Re: How Should We Respond to Homo***uality?

"Matthew Johnson" <matthew_member@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:KYSPj.6065$kt1.5405@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <GvwPj.3847$wO1.3002@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, RP says...
>>
>>"Matthew Johnson" <matthew_member@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:QuaPj.605$Y81.79@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>>What are your reasons in believing it's not?
>>>
>>>
>>> That it is not "hard-wired before birth"?
>>>
>>> Three reasons:
>>>
>>> 1) I have seen it change in persons I know
>>>
>>> 2) I have heard others re****t it changed in persons _they_ know
>>> (e.g., http://wday.ru/love/twopeople/relation****p/_article/2496/)
>>>
>>> 3) the Bible itself makes it clear that there exist cases where it
>>> changed
>>> (see,
>>> g.e., Rom 1:18-32.
>>>
>>> These three reasons are reason enough to disbelieve all the many
>>> irresponsible
>>> voices claiming to have evidence for the impossible.
>>
>>
>>Like Einstein said, theory is theory until you have the data to make it
a
>>fact.
>
> And you do not have the data to make it a fact.


nor has matthew offerred any facts to sup****t his claim.

someone here said it before....you are substituting "wishful thinking" for
real facts and data.

otherwise, where are the multitude of success stories from these
ministries?



>But more im****tant, you miss the point: it was
> _you_ who claimed it is "hard-wired", so all it takes is ONE counter
> example to
> prove you wrong. And I gave such a counter example.

well....maybe THAT person wasn't hard-wired that way....just confused.....

besides this "i know someone who...." isn't anyway to prove a point.