Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Quaker > Re: Rod and Kel...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 14 Topic 5006 of 5654
Post > Topic >>

Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it

by Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 20, 2008 at 02:55 PM

David wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2:31 pm, "\"<316>\"" <316k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Apr 20, 11:21 am, Rod <icom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>    David, you post off topic in nearly every group that you attend,
>>>    I WON'T read off topic posts and I WILL filter them AND YOU. I
would
>>>    much rather be nice and polite, but your persistent off topic posts
>>>    are extremely annoying.
>> Riiight.  Is that why you have started threads in this group to
>> intentionally bait David and get him to talk about his pet OT topics?
> 
> You are right about Rodney's baiting; 


   No David, you are wrong about me baiting you. My purpose in asking is 
to understand the basic relation****p between your topics and quakerism,
and there are times when there is NO legitimate relation****p. I'm under
no obligation to agree with you but there may be times that I will.

   If you must agree with kelly, agree because it's your choice to do
so. It's far better to be deceived by her than to be like 
her...seriously, you're playing kiss and tell with the devil. This Kelly
is much more evil than you will ever be willing to comprehend, and I say 
this from the perspective that believes their is NO god, that isn't to 
say that evil doesn't exist, or good either......You've been warned....
I've done all I'm going to do to alert you. The fall is on you......


   Rod
 




 14 Posts in Topic:
Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it some
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-20 09:36:17 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-20 16:46:34 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-20 10:45:10 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-20 13:21:15 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
"\"<316>\  2008-04-20 11:31:17 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-20 12:42:50 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-20 14:55:14 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
Engineer <invalid@[EMA  2008-04-20 20:59:36 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-20 16:20:24 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-20 13:35:45 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-20 16:21:14 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
David <pchristainsen@[  2008-04-20 14:22:43 
Re: Rod and Kelly are at it again - please get off SRQ; take it
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-20 21:29:22 
Re: Rod IS taking it somewhere else..
Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-20 17:00:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 2:36:01 CDT 2008.