Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Quaker > Is it viable fo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 20 Topic 5057 of 5099
Post > Topic >>

Is it viable for quakerism to sidestep its Christian roots?

by David <pchristainsen@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 27, 2008 at 10:59 AM

Religious Society of Friends
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_Society_of_Friends

"Many Quakers feel their faith does not fit within
traditional Christian categories of Catholic,
Orthodox or Protestant, but is an expression
of another way of experiencing God.

Although Quakers throughout most of their
history and in most parts of the world today
consider Quakerism to be a Christian movement,
some Friends (principally in some Meetings
in the United States and the United Kingdom)
now consider themselves universalist, agnostic,
atheist, realist, humanist, postchristian, or
nontheist, or do not accept any religious label."

My objection is to the downgrading of the Bible
and Jesus Christ.

My hope is that the issues that divide will be worked
out in discussion and debate.

---

David Christainsen




 20 Posts in Topic:
Is it viable for quakerism to sidestep its Christian roots?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-27 10:59:41 
is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-04-28 07:15:40 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-28 05:53:15 
Re:
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 23:17:54 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
john w <johnw<no>  2008-04-28 22:22:49 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-29 08:39:34 
Re: Is it viable for quakerism to sidestep its Christian roots?
The Real Doctor <uberg  2008-04-29 15:15:06 
Re: Is it viable for quakerism to sidestep its Christian roots?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-29 17:42:11 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-04-30 07:55:30 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 21:32:20 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-04-30 07:58:41 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-30 09:04:54 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 21:25:05 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
The Real Doctor <uberg  2008-04-30 13:42:22 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-30 13:59:29 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-05-03 23:55:08 
Re: is it viable for david to be any more of an ass clown?
"\"<316>\  2008-05-03 23:58:24 
I replace the obvious obnoxious thread reference to myself with
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-05-04 12:53:59 
Re: I replace the obvious obnoxious thread reference to myself w
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-05 10:01:41 
Re: I replace the obvious obnoxious thread reference to myself w
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-05-05 09:08:31 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat May 17 4:29:21 CDT 2008.