Hi Richard,
> ...to my munderstanding "sup****ted by reason" is the same as
"sup****ted
> by verifiable evidence".
To me, reason is different from evidence.
> Can you give me a specific example of your "conceptuality of existence
> sup****t(ng) your experience?
Those things about the bridge and the mountain were examples. Also, if
someone throws something in my direction, I can often manipulate the
physical mechanics of my existence to catch that something, or at least
move
out of its path. Such is an indication that my space/time conceptuality
is
to some extent accurate, and therefore useful.
--Kent
"Richard H. Gravelly" <rgravelly@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:UsadnfnT7IqocrzVnZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kent Johnson" <kent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> > "sounds very reasonable" ... is not the same as "sup****ted
>> > by reason".
>>
>> I am sorry if I took advantage of your sensibilities.
>
> You didn't take advantage Kent.
>>
>> What is the difference, then, between reason and what sounds
reasonable?
>
> Kent, to my munderstanding "sup****ted by reason" is the same as
> "sup****ted
> by verifiable evidence".
>
> Is
>> there a difference between logic and what sounds logical?
>
> I think so Kent.
>
>
> Music and what
>> sounds musical?
> I think there is a difference here Kent. If it sounds musical, it is
> music.
> If it is said to be music (as in the twelve tone scale music) but is not
> musical to me, it is not music.
>
>
> Joy and what sounds joyful?
>
> In a certain sense "joy" is subjective. Yet I believe that true joy is
of
> divine origin; although some may not think so Kent.
>>
>> Is it your contention that one should not assume the sound of something
>> is
>> sup****t for it?
>
> Kent, I should have written "It reads as very reasonable".
>>
>> You: "What makes you believe that God will make that distinction and
>> judge
>> according to your belief?"
>>
>> The fact that my conceptuality of existence sup****ts my experience.
>
> Can you give me a specific example of your "conceptuality of existence
> sup****t(ng) your experience?
>
> Richard.
> >
>
>
>
>
|
