On Mar 31, 7:16=A0am, diarrhetics <implantol...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:53:59 -0700, rst0wxyz wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 6:10=A0am, diarrhetics <implantol...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:04:54 -0500, niday wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:45:37 +0200, Peter Terpstra
> >> > <pe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> >>ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in <pll1v3tl9kkqhmpuurhd9ggfes8116q...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> :
>
> >> >>> It's not Chinese attitude against the Tibetans in general. It's
> >> >>> Chinese attitude against the former Tibetan slave owner who was,
is=
,
> >> >>> and will always be an oppressor of the Tibetan people.
>
> >> >>That's the official Chinese version :-)
>
> >> > It's not a version. It is the fact of the matter. If you refuse to
> >> > recognize the fact as fact, then there is nothing to talk about.
>
> >> PROTIP: facts don't get facts because someone says it's a fact.
>
> > Yeah, but when a lie is repeated often enough for Americans, the
America=
ns
> > can't recognize lies from facts, and lies become fact for most
Americans=
..
>
> then i'm lucky, that i'm not a american i guess.
Then I guess you chose the correct ID, diarreha.
>
> where i come from, we learn that "the winners get to write history" as
> kids. we also learn, that we should see media and politics critical.
>
> do you learn that too in chinese schools?
I don't remember. I was too young to know such things.
|
