39:43 
Re: The direct routerz (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-21 15:55:41 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
"Dork of Delusion&qu  2008-05-20 18:12:14 
The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-20 18:30:46 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-20 19:48:26 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 22:43:16 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-20 22:59:39 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:28:59 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-05-21 21:43:47 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 07:08:09 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Ali <lalala@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-22 09:10:55 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 10:12:11 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:57:27 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
"Ned" <nedlu  2008-05-22 12:26:37 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-23 04:03:38 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-23 04:04:28 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-23 07:17:44 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Hollywood Lee <hollywo  2008-05-23 05:39:55 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
"Noel Friesen"   2008-05-23 12:25:26 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-24 03:50:24 
Re: The flighty elite (was Re: The direct route)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-24 03:45:12 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 03:38:58 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 17:52:54 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-22 04:18:43 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-20 18:18:22 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-21 21:33:53 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:31:04 
Re: The direct route (was nRe: Goo goo for cheap)
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-22 10:41:40 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-14 19:27:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-14 20:17:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:14:39 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 00:19:35 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:31:15 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 09:11:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 14:17:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 18:17:25 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:47:37 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 19:32:16 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:29:52 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-16 12:41:34 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-14 21:35:50 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-14 21:47:57 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-15 22:59:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 19:03:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:43:19 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
norbu.tragri@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-15 04:29:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 07:10:31 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 07:13:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 14:20:39 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:17:41 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-16 04:38:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 18:52:04 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 19:20:46 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 19:53:58 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 20:16:28 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 14:52:00 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
"Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-15 18:18:44 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 15:30:49 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 15:40:48 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 18:56:38 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 16:44:43 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 16:52:54 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 20:15:45 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
Citizen Jimserac <Jims  2008-05-15 17:02:49 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 20:18:40 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 17:06:56 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
DharmaTroll <dharmatro  2008-05-15 17:26:21 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?windows-1252?Q?D=E9j=E0  2008-05-15 21:50:02 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-15 22:02:47 
Re: A larger presence, the unknowable total of all there is
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-15 22:05