On May 8, 6:43=A0pm, Ali <lal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 18:21:21 -0400, Tang Huyen
>
> <tanghuyen{dele...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---*=3D#" wrote:
>
> >> what qualifies you to judge someone
> >> else's knowledge of that which is
> >> prior to knowledge ?
>
> >If somebody claims knowledge of that which is
> >prior to knowledge, or some such, and then
> >blows up all over on account of mere words on
> >the screen, such claims are worth diddly squat,
> >and such a person only drools in public.
>
> >Tang Huyen
>
> Relax, have a cigar, listen to some chamber music. Eventually all of
> us drool or shit our pants in public. Or both. It's not such a big
> deal.
Nor indicative of a generalized state of advancement or not. We don't
advance on all fronts equally so our public face may not be indicative
of anything whatsoever.
|
