Religion > Buddhism II > Re: Cheap thril...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

by Robert Epstein <vze256xu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 5, 2008 at 02:03 AM

Raymond wrote:

> On Sun, 04 May 2008 07:26:13 -0400, Tang Huyen
> <tanghuyen{delete}@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>>Raymond wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Tang Huyen:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On the theory of the universal Buddha-nature,
>>>>awakening is basic and universal, therefore it
>>>>is not just a dime a dozen but flat-out free.
>>>
>>>No, it's never free. It's priceless.
>>
>>Why haggle about its price?
> 
> 
> Because people are cheap in this day and age.

What would you like them to do?
Is it just a question of being worthy,
or something necessary in order to understand what is being offered?

Robert

= = = = = = =

94 Posts in Topic:

Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-04-25 05:21:07

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{

2008-05-01 10:18:32

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-05 05:05:32

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 09:28:38

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Dave K <dkotschess@[EM

2008-05-01 10:41:13

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F

2008-05-01 19:07:32

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL

2008-05-01 19:23:57

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

=?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=

2008-05-01 20:25:51

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-01 17:43:25

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-03 07:01:28

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatednesss?

"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-03 10:31:23

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-04 01:02:26

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Dave K <dkotschess@[EM

2008-05-02 06:38:21

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-02 09:46:56

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{

2008-05-03 10:23:19

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL

2008-05-03 10:18:33

Re: Interiority? Or interalia-relatedness?

"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-03 11:32:18

Re: Interiority? Or interalia-relatedness?

Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL

2008-05-03 10:40:01

Re: Interiority? Or interalia-relatedness?

"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-03 12:57:58

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 09:40:49

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Bill Pfeifer <billpfei

2008-05-05 22:41:01

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-03 07:33:10

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP

2008-05-03 22:38:39

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-04 01:13:04

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-03 12:10:55

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-04 03:39:20

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-05 16:30:41

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 18:38:52

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 23:24:40

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-03 08:33:43

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL

2008-05-03 14:16:19

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-04 05:52:58

Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{

2008-05-04 06:56:23

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-04 07:02:07

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{

2008-05-04 07:26:13

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-04 07:51:29

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-05 02:03:51

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

fred kepler <fkepler@[

2008-05-04 14:05:21

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

jfezl07@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-06 19:30:04

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"possum" <ze

2008-05-07 03:34:38

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[

2008-05-06 19:31:36

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-07 03:51:19

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-07 06:40:42

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

jfezl07@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-06 19:52:52

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"possum" <ze

2008-05-07 04:10:46

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"possum" <ze

2008-05-07 04:12:05

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"possum" <ze

2008-05-07 04:16:35

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[

2008-05-06 20:56:41

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-07 04:31:59

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL

2008-05-03 14:24:52

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL

2008-05-04 08:05:07

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-04 14:12:48

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[

2008-05-04 18:18:00

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-05 02:26:24

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[

2008-05-04 18:27:03

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 05:06:51

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-04 18:45:18

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 06:06:12

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-05 04:04:07

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 07:36:44

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 18:25:03

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 23:37:07

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 18:27:19

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

tara <jackpine@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 21:42:07

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-07 03:22:57

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

tara <jackpine@[EMAIL

2008-05-07 11:25:06

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"Evelyn Ruut" &

2008-05-07 16:53:21

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-08 03:17:42

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"Evelyn Ruut" &

2008-05-08 09:27:16

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT

2008-05-08 14:52:30

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"Evelyn Ruut" &

2008-05-08 17:12:58

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 23:30:47

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 18:32:04

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[

2008-05-05 18:34:33

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-05 23:31:42

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-05 19:50:19

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[

2008-05-06 15:58:12

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Raymond <niday@[EMAIL

2008-05-06 19:22:01

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-07 03:49:43

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[

2008-05-06 16:18:58

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-07 04:28:54

Really cheap spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)

Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{

2008-05-07 07:42:26

Re: Really cheap spiritualityz (was Re: Cheap thrills)

"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-07 10:15:09

Re: Really cheap spiritualityz (was Re: Cheap thrills)

Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL

2008-05-07 12:08:49

Re: Really cheap spiritualityz (was Re: Cheap thrills)

"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-07 13:11:02

Re: Really cheap spiritualityz (was Re: Cheap thrills)

Ron Fuller <rfuller@[E

2008-05-08 03:30:57

Re: Really cheap spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)

"Evelyn Ruut" &

2008-05-07 11:16:09

Re: Really cheap spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)

norbu.tragri@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-07 05:34:07

Re: Really cheap spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)

"ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE

2008-05-07 05:40:56

Re: Really cheaper spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)

"^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-07 10:17:08

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[

2008-05-11 14:22:11

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"Evelyn Ruut" &

2008-05-11 21:37:12

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

Robert Epstein <vze256

2008-05-12 04:50:59

Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)

"Evelyn Ruut" &

2008-05-12 06:50:11

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 15:35:19 CDT 2008.