Re: Are the New Testament miracles plausible?

David wrote:
> On Apr 30, 6:51 am, The Real Doctor <ubergeek...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> On 30 Apr, 01:46, David <pchristain...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 29, 6:12 pm, The Real Doctor <ubergeek...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Miracles are always implausible. It goes with the territory.
>>>> ...
>>> My meaning is that the New Testament miracles never
>>> happened.
>> Oh, right, so it's just another lead-in to the "NT miracles were
>> actually political conversions" claims, then?
>>
>> Count me out of this.
>> ...
> 
> You anticipate too much; that's why our conversations
> never go anywhere.
> 
> d.c.
> 


   Allow me to ask this question then; how will it effect the quaker
   communtiy as a whole if it is found that Christ did not die on
   the cross, or even much worse, that he did in fact die on the cross
   but as a sacrifice for the jews only ?

   Would this not shake even the stoutest quakers spiritual foundations ?


    Rod