Re: the Bible, translation and gays

On Apr 20, 7:10 pm, the suspect Matthew Johnson
<matthew_mem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
 > >And I asked, in this forum and others, for inherent harms in
> >homo***uality and no one has given me a valid answer.
>
> How long do you plan to continue repeating this lie? You have been
> answered, and that many times. You just prefer to dismiss the answers,
> stirring yourself up to provide some answer only to the weakest of
> them.

Lie? I'll repeat every supposed harm to homo***uality that was posted:

1. No procreation. As I stated before, when populations consisted of
nomadic peoples, or small populations, procreation was necessary to
the survival of the people, but is not needed in today's over-
populated world. Indeed, you should be glad there are gays and
lesbians, who choose not to have biological children, as they aren't
contributing to over-population.

2. Anal ***. It was claimed anal *** leads to incontinence, yet the
poster supplied no sources or do***entation. Also, some gay men don't
have anal *** and some hetero***uals do. And this does not apply to
lesbians.

3. AIDS. AIDS is an equal-op****tunity disease and not confined to the
gay community. Indeed, the highest percentage of AIDS is occurring in
Africa among hetero***ual men. Lesbians have one of the lowest rates
of HIV.

If you can think of more I'd be glad to respond to them, though I
doubt you will as your posts are big on insinuation, insults and
generalities with little real substance.
--
Tara's Transgender Resources
http://tarasresources.net

Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.mccchurch.org