----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Johnson" <kent@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> > "sounds very reasonable" ... is not the same as "sup****ted
> > by reason".
>
> I am sorry if I took advantage of your sensibilities.
You didn't take advantage Kent.
>
> What is the difference, then, between reason and what sounds reasonable?
Kent, to my munderstanding "sup****ted by reason" is the same as
"sup****ted
by verifiable evidence".
Is
> there a difference between logic and what sounds logical?
I think so Kent.
Music and what
> sounds musical?
I think there is a difference here Kent. If it sounds musical, it is
music.
If it is said to be music (as in the twelve tone scale music) but is not
musical to me, it is not music.
Joy and what sounds joyful?
In a certain sense "joy" is subjective. Yet I believe that true joy is of
divine origin; although some may not think so Kent.
>
> Is it your contention that one should not assume the sound of something
is
> sup****t for it?
Kent, I should have written "It reads as very reasonable".
>
> You: "What makes you believe that God will make that distinction and
judge
> according to your belief?"
>
> The fact that my conceptuality of existence sup****ts my experience.
Can you give me a specific example of your "conceptuality of existence
sup****t(ng) your experience?
Richard.
>
