Re: CAUTION - NON-BAHAIS

Sock-Puppet'ullah wrote:

<another cut and paste job>

You have NOTHING to say about the fact that five minutes of research
shows up the loose thinking involved in the most recent screed you've
found after a google search of "Wikipedia + conspiracy"?

You don't care if their facts are right, just so long as they call it
"wackypedia" because they like to keep the science articles up to date
rather than taking seriously a bunch of kooks who think that "morphic
resonance" is real science, and their beliefs are rubbished by a
conspiracy called "Big Science"?

Or is it just a normal case of "don't confuse me with the facts" here?