On Mon, 5 May 2008 16:54:41 -0700 (PDT), Awaken21
<lukecarlos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 5, 9:59 am, Ali <lal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 May 2008 17:01:12 -0700 (PDT), Awaken21
>>
>> <lukecar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >On May 3, 11:06 am, Renli <oliver.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> On May 3, 11:00 am, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Those are a lot of tests to pass! :)
>>
>> There's really only one.
>>
>> >> Especially considering that the long and short of it is, that it is
>> >> not possible to discern with 100% accuracy if someone is enlightened
>> >> or not if you are not enlightened yourself.
>>
>> >Even if you are it might not be possible.
>>
>> That's silly.
>>
>> >The master decides weather
>> >or not reveal himself, other masters know that much.
>>
>> I don't think so. The master is bound to appear by the readiness of
>> the seeker. Kind of like a court summons. The master does not turn his
>> light on or off, either. It's a constant...in my experience.
>
>Consider this from one...
>
>"Once again the mountains are just mountains, trees just trees. If
>birds were to spread flower petals at my feet I could not help but be
>embarrased."
That's cute, but inappropriate.
|
