On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:23:31 -0700 (PDT), "\"<316>\""
<316kcbk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Apr 26, 5:03 pm, Rod <icom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> I've had nothing to do with these posts. If you can prove otherwise
>> then do so, otherwise shut your lying trap.
>
>Why should we believe you, Rodney? You lie, lie, lie and lie some
>more. You threaten, you hack, you scan, you forge, you sock, you lie
>some more, you scream and shout and flail all about. And then you lie
>some more. Sorry, but there is nothing based on your behavior in
>Usenet over the years to indicate that you are someone who can be
>trusted.
>
>You're crying wolf, Rodney - and no one believes you any longer -
>except, of course your new friends in the Friends group and John
>Weatherly. One accepts practically anyone and the other accepts
>Usenet friends purely out of desperation. I predict that you will
>sabotage both alliances within...oh, say...
>
Interesting, Kelly -- what 'friends' group would that be?
I've had experience with a couple of those groups - one was good; the
other, YECHGKH!
>until you feel you have used them enough and you get bored - needing
>someone new to target. You don't last long with people who are nice
>to you, huh? (It's your established pattern, after all)
That's why I killfiled him. I noticed that AFTER killfiling him (and
he knew he was in the bozo bin) he started the lies to liar-johnnie
concerning my supposedly having had an adulterous affair! What a
boring life Roddy must lead.
I'm sure the old boy must have been wringing his hands waiting for me
to post "Oh, no I DIDN'T! I'm innocent, etc...... but had I bothered,
then the liar would only have insisted 'I protested too much,
therefore must be supposedly presumed guilty'- What an idiot.
It's too bad, because I DID consider him a friend. He has gone
turncoat, so the problem rests on his shoulders.
|
