Rod wrote:
> No David, you are wrong about me baiting you. My purpose in asking is
>to understand the basic relation****p between your topics and quakerism,
>and there are times when there is NO legitimate relation****p. I'm under
>no obligation to agree with you but there may be times that I will.
>
> If you must agree with kelly, agree because it's your choice to do
>so. It's far better to be deceived by her than to be like
>her...seriously, you're playing kiss and tell with the devil. This Kelly
>is much more evil than you will ever be willing to comprehend, and I say
>this from the perspective that believes their is NO god, that isn't to
>say that evil doesn't exist, or good either......You've been warned....
>I've done all I'm going to do to alert you. The fall is on you......
What I am about to write may seem critical, but please keep in
mind that the reason I am writing to you and not the other two
that I am about to mention is because I believe that you are
capable of reason and that neither one of them is. Please take
what I am about to write in that light.
Here is, in my opinion, your problem: You have failed to
actually killfile kelly. Oh sure, you told your killfile
to make her posts disapear, and you did it again when she
morphed to evade killfiles, but you have still left her
a method that she can use to get her words in front of your
eyes, thus defeating your own filters.
The way you are defeatig your own filters is to read David's
posts that quote kelly. Then you respond, thus sending two
messages: your message to kelly is that she can still reach
you and hurt you by the simple method of flaming you in a post
addressed to David. Your message to David is that you are
willing to give him what he craves -- being the center of
attention -- as a reward for being the pipeline from kelly
to you.
Contrast this to what I do; when I saw "\<316>\ wrote:"
at the top of your post, I hit a macro on my newsreader
that deleted every line that starts with ">" and I started
reading from there. It's a matter of self-discipliine.
I simply refuse to read it. (I have also set up a
program that motitors the posts I don't see for futher
morphing and autocompains to her ISP. If she makes too
many changes to her "From" line her ISP will block her
access.)
I suggest that you block *ALL* of the ways that kelly can
get her wods in front of your eyes. Killfile David if
that's what it takes -- you won't be missing much.
Eventually she will grow tired of shouting into an empty
hall and find another victim.
>You need to KNOW one thing now..I want NOTHING to do with you; and
>that means on the news groups, on the web, in any forum anywhere...
>NOTHING ! Get it thru your thick ****ing skull that I detest your
>sorry disturbed mind and take a hike !
I have found that the best way to have nothing to do with someone
is to have nothing to do with them. You appear to be under the
impression that a good way to nothing to do with someone is to
have a back-and-forth flamewar with them. How's that working
out for you?
>Don't talk back, every time you do you lie like an old rug. You need
>to go NOW !
>
>Don't POST TO ME, don't respond to me, don't tell any more lies about
>me in public forums...
So you are saying that the only path you are willing to take to
get out of this is to wait for kelly to stop posting to you,
even though you have shown again and again that you are not
willing to be the grownup here and stop posting to her?
Here is a song you can sing while you thoughtlessly rip
soc.religion.quaker to shreds with your obsession.
"In the clearing stands a boxer, and a fighter by his trade;
And he carries the reminders, of every glove that layed him down,
or cut him till he cried out, in his anger and his shame;
'I am leaving, I am leaving', But the fighter still remains..."
- _The Boxer_, by Simon & Garfunkel
After you (with a lot of help from others) have destroyed
something that was once pure and good and then thrown it
away like a used kneenex,, will you feel any guilt?
|
