Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Buddhism II > Re: debate betw...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 4 Topic 10378 of 11002
Post > Topic >>

Re: debate between a chinese and a french

by norbu.tragri@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 25, 2008 at 04:32 AM

On Apr 24, 6:12 pm, "jbhjhhj" <yamu1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> ???

The phrase here "totally fake" means that the so-called "debate" was
"totally fake",
hence the following statement "so it must be propaganda".

If the so-called  "Peoples Daily" found some French person so ignorant
of the history
of Tibet and China it's obvious that they wanted to set up a situation
to show that
one Westerner (and falsely hence *all* Westerners) are ignorant of the
history of
Tibet and China. Hence the "debate is a "fake".

There are many false dichotomies in the article, such as "one must be
pro-China or pro-Tibet"
in the debate.

Outright falsehoods such as the Dalai Lama sponsors and is sponsored
by the
Aum ****nrikyo cult in Japan, etc - some years ago, before the Aum
****nrikyo started to engage in
illegal activities the cult leader courted Lamas to pose with him in
photographs - there was never
any sup****t that he was was teaching traditional buddhadharma or that
he held a lineage.
This is just an absurd lie. Lamas meet with Christians, Jews, Moslems,
Hindus, etc,
as part of an inter-faith dialog - it does not mean that they sup****t
or endorse the views
of any group they meet with.

Then we have the bit about Tibet practicing "serfdom" in pre-1959
(before the Han-Maoist Invasion)...
The justification for the Invasion in Maoist terms. A "serf" is
someone treated like a slave - they
have no say in what their Masters tell them to do, no say in what
their society does, no freedom
to work where they want, to protest, - no vote, no freedom to speak
with others about their views,
no right to personal property, no say in the legal system, subject to
punitive imprisonment and
execution...That pretty much describes the plight of ALL modern
Tibetans under the corrupt
fake-Maoist Han racist regime, and sadly the plight of plight of all
people in China where they cannot
vote and so say who will be their leaders or what direction their
country or community will take.

Until there is democracy all peoples in China are serfs to the Party.
The Party that pollutes the environment and keeps the people just
above starvation
while the leaders grow rich and fat.

There are many good people in the Party who work hard for the benefit
of all people,
but the upper level of command is totally corrupt - they are the ones
who declare that
the internet must be censored and banned so that the people cannot
hear all the news
and views of the rest of the world. They lie to cling to power, they
enslave, they pollute,
and they aim to be the new Lords of capitalist China.

Autonomy for Tibet, Autonomy for every region. Democracy - let the
people be free to
find their own prosperity.

  - n,

> "Lionheart" <pe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
????news:1261803.UC2KI9suDH@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > tttt in <fue6ts$9t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> :
>
> > >http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90780/91342/6393940.html
>
> > Totally fake, so it must be propaganda.
>
> > Kind regards,
>
> >   Peter
>
> > --
> > mailto:pe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Re: debate between a chinese and a french
Lionheart <peter@[EMAI  2008-04-23 00:08:14 
Re: debate between a chinese and a french
"jbhjhhj" <y  2008-04-25 09:12:33 
Re: debate between a chinese and a french
norbu.tragri@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-25 04:32:24 
Re: debate between a chinese and a french
norbu.tragri@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-04-25 04:40:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 10:06:42 CDT 2008.