> "I don't think we should give reasonable consideration to a letter
telling
> us to..."
>
> You have accomplished your purpose, mainly by bringing up the specter of
> Covenant Breaking.
Dear Kent,
Sounds like you're panicking. As Tom and I have both pointed out, I
never said or even insinuated that this person was a Covenant breaker.
> I disagreed with the characterization of the letter, more than once.
Here
> you say it asks us to "visualize Abdu'l-Baha telling us not to do
something
> which the entirety of the Tablets of the Divine Plan urge us to do."
Then we will have to agree to disagree.
> Would it be an attack or a discussion if we were to discuss further your
> motives in avoiding the discussion of this letter?
Only if you mischaracterize them.
> "I don't see what purpose would be served by repeating that here."
>
> Here? You mean it is not appropriate to discuss Tahirih's Letter here in
a
> thread called Tahirih's Letter?
No, I mean there is no purpose in my repeating the same things I have
already stated here earlier. If you weren't listening the first time
and second time you won't listen the third time either.
>
> "If her motives were pure she would have clearly identified herself as a
> Baha'i by now."
>
> I agree the person who wrote the letter should be identified. But we all
> have faults,
You are certainly making a lot of excuses for this person's duplicity.
Susan
