On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:02:08 +0000, Robert Epstein wrote:
> stumper wrote:
>
>> Peter Olcott wrote:
>>
>>> "Déjà Fu" <chanfu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:xtKdnU3GULhcuJnanZ2dnUVZ_u_inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> http://newsweek.wa****ngtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2007/10/
the_problem_with_atheism.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sam has put into both context and well-spoken words what I have been
>>>> trying to say here for a long time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Even though it never says so directly, Buddhism is inherently
>>> theistic. NonDuality == God
>>>
>>>
>> Atheism is inherently theistic.
>> God is probably atheistic.
>> Buddhism is inherently atheistic.
>>
>>
> God is inherently non-dual.
> He does not believe in himself as a separate being.
>
> Robert
>
> - - - - - - -
Theistic or atheistic to whom?
--
oxtail
