On Apr 27, 6:17=A0pm, john w <johnw<no>@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yesOn Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:51:24 -0400, NOSPAM
<nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> =A0=A9 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no ****tion of this
post
> may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
>
> >On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:51:46 -0700 (PDT), "\"<316>\""
> ><316k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>On Apr 27, 5:37=A0am, NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>> It's too bad, because I DID consider him a friend.
>
> >>> Well, Elaine - it's not like you weren't warned about him, and it's
no=
t as if you hadn't seen what he's posted over the years.
>
> >I can only speak as I find a person, Kelly. At that time, he SEEMED
> >okay - I see now I was sadly mistaken.
>
> =A0 Yep. =A0Rod committed the unpardonable sin; he figured YOU out, and
he=
> realized that if he was nice to me, I'd be nice to him.
>
> =A0 =A0He should be put against a wall, shot, then put on the rack, then
> quartered, castrated, burned at the stake...
>
> =A0 what else can we do to Rod for being nice to John Weatherly!???
>
>
>
> >>> He has gone
> >>> turncoat, so the problem rests on his shoulders.
>
> >>Rodney hasn't "gone turncoat", he's just being the same person he has
> >>been in here for years. =A0He plays people - he plays on their
> >>sympathies and their interests to suck them in and then suddnely
> >>becomes a raving lunatic telling lies about his target(s).
>
> >Yes, I noticed that.
> >The garbage about my supposed 'illicit affair' was a prime example.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0There are those who would believe Rod before they'd believe
YOU=
,
> Elaine!
>
> =A0 That's because you've been known as "Queen Liar" for a number of
> YEARS now.
>
>
>
> >>It's probably best at this point to not believe anything he says
> >>because he lies about everything. =A0He's lied about practically
> >>everything since he's been here. =A0I wouldn't be surprised if the
whole=
> >>story about his dog BJ was a lie because he knows you have a soft-spot
> >>for animals.
>
> >Could well be, Kelly. However,
>
> =A0 =A0Gossip gossip gossip!
>
> =A0 From two who call themselves Christians! =A0One, a mad scientist
(RN);=
> the other a "lesbian pastor."
>
> =A0 =A0What do these two odd apples have in common?
>
> =A0 =A0They both DESPISE John Weatherly!
Hilarious. You step into something between two other people that has
absolutely nothing to do with you and you *still* find a way to make
it all about you.
<sarcasm mode on>
No, John - you're not a narcissist at all!
<sarcasm mode off>
|
