Tang Huyen wrote:
>
> Robert Epstein wrote:
>
>
>>Good to see you in any case.
>>
>>If sitting under a tree is the solution,
>>and people are not the problem,
>>where does that leave sangha?
>>where does that leave compassion?
>>
>>I prefer the razor's edge of the Diamond Sutra
>>to an either/or solution:
>>
>>a. "The bodhisattva saves countless beings."
>>b. "The boddhisattva does not allow the thought to arise
>> that he is saving countless beings."
>>c. "Even though countless beings are saved, in truth there are no
>> beings,they are just called such."
>>
>>In other words, he acts without a sense of separate self, he acts
>>without a sense of a separate other, yet he still does act
>>compassionately and does not refrain from acting on behalf of others.
>
>
> The issue to me is not about self and others,
> separate or not, real or not, but it is how to
> know for sure that what I want to do to
> others is good or bad. Marx was
> unquestionably motivated by humanitarian
> motives, but look at the Communist
> movement that took inspiration from him.
> Pol Pot and Khien Sampan were sure that
> they did good and that they did not do evil.
> How can I be sure that I do good and don't
> do evil? What guarantees to me that my
> motivation is good and not evil and that my
> actions that derive from it are good and not
> evil? How can I set myself up as the model
> for all others to follow, especially if I force
> them to follow me? And if my sangha will
> correct me if I am wrong, why did the
> Japanese sangha not correct the Japanese
> Zen masters who trained the Samurai-s at
> war skills right in the meditation halls and
> who vocally advocated the Japanese side
> of WW II without any hesitation? They
> also quoted Buddhist scriptures in the
> sup****t of their nationatistic ideology. At
> least the Communists did not.
>
> Tang Huyen
>
>
If we do not use our awareness to make decent decisions that affect
ourselves and those around us, we have little hope of doing anything
worthwhile. There is always a risk of making a bad choice, but if we
don't hold onto views and practice mindfulness we have a decent chance
of being helpful. Those who have created consistent bad results have
always been attached to a dogma even when the evidence suggested a
change was necessary. We don't have to fall into that trap. Just be a
bit open and the truth will reveal itself as it changes.
Robert
= = = = = = =
|
