Re: Why was Jesus crucified?

saint7peter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 12, 10:42 pm, cactus <cac...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Mordecai wrote:
>>
>>> saint7pe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>> On May 12, 9:22 pm, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> saint7pe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>>>>> On May 12, 10:05 am, Robert Epstein <vze25...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Foolish," "inaccurate" and "anti-semite" may be insulting, but
they are
>>>>>>> not racial insults.
>>>>>> This is just a typical example of the old switcheroo, at which
modern
>>>>>> Jews are so expert.  They commit the crime and then get someone
else
>>>>>> to do the time.  Not anymore, Upstein.  We see through all your
>>>>>> tricks.  The gig is up.
>>>>>> In other words, racism is inherent in the Jewish worldview, and so
>>>>>> Jews have always been the ones crying the loudest about "anti-
>>>>>> semitism."  It is a trick, a diversion, a deflection from their own
>>>>>> misdeeds by projecting them onto others.
>>>>> You must have a very amnesiac view of history.  Try reality
sometime; I
>>>>> know it's not for sissies, but it's a good tonic.
>>>>> Robert
>>>> Whose reality?  As rewritten Orwellian style by your kind?  I don't
>>>> think so.
>>> Umm ... Reality could be defined when your expectations of reality
turn out to
>>> be wrong - and you are forced to change your opinion.
>>> It is a simplistic definition but eminently usable - as in turning
from what you
>>> know is false ...
>>> If your old ideas are "going to give the wrong results" your new ideas
are at
>>> least going to be "possible" rather than predetermined to be wrong.
>>> I have addressed this with you several times.
>>> You keep making statements which are untrue and I merely pointed out
that they
>>> were untrue and this could be tested.
>>> Upon testing (which I did) - I discovered that your ideas and
expectations and
>>> truth were ... false.
>>> And then I asked "What now?"
>>> So what do you do when your expectations about "what is real" turns
out to be
>>> false?
>>> Do you keep hold of ideas which inevitably and invariantly are
provably
>>> incorrect?
>> I have never pj****nik alter his views base on their rightness or
>> wrongness.  The only thing that seems to change them is his momentary
>> brain chemistry and the latest mythos he reads.
>>
>>> --
>>> Mordecai!
> 
> As you know, this is another switcheroo on your part.

 From what to what?