"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---*=#" wrote:
> what qualifies you to judge someone
> else's knowledge of that which is
> prior to knowledge ?
If somebody claims knowledge of that which is
prior to knowledge, or some such, and then
blows up all over on account of mere words on
the screen, such claims are worth diddly squat,
and such a person only drools in public.
Tang Huyen
