On 8 May, 15:21, Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{dele...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---*=#" wrote:
> > what qualifies you to judge someone
> > else's knowledge of that which is
> > prior to knowledge ?
>
> If somebody claims knowledge of that which is
> prior to knowledge, or some such, and then
> blows up all over on account of mere words on
> the screen, such claims are worth diddly squat,
> and such a person only drools in public.
>
> Tang Huyen
Let people be what they are.
