Re: How Should We Respond to Homo***uality?

>>> You may well believe it is "hard-wired before birth", _and_ that it is 
>>> so
>>> independent of ***ual orientation but the only 'sup****t' you have for 
>>> this
>>> position is just as shaky
>>
>>What are your reasons in believing it's not?
>
>
> That it is not "hard-wired before birth"?
>
> Three reasons:
>
> 1) I have seen it change in persons I know

Well, where are all these people that neo-cons point to?  Why are they all

so invisible?

> 2) I have heard others re****t it changed in persons _they_ know
> (e.g., http://wday.ru/love/twopeople/relation****p/_article/2496/)

Must we go to Russia for this change?  Or is it available everywhere?

> 3) the Bible itself makes it clear that there exist cases where it
changed 
> (see,
> g.e., Rom 1:18-32.

Again, this is not the Gospel...nor words of Jesus Christ.

As was pointed out by the moderator, you have to read passages such as
this 
in the context of who was writing it...and who they were writing to.

It was written to different cultures. That's a simple fact. The
question is how that fact affects how we read it.

> These three reasons are reason enough to disbelieve all the many 
> irresponsible
> voices claiming to have evidence for the impossible. But there are more.

You may have had enough to convince yourself of something you want to 
believe....but there is no "evidence" this is possible.