Re: How Should We Respond to Homo***uality?

On Apr 21, 5:41 pm, the suspect Matthew Johnson
<matthew_mem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Three reasons:
>
> 1) I have seen it change in persons I know

So you claim, but how do we know this is true? And if we are believe
you, how do we know these persons have actually 'changed'? In all the
cases that I know of the homo***uality has not changed, but merely
been sublimated.

> 2) I have heard others re****t it changed in persons _they_ know
> (e.g.,http://wday.ru/love/twopeople/relation****p/_article/2496/)

More questionable, second-hand re****ts? For someone who appears to
value do***entation this fails.
>
> 3) the Bible itself makes it clear that there exist cases where it
changed (see,
> g.e., Rom 1:18-32

This section does not refer to the loving, longterm relation****ps of
today. It most likely refers to homo***ual rape and prostitution.

But the most dramatic evidence that refutes your 'sources' are the Am.
Psychological Assoc. and the Am. Psychiatry Assoc., which both state
that homo***uality is not a choice and unchangeable. Indeed, the vast
majority of therapists and ***ologists agree. But, of course, modern
science is wrong and you're right.
--
Tara's Transgender Resources
http://tarasresources.net

Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.mccchurch.org