Ali wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 18:21:21 -0400, Tang Huyen
> <tanghuyen{delete}@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---*=#" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>what qualifies you to judge someone
>>>else's knowledge of that which is
>>>prior to knowledge ?
>>
>>If somebody claims knowledge of that which is
>>prior to knowledge, or some such, and then
>>blows up all over on account of mere words on
>>the screen, such claims are worth diddly squat,
>>and such a person only drools in public.
>>
>>Tang Huyen
>
>
> Relax, have a cigar, listen to some chamber music. Eventually all of
> us drool or **** our pants in public. Or both. It's not such a big
> deal.
Only drools in public? You'd think if they drooled in public, they'd
drool at home, too...
DT
|
