"Miguel" <responderalgrupo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> escribió en el mensaje news:...
> "Sarah Kanary" <skanary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> escribió en el mensaje
> news:0851A068-42B6-68DA-273E-2DF5E5C21CB2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Miguel" <responderalgrupo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:7A1F342E-8571-0DE1-F89E-3E1A221F64D6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Sarah Kanary" <skanary@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> escribi=F3 en el mensaje
>>> news:A06FB869-4E72-670D-6A66-8F1DCD9FEA5C@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> Never would I delete that or any part of Scripture. I
>>>> consider the context of the rest of the Bible, as
>>>> mentioned
>>>> above. Another example, not to be ignored:
>>>
>>> But comparing various verses of the Bible of the JW in
>>> comparison with a
>>> Bible classical, there are omissions or changes of words
>>> in im****tant
>>> concepts.
>>
>> What do you think? Is it wise and just to change "YHWH" to=20
>> "LORD" thousands of times? Would God have inspired His Name=20
>> to be in Scripture so many times if it was not an im****tant=20
>> concept?
>>
>> The wonderful Kingdom hope ****nes clear through any Bible,=20
>> which is to be shared with rejoicing from whatever=20
>> translation is available.
>
> For example, in the Bible of the JW says in John 20: "My God, my God"
(or
> something similar), when in the real Word of God says "My Lord and my
> God!"
To avoid confusions, I'd like to clarify this answer, It must be:
For example, in the Bible of the JW says in John 1: "and the Word was a
god".
When in the real Word of God says "and the Word was God".
--
Miguel M. Yalán
http://mmyv.com
--
((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group. All posts are approved by a
moderator. )))
((( Read http://srcbs.org
for details about this group BEFORE you post.
)))
|
