Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Quaker > Re: Kelly is do...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 125 Topic 5037 of 5639
Post > Topic >>

Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..

by Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 25, 2008 at 09:36 PM

Rod wrote:
> Tom McDonald wrote:
>> "<316>" wrote:
>>> On Apr 25, 2:56 pm, David <pchristain...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Take it somewhere else.
>>>
>>> You know, David - I find it really interesting that when SRQ'ers tell
>>> you that you should stop because you are ruining SRQ you deny and
>>> decline.  Now, you are making the same complaint that others have made
>>> about you.
>>>
>>> When you refuse to stop posting off-topic in SRQ, why should anyone
>>> listen to you?
>>
>> How about if I say it?
>>
>> You can take it from me that I agree with David about nearly nothing; 
>> and I agree with you that this is a bit rich coming from him.
>>
>> But I agree with him about this. You and Rod are causing unnecessary 
>> crap in a newsgroup that really, really doesn't need it -- and whose 
>> denizens are generally going to be too polite to tell you to go away.
>>
>> Why not take it somewhere else? It is clear that this animosity didn't 
>> start here, and your continuing fight is only a drive-by tra****ng of 
>> an innocent ng.
> 
> 
>   Look Tom...I posted a response in a baptist group
>   without looking closely to see if the headers
>   had SRQ in them. When I found that it was in the header line I deleted
>   my post. I am not posting to this group from other groups
>   knowingly. Kelly is the one that started doing this as she has an axe
>   to grind and doesn't care about your feelings where I am involved,
>   as he inclusion of SRQ in the header has proven.
> 
>   I can control me only, and apologize for my part, unintentional it
>   was but neglectful nonetheless. I am not accustomed to dealing with 
> such deceit and treachery from people, but will be before to long
> 
>   Again. my apologies..

Appreciated--although I'm not an SRQ regular, but rather an 
occasional looker-in.

I find myself wondering whether the best course is to ignore her. 
I know how hard this can be, especially with a professional prick 
(and yes, women can be pricks) enticing one into replying by 
playing mind games. But it can be done, and can result in a much 
happier life.

I know from personal experience.
 




 125 Posts in Topic:
Rodney and Kelly are ruining SRQ - just stop
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-25 14:56:18 
Re: Rodney and Kelly are ruining SRQ - just stop
"\"<316>\  2008-04-25 16:57:44 
Re: Rodney and Kelly are ruining SRQ - just stop
Tom McDonald <tmcdonal  2008-04-25 20:29:36 
Re:Kelly is doing this deliberately..
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-26 02:00:55 
Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..
Tom McDonald <tmcdonal  2008-04-25 21:36:48 
Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-25 21:55:29 
Re: Rodney and Kelly are ruining SRQ - just stop
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-25 17:08:27 
Re: Rodney and Kelly are ruining SRQ - just stop
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 02:59:48 
Re: Rodney and Kelly are ruining SRQ - just stop
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-25 20:08:17 
Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..
Tom McDonald <kiltmac@  2008-04-25 20:54:23 
Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..
"Yowie" <yow  2008-04-26 20:41:38 
Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-26 13:43:21 
Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..
"\"<316>\  2008-04-25 23:24:57 
Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..
"\"<316>\  2008-04-25 23:26:06 
@@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by Rod
"\"<316>\  2008-04-25 23:30:39 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 15:29:02 
Private Message
   2008-04-26 10:41:19 
Private Message
   2008-04-26 18:58:13 
Private Message
   2008-04-26 17:15:44 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 08:23:14 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 08:20:48 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 12:02:01 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-26 19:03:39 
Private Message
   2008-04-26 17:17:45 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
"\"<316>\  2008-04-27 20:24:42 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 01:32:31 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 10:26:47 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 10:22:02 
Re: Another Rodney Eastman forgery under Elaine's nym. Tsk, tsk.
"\"<316>\  2008-04-28 07:41:14 
Re: Another Rodney Eastman forgery under Elaine's nym. Tsk, tsk.
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 14:40:51 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:02:41 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 19:21:12 
Re: Kelly is doing this deliberately..
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-26 04:47:26 
"David" and "Hendry Leon" ARE THE SAME POSTER!!!!!! ONE AND THE
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-26 15:41:12 
Re: "David" and "Hendry Leon" ARE THE SAME POSTER!!!!!! ONE AND
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-03 21:39:16 
Another Rodney Eastman forgery under Elaine's nym. Tsk, tsk.
"\"<316>\  2008-04-26 08:49:10 
Re: Another Rodney Eastman forgery under Elaine's nym. Tsk, tsk
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 08:54:24 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 06:42:24 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 17:09:57 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 07:37:03 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 01:20:13 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 10:08:05 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:29:56 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:56:28 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 09:55:38 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 10:57:57 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 01:19:34 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 16:58:04 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 17:56:16 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 18:57:22 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 21:01:32 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:32:23 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 17:36:18 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 14:38:38 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 19:15:06 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 09:57:18 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 13:11:11 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 14:39:00 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 19:15:35 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 01:24:20 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:40:32 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:55:19 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 13:11:43 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 14:42:13 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:06:16 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 10:07:35 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:00:18 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:07:28 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 15:55:19 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 17:00:45 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 19:29:52 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 07:56:12 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 10:11:03 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:31:50 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:57:25 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:08:17 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 15:56:18 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 01:21:00 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 10:13:10 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:41:58 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:09:21 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 15:43:21 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
"\"<316>\  2008-04-26 17:23:31 
Private Message
   2008-04-26 20:05:04 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 08:37:09 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 18:12:17 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 05:57:46 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 10:32:41 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
"\"<316>\  2008-04-29 16:00:20 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 16:26:18 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
"\"<316>\  2008-04-26 17:37:07 
Private Message
   2008-04-26 20:03:53 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 08:29:46 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 06:54:42 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 16:48:51 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 18:07:59 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 10:10:08 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
"\"<316>\  2008-04-26 17:39:59 
Private Message
   2008-04-26 20:07:36 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 08:38:53 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 19:06:54 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
"\"<316>\  2008-04-27 09:51:46 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
NOSPAM <nospam@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 16:51:24 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 18:17:00 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 10:20:49 
Private Message
   2008-04-27 18:13:47 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 10:27:56 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 13:46:39 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
"\"<316>\  2008-04-29 22:53:02 
Private Message
   2008-04-30 05:09:19 
Re: Another Rodney Eastman forgery under Elaine's nym. Tsk, tsk.
"\"<316>\  2008-04-27 20:15:44 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 01:25:22 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 11:33:30 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:03:41 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 10:06:19 
Re: @@@Did Elaine write this or is it yet another post forged by
"\"<316>\  2008-04-27 20:21:44 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 01:37:58 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 10:31:22 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 13:48:59 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:19:56 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 09:34:57 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 14:10:56 
Private Message
   2008-04-28 12:20:39 
Private Message
   2008-04-29 09:36:11 
Re: "David" and "Hendry Leon" ARE THE SAME POSTER!!!!!! ONE AND
"\"<316>\  2008-05-04 00:29:39 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 23 23:18:37 CDT 2008.