Re: How Should We Respond to Homo***uality?

"Matthew Johnson" <matthew_member@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:QuaPj.605$Y81.79@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>What are your reasons in believing it's not?
>
>
> That it is not "hard-wired before birth"?
>
> Three reasons:
>
> 1) I have seen it change in persons I know
>
> 2) I have heard others re****t it changed in persons _they_ know
> (e.g., http://wday.ru/love/twopeople/relation****p/_article/2496/)
>
> 3) the Bible itself makes it clear that there exist cases where it
changed 
> (see,
> g.e., Rom 1:18-32.
>
> These three reasons are reason enough to disbelieve all the many 
> irresponsible
> voices claiming to have evidence for the impossible.


Like Einstein said, theory is theory until you have the data to make it a 
fact.

I think the overall failure rates of such "change" ministries is enough 
evidence and reason enough to disbelieve people who pur****t to "know 
someone" who changed.

Anyone see Ted Haggard?

Anyone hear of the Catholic Church Crisis?