On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:16:14 -0700, bluej wrote:
> On Apr 23, 8:29 pm, oxtail <oxt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:17:02 -0700, rst0wxyz wrote:
>> > On Apr 23, 8:07 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> bluej wrote:
>> >> > On Apr 23, 3:42 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> > There are separatists pushing for Vermont's independence from the
>> >> > rest of the states. Why not extend the freedom-to-all logic to
>> >> > U.S. as well? Who cares if chaos ensues? You sir, has no idea that
>> >> > the majority of Tibetan residents are Han-Chinese, the nation's
>> >> > ethnic majority, and to them, freeing of Tibet is a foreign
>> >> > concept. Unlike Taiwan, Tibet has no sustainable economy without
>> >> > the the government's subsidy and support. No prosperity-minded
>> >> > Tibetans will side with you. Why don't you try your human right
>> >> > outcry with the Iceland police? They were just beating the gulp
>> >> > out of the gas-price protesters. You have better chance there.
>>
>> >> Let the Tibetans vote.
>>
>> > The CIA had already stirred up the hornet's nest. Tell the CIA to
>> > stay out of Tibet for the next 5 years, then we can say about having
>> > an election.
>>
>> Leave the poor CIA alone.
>> They cannot even capture
>> the worst terrorist in American history.
>>
>> If we really want to destabilize China, we can simply stop buying from
>> you.
>> But unfortunately that will
>> destabilize our own economy.
>> Still much better than going to war.
>> Are you ready for the boycott?
>>
>
> The long-standing links between Tibetan nationalist forces and the CIA,
> which financed, armed and helped instigate the 1959 uprising against
> Chinese rule, are common knowledge. In the more recent period, CIA
> conduits like the National Endowment for Democracy, set up by the Reagan
> administration in 1984, have provided funds to Tibetan separatist
> movements. And there is no doubt that CIA continues to support the
> separatists financially.
They would be deemed negligent
if they do otherwise.
> The reason China is holding the biggest trade surplus to U.S. is that
> the country is available to predatory foreign corporate interests, who
> now exploit Chinese workers by the tens of millions at miserable wages.
> Abolish world capitalism, then you might have a shot at the boycott.
If that is the case,
what on earth are the leaders of mainland China doing,
prostituting their workers for their luxurious living?
> Also if you are complicit in the Iraqi sociocide, euphemistically known
> as the ‘global war on terror', then you are in no position to lecture
> any one on human rights. The Chinese actions, or rather reactions to the
> riot, don’t begin to approach the horrors committed by the U.S.
> government and military in Iraq.
We are all stupid,
but the Tibetan protesters are not armed.
That makes them more courageous and righteous.
Don't kill or torture them, for your own good.
--
oxtail
|
