Re: Another Rodney Eastman forgery under Elaine's nym. Tsk, tsk.

On Apr 28, 1:25=A0am, john w <johnw<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:15:44 -0700 (PDT), "\"<316>\""<316k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
w=
rote:
>
> =A0=A9 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no ****tion of this
post
> may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
>
> >On Apr 27, 2:56=A0pm, la Bella <labe...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> Why all this liar nonsense, from what I've seen of John he seems like
a=

> >> likable sort. A little rough on the edges, but harmless I'm sure?
>
> >Oh, joy. =A0Yet another sock-puppet nym.
>
> =A0 And yet, you RARELY -- if EVER-- change YOUR nym!
>
> =A0How many nym changes have you gone thru in the several years I've
> been aware of you?
>
> =A0 I've lost count.

Hmmm...changing one's nym was not the point, John.  Someone being yet
another sock-puppet was.  I imagine that if you could figure out how
to create and maintain a sock-puppet, you would.  But, alas, we all
know you aren't even *that* bright.

And, as far as changing one's nym goes...

I know there's a very, very long list of your nyms throught the years
(did you forget? - maybe someone will be kind enough to refresh your
memory by posting it again).