Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Quaker > Re: is it viabl...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 20 Topic 5057 of 5654
Post > Topic >>

Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?

by Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 3, 2008 at 09:25 PM

David wrote:
> On Apr 30, 10:58 am, "\"<316>\"" <316k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 5:53 am, David <pchristain...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> You drop a load of bunk whenever you appear.  Go away.
>> The previous post was likely written by Rodney Eastman, not me,
>> David.  Just as the post below was not written by John W but also
>> likely by Rodney.
> 
> I am prepared to believe you over Rodney on this specific.
> 
> However, I note I am more concerned than you about quakerism,
> George Fox's unusual and uncompromising approach to the
> Christian faith.  So, the issue I would like SRQers to discuss is
> whether it is viable for quakerism to sidestep its Christian roots.
> 
> ...
> 
> David Christainsen

  Then David, you would be a fool. I have forged no posts, but there is
  one among you that is doping all they can to destroy anything decent
  in these groups.

  I have no reason to deceive you David. I can openly disagree with you
  without the need to lie or deceive others.

   I'm not posting as anyone but myself and you are a fool to believe
  anything else. I haven't been here in several days. I came back hoping
  to find peace here, and found mayhem in it's place. It needs to be said
  that friends of Kelly may be among you from the alt.politics.homo***ual
  group, and these people are experts at deceiving others as they do it
  on a regular basis. One of them is known by the name Red Dog.

  I do consider you a spammer David, but that is not justification for
  agreeing with this person about me when you lack the proof. if you wish
  to be dealt with in the manner you are dealinmg with me then I can
  accommodate you in that regard. The fact that I prefer NOT to should
  tell you something.....

   Rod

-- 

To quote Jerry Moon;


Spelling mistakes above left in for people who need to correct
others to make their life fulfilled.


Copyright protected
Permission granted to copy for replies in News Groups
Jerry Moon
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Is it viable for quakerism to sidestep its Christian roots?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-27 10:59:41 
is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-04-28 07:15:40 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-28 05:53:15 
Re:
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 23:17:54 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
john w <johnw<no>  2008-04-28 22:22:49 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-29 08:39:34 
Re: Is it viable for quakerism to sidestep its Christian roots?
The Real Doctor <uberg  2008-04-29 15:15:06 
Re: Is it viable for quakerism to sidestep its Christian roots?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-29 17:42:11 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-04-30 07:55:30 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 21:32:20 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-04-30 07:58:41 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-30 09:04:54 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 21:25:05 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
The Real Doctor <uberg  2008-04-30 13:42:22 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-30 13:59:29 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-05-03 23:55:08 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-05-03 23:58:24 
I replace the obvious obnoxious thread reference to myself with
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-05-04 12:53:59 
Re: I replace the obvious obnoxious thread reference to myself w
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-05 10:01:41 
Re: I replace the obvious obnoxious thread reference to myself w
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-05-05 09:08:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 2:37:45 CDT 2008.