On May 5, 9:59 pm, Ali <lal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 May 2008 17:01:12 -0700 (PDT), Awaken21
>
> <lukecar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On May 3, 11:06 am, Renli <oliver.rich...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On May 3, 11:00 am, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > Those are a lot of tests to pass! :)
>
> There's really only one.
>
> >> Especially considering that the long and short of it is, that it is
> >> not possible to discern with 100% accuracy if someone is enlightened
> >> or not if you are not enlightened yourself.
>
> >Even if you are it might not be possible.
>
> That's silly.
>
> >The master decides weather
> >or not reveal himself, other masters know that much.
>
> I don't think so. The master is bound to appear by the readiness of
> the seeker. Kind of like a court summons. The master does not turn his
> light on or off, either. It's a constant...in my experience.
Sure, but "bound" to appear? Can you elaborate on what binds him? Is
it really a binding of this sort?
-
|
