Engineer wrote:
> Rod wrote:
>
>> No David, you are wrong about me baiting you. My purpose in asking is
>> to understand the basic relation****p between your topics and quakerism,
>> and there are times when there is NO legitimate relation****p. I'm under
>> no obligation to agree with you but there may be times that I will.
>>
>> If you must agree with kelly, agree because it's your choice to do
>> so. It's far better to be deceived by her than to be like
>> her...seriously, you're playing kiss and tell with the devil. This
Kelly
>> is much more evil than you will ever be willing to comprehend, and I
say
>> this from the perspective that believes their is NO god, that isn't to
>> say that evil doesn't exist, or good either......You've been warned....
>> I've done all I'm going to do to alert you. The fall is on you......
>
> What I am about to write may seem critical, but please keep in
> mind that the reason I am writing to you and not the other two
> that I am about to mention is because I believe that you are
> capable of reason and that neither one of them is. Please take
> what I am about to write in that light.
>
> Here is, in my opinion, your problem: You have failed to
> actually killfile kelly. Oh sure, you told your killfile
> to make her posts disapear, and you did it again when she
> morphed to evade killfiles, but you have still left her
> a method that she can use to get her words in front of your
> eyes, thus defeating your own filters.
>
> The way you are defeatig your own filters is to read David's
> posts that quote kelly. Then you respond, thus sending two
> messages: your message to kelly is that she can still reach
> you and hurt you by the simple method of flaming you in a post
> addressed to David. Your message to David is that you are
> willing to give him what he craves -- being the center of
> attention -- as a reward for being the pipeline from kelly
> to you.
>
> Contrast this to what I do; when I saw "\<316>\ wrote:"
> at the top of your post, I hit a macro on my newsreader
> that deleted every line that starts with ">" and I started
> reading from there. It's a matter of self-discipliine.
> I simply refuse to read it. (I have also set up a
> program that motitors the posts I don't see for futher
> morphing and autocompains to her ISP. If she makes too
> many changes to her "From" line her ISP will block her
> access.)
>
> I suggest that you block *ALL* of the ways that kelly can
> get her wods in front of your eyes. Killfile David if
> that's what it takes -- you won't be missing much.
>
> Eventually she will grow tired of shouting into an empty
> hall and find another victim.
>
>> You need to KNOW one thing now..I want NOTHING to do with you; and
>> that means on the news groups, on the web, in any forum anywhere...
>> NOTHING ! Get it thru your thick ****ing skull that I detest your
>> sorry disturbed mind and take a hike !
>
> I have found that the best way to have nothing to do with someone
> is to have nothing to do with them. You appear to be under the
> impression that a good way to nothing to do with someone is to
> have a back-and-forth flamewar with them. How's that working
> out for you?
I'll know when it's over, but it shouldn't be here and I've already
adjusted my filters effectively ( I hope... ).
|
