Theological ****ft in March Ensign magazine?

I was reading the March 2008 edition of the Ensign magazine.

In the article entitled "The Atonement of Jesus Christ", it says on
page 35, "His ransom for Adam's original transgression so that no
member of the human family is held responsible for that sin ... while
all members of the human family are freely given a reprieve from
Adam's sin through no effort of their own, they are not given a
reprieve from their own sins unless they pledge faith in Christ ...
and press forward in faithful endurance the remainder of life's
journey."

This appears to be a huge theology ****ft in LDS theology.

I have spoken to several Latter-day Saints and they do not believe
that Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden when they disobeyed
God's commandment.

I have seen conflicting teaching through Mormon history on whether or
not Adam sinned.

Elder Bruce R. McConkie said, "It is proper and according to the
scriptural pattern to speak of the transgression of Adam, but not the
sin of Adam" (Mormon Doctrine, p. 804).

Joseph F. Smith said, "He [mankind] dies in consequence of the sin of
Adam" (Teachings of Presidents of the Church - Joseph F. Smith, p.
89).

And then Joseph Fielding Smith, tenth LDS president, said, "I never
speak of the part Eve took in this fall as a sin, nor do I accuse Adam
of a sin ... This was a transgression of the law, but not a sin ... for
it was something that Adam and Eve had to do" (Pearl of Great Price
Student Manual, p. 13).

If you study the Pearl of Great Price, both Adam and Eve glorify God
for their transgression (see Moses 5:10-11).

Is the LDS Church now changing her view again?

Jeff