In article <zpgIj.12488$oE1.7781@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, B says...
>On Mar 30, 7:35 pm, AJA <ahnem...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Bren" <BGK...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:P6YGj.6125$Pc2.5865@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Father, Son and Holy Spirit = the One God. Jesus is not
>> tradictionally (or otherwise) nally referred to as an "aspect" by
>> the Church.
>> Blessings,
>> Ann
>B - oh I know that Jesus is not in modern times traditionally
>referred to as an aspect but as part of ONE God he is indeed an
>aspect.
Such a bold assertion for someone who tells _others_ to say "in my
opinion"!
No, Bren, not just in modern times. In ancient times also, it was
never _traditionally_ done. Rather, it was in ancient times that those
who _did_ demote Him to mere 'aspect' were anathematized. Some
traditionalists still repeat that anathema today, i.e., on the first
Sunday of Lent, which was Mar 17th this year.
>..such as a facet of a diamond is one view into the same diamond as
>all the other facets. I was talking about God and Jesus however
>..not what the Church decides. I tend to take my ****ging from them
>and not fallible human beings for the most part. I.M.O Bren
Oh really? Well guess what, Bren. Some of have the opinion that you
are wrong about who this '****ging' comes from. Very wrong indeed. So
wrong, you cut yourself off from your own salvation by following this
'****ging'.
--
------------------------------
Subducat se sibi ut haereat Deo
Quidquid boni habet tribuat illi a quo factus est
(Sanctus Aurelius Augustinus, Ser. 96)
|
