On Apr 20, 2:31=A0pm, "\"<316>\"" <316k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 11:21=A0am, Rod <icom...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > =A0 =A0David, you post off topic in nearly every group that you
attend,
> > =A0 =A0I WON'T read off topic posts and I WILL filter them AND YOU. I
wo=
uld
> > =A0 =A0much rather be nice and polite, but your persistent off topic
pos=
ts
> > =A0 =A0are extremely annoying.
>
> Riiight. =A0Is that why you have started threads in this group to
> intentionally bait David and get him to talk about his pet OT topics?
You are right about Rodney's baiting; you are wrong
that I have any pet topics - either OT or NT.
Further - not that this applies to you but some SRQers are
controlling in trying to dictate what material is off topic or
on topic for SRQ. Their names include Guy Macon, Yowie,
and Ian.
Still further - I think it is im****tant to say that love is not blind
because what you send out will always come back to you.
=2E..
David Christainsen
|
