Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Buddhism II > Re: Interiority...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 24 of 94 Topic 10417 of 10987
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?

by Robert Epstein <vze256xu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 4, 2008 at 01:13 AM

Jim Walsh wrote:

> On Sat, 3 May 2008 22:33:10 +0800, ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote
> (in article 
> <81bafdca-8561-437c-8d9d-f5f1296d61ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
> 
> 
>>The self we can know is always time limited.
> 
> 
> If you are discussing Buddhism, you are way off. There is no self at
all.
> 

Well it's fun to see that we are all now talking about Buddhist 
philosophy.  Much more fruitful a collaboration than the other 
conversation.  Thank you!

Robert

= = = = = = = = =




 94 Posts in Topic:
Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-25 05:21:07 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-01 10:18:32 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-05 05:05:32 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 09:28:38 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-05-01 10:41:13 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E9j=E0_F  2008-05-01 19:07:32 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 oxtail <oxtail@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 19:23:57 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 =?UTF-8?B?RMOpasOgIEZsdQ=  2008-05-01 20:25:51 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-01 17:43:25 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 07:01:28 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatednesss?
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-03 10:31:23 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-04 01:02:26 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Dave K <dkotschess@[EM  2008-05-02 06:38:21 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-02 09:46:56 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-03 10:23:19 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 10:18:33 
Re: Interiority? Or interalia-relatedness?
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-03 11:32:18 
Re: Interiority? Or interalia-relatedness?
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 10:40:01 
Re: Interiority? Or interalia-relatedness?
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-03 12:57:58 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 09:40:49 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Bill Pfeifer <billpfei  2008-05-05 22:41:01 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-03 07:33:10 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-03 22:38:39 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-04 01:13:04 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 12:10:55 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-04 03:39:20 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-05 16:30:41 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 18:38:52 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 23:24:40 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-03 08:33:43 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 14:16:19 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 05:52:58 
Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-04 06:56:23 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 07:02:07 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-04 07:26:13 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 07:51:29 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-05 02:03:51 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 fred kepler <fkepler@[  2008-05-04 14:05:21 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 jfezl07@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 19:30:04 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-07 03:34:38 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-06 19:31:36 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-07 03:51:19 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 06:40:42 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 jfezl07@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-06 19:52:52 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-07 04:10:46 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-07 04:12:05 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "possum" <ze  2008-05-07 04:16:35 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-06 20:56:41 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-07 04:31:59 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 14:24:52 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 08:05:07 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 14:12:48 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-04 18:18:00 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-05 02:26:24 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-04 18:27:03 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 05:06:51 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-04 18:45:18 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 06:06:12 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-05 04:04:07 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 07:36:44 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 18:25:03 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 23:37:07 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 18:27:19 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 21:42:07 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-07 03:22:57 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 tara <jackpine@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 11:25:06 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-07 16:53:21 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-08 03:17:42 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-08 09:27:16 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 dt <daletx@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 14:52:30 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-08 17:12:58 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 23:30:47 
Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?
 RaaN <raan2000@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 18:32:04 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-05 18:34:33 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-05 23:31:42 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-05 19:50:19 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-06 15:58:12 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-06 19:22:01 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-07 03:49:43 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-06 16:18:58 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-07 04:28:54 
Really cheap spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 Tang Huyen <tanghuyen{  2008-05-07 07:42:26 
Re: Really cheap spiritualityz (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-07 10:15:09 
Re: Really cheap spiritualityz (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 Keynes <Keynes@[EMAIL   2008-05-07 12:08:49 
Re: Really cheap spiritualityz (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-07 13:11:02 
Re: Really cheap spiritualityz (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 Ron Fuller <rfuller@[E  2008-05-08 03:30:57 
Re: Really cheap spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-07 11:16:09 
Re: Really cheap spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 norbu.tragri@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-07 05:34:07 
Re: Really cheap spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-07 05:40:56 
Re: Really cheaper spirituality (was Re: Cheap thrills)
 "^@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-07 10:17:08 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Awaken21 <lukecarlos@[  2008-05-11 14:22:11 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-11 21:37:12 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 Robert Epstein <vze256  2008-05-12 04:50:59 
Re: Cheap thrills (was Re: Interiority? Or inter-relatedness?)
 "Evelyn Ruut" &  2008-05-12 06:50:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 23 23:46:31 CDT 2008.