On May 7, 9:35=A0am, "///Rod\\\\\\" <////icom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> =A0 =A0Actually it isn't either one of us...it's Merle Elaine Matthews,
> =A0 =A0and unlike YOU I can and DO read headers and provide evidence...
>
> =A0 =A0 Look at the first server at the left in the path statement. That
i=
s
> =A0 =A0 the server that accepts requests from the address ranges of 1 -
25=
4,
> =A0 =A0 ignoring ip addy's 0 and 255. Notice the addy range in this
header=
> below, then compare it with the address on Elaine Matthews header...
> =A0 =A0 Elaine can manipulate her address between the ranges, 1-254. The
> =A0 =A0 ip address allocation figures somewhat like this...4 sets of
three=
> =A0 =A0 digits...reading also right to left the first 3 would be the
local=
> address range of 1-254. The second set of 3 to the left would be a
> larger range of address, and to the left are larger and farther out
> address that eventually encompass the entire network range.
>
> =A0 =A0Elaine has been trying to defeat this scheme by using an anon
serve=
r,
> =A0 =A0AIOE to post thru. However it doesn't work BECAUSE the path
stateme=
nt
> =A0 =A0included the server that receives her posts before they reach the
> news server network.
>
> =A0 =A0The first server in the path line determines who it is doing the
> posting. =A0Now go to the bottom of the page and compare that ip address
> of the first server in the path statement...
>
> flpi142.ffdc.sbc.com server address is 209.91.172.154 in Subury
Canada...
>
> =A0 =A0Merle Elaine Matthews is the forger....
All your "evidence" shows is that you have found a way to forge
headers. It's still you, Rodney - as I have stated repeatedly, your
posts have revealing similarities and if one knows how to spot those
similarities, one is able to see that the forger and sock-poster is
still only you.
|
