On Thu, 08 May 2008 18:21:21 -0400, Tang Huyen
<tanghuyen{delete}@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---*=#" wrote:
>
>> what qualifies you to judge someone
>> else's knowledge of that which is
>> prior to knowledge ?
>
>If somebody claims knowledge of that which is
>prior to knowledge, or some such, and then
>blows up all over on account of mere words on
>the screen, such claims are worth diddly squat,
>and such a person only drools in public.
>
>Tang Huyen
Relax, have a cigar, listen to some chamber music. Eventually all of
us drool or **** our pants in public. Or both. It's not such a big
deal.
|
