On Apr 30, 3:13=A0pm, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 1, 6:10 am, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 30, 3:05 pm, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 1, 5:24 am, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 29, 9:57 pm, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > The link you provided discusses Chinese POWs. Yet you claim there
we=
re
> > > > not any Chinese POWs. This sup****ts the theory that you are a
comple=
te
> > > > idiot.
>
> > > You are the real idiot. I said: the allied forces fleeing
> > > for their lives =A0in defeat ..took no prisoners.
>
> > But the discussion was about whether there were Chinese POWs. Why
> > can't you ever stay on topic? I guess that's your defense mechanism
> > for being so wrong and biased all the time. If you constantly change
> > the subject it's easier to mask that. But the intelligent people
> > reading these NGs know that you are wildly dishonest in your
> > discussion.
>
> > > The 'POWs' were young Chinese male civilians, living
> > > in South Korea, who were detained as prisoners by
> > > the Korean authorities just before the Korean war.
>
> > > Fearing that these Chinese males would become
> > > guerrillas in S Korea, the US de****ted them to Taiwan.
> > > I have a few relatives who were de****ted to Taiwan
> > > in this way.
>
> > Ah, so you won't even admit that there were Chinese POWs captured by
> > the allies. And who didn't want to be repatriated to China after the
> > war. Typical of you...
> Don't twist words.
LOL. You post screen after screen of dishonest screed, then tell *me*
not to twist words.
> You nasty s*** bags.
Yes, vilify those who call you on your BS. It's been a technique of
the small-minded for centuries... you are not doing anything new.
|
